Anatomy of a physics test: Validation of the physics items on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills

We report the results of an analysis of the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) designed to determine whether the TAKS is a valid indicator of whether students know and can do physics at the level necessary for success in future coursework, STEM careers, and life in a technological socie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jill A. Marshall, Eric A. Hagedorn, Jerry O’Connor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2009-03-01
Series:Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
Online Access:http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010104
id doaj-64ad5323a3bc4abc9f64ce7704344c3b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-64ad5323a3bc4abc9f64ce7704344c3b2020-11-24T23:56:38ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research1554-91782009-03-0151Anatomy of a physics test: Validation of the physics items on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and SkillsJill A. MarshallEric A. HagedornJerry O’ConnorWe report the results of an analysis of the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) designed to determine whether the TAKS is a valid indicator of whether students know and can do physics at the level necessary for success in future coursework, STEM careers, and life in a technological society. We categorized science items from the 2003 and 2004 10th and 11th grade TAKS by content area(s) covered, knowledge and skills required to select the correct answer, and overall quality. We also analyzed a 5000 student sample of item-level results from the 2004 11th grade exam, performing full-information factor analysis, calculating classical test indices, and determining each item's response curve using item response theory. Triangulation of our results revealed strengths and weaknesses of the different methods of analysis. The TAKS was found to be only weakly indicative of physics preparation and we make recommendations for increasing the validity of standardized physics testing.http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010104
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jill A. Marshall
Eric A. Hagedorn
Jerry O’Connor
spellingShingle Jill A. Marshall
Eric A. Hagedorn
Jerry O’Connor
Anatomy of a physics test: Validation of the physics items on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills
Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
author_facet Jill A. Marshall
Eric A. Hagedorn
Jerry O’Connor
author_sort Jill A. Marshall
title Anatomy of a physics test: Validation of the physics items on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills
title_short Anatomy of a physics test: Validation of the physics items on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills
title_full Anatomy of a physics test: Validation of the physics items on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills
title_fullStr Anatomy of a physics test: Validation of the physics items on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills
title_full_unstemmed Anatomy of a physics test: Validation of the physics items on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills
title_sort anatomy of a physics test: validation of the physics items on the texas assessment of knowledge and skills
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
issn 1554-9178
publishDate 2009-03-01
description We report the results of an analysis of the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) designed to determine whether the TAKS is a valid indicator of whether students know and can do physics at the level necessary for success in future coursework, STEM careers, and life in a technological society. We categorized science items from the 2003 and 2004 10th and 11th grade TAKS by content area(s) covered, knowledge and skills required to select the correct answer, and overall quality. We also analyzed a 5000 student sample of item-level results from the 2004 11th grade exam, performing full-information factor analysis, calculating classical test indices, and determining each item's response curve using item response theory. Triangulation of our results revealed strengths and weaknesses of the different methods of analysis. The TAKS was found to be only weakly indicative of physics preparation and we make recommendations for increasing the validity of standardized physics testing.
url http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010104
work_keys_str_mv AT jillamarshall anatomyofaphysicstestvalidationofthephysicsitemsonthetexasassessmentofknowledgeandskills
AT ericahagedorn anatomyofaphysicstestvalidationofthephysicsitemsonthetexasassessmentofknowledgeandskills
AT jerryoconnor anatomyofaphysicstestvalidationofthephysicsitemsonthetexasassessmentofknowledgeandskills
_version_ 1716248978959368192