The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks
Abstract Brain research up to date has revealed that structure and function are highly related. Thus, for example, studies have repeatedly shown that the brains of patients suffering from schizophrenia or other diseases have a different connectome compared to healthy people. Apart from stochastic pr...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84813-6 |
id |
doaj-64997af2df6745538de8d9fd4f50fe8d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-64997af2df6745538de8d9fd4f50fe8d2021-03-11T12:10:52ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-03-0111111610.1038/s41598-021-84813-6The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networksThomas Pircher0Bianca Pircher1Eberhard Schlücker2Andreas Feigenspan3Institute of Process Machinery and Systems Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-NurembergDepartment Biology, Animal Physiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-NurembergInstitute of Process Machinery and Systems Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-NurembergDepartment Biology, Animal Physiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-NurembergAbstract Brain research up to date has revealed that structure and function are highly related. Thus, for example, studies have repeatedly shown that the brains of patients suffering from schizophrenia or other diseases have a different connectome compared to healthy people. Apart from stochastic processes, however, an inherent logic describing how neurons connect to each other has not yet been identified. We revisited this structural dilemma by comparing and analyzing artificial and biological-based neural networks. Namely, we used feed-forward and recurrent artificial neural networks as well as networks based on the structure of the micro-connectome of C. elegans and of the human macro-connectome. We trained these diverse networks, which markedly differ in their architecture, initialization and pruning technique, and we found remarkable parallels between biological-based and artificial neural networks, as we were additionally able to show that the dilemma is also present in artificial neural networks. Our findings show that structure contains all the information, but that this structure is not exclusive. Indeed, the same structure was able to solve completely different problems with only minimal adjustments. We particularly put interest on the influence of weights and the neuron offset value, as they show a different adaption behaviour. Our findings open up new questions in the fields of artificial and biological information processing research.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84813-6 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Thomas Pircher Bianca Pircher Eberhard Schlücker Andreas Feigenspan |
spellingShingle |
Thomas Pircher Bianca Pircher Eberhard Schlücker Andreas Feigenspan The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
Thomas Pircher Bianca Pircher Eberhard Schlücker Andreas Feigenspan |
author_sort |
Thomas Pircher |
title |
The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks |
title_short |
The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks |
title_full |
The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks |
title_fullStr |
The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks |
title_full_unstemmed |
The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks |
title_sort |
structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Abstract Brain research up to date has revealed that structure and function are highly related. Thus, for example, studies have repeatedly shown that the brains of patients suffering from schizophrenia or other diseases have a different connectome compared to healthy people. Apart from stochastic processes, however, an inherent logic describing how neurons connect to each other has not yet been identified. We revisited this structural dilemma by comparing and analyzing artificial and biological-based neural networks. Namely, we used feed-forward and recurrent artificial neural networks as well as networks based on the structure of the micro-connectome of C. elegans and of the human macro-connectome. We trained these diverse networks, which markedly differ in their architecture, initialization and pruning technique, and we found remarkable parallels between biological-based and artificial neural networks, as we were additionally able to show that the dilemma is also present in artificial neural networks. Our findings show that structure contains all the information, but that this structure is not exclusive. Indeed, the same structure was able to solve completely different problems with only minimal adjustments. We particularly put interest on the influence of weights and the neuron offset value, as they show a different adaption behaviour. Our findings open up new questions in the fields of artificial and biological information processing research. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84813-6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT thomaspircher thestructuredilemmainbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks AT biancapircher thestructuredilemmainbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks AT eberhardschlucker thestructuredilemmainbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks AT andreasfeigenspan thestructuredilemmainbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks AT thomaspircher structuredilemmainbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks AT biancapircher structuredilemmainbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks AT eberhardschlucker structuredilemmainbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks AT andreasfeigenspan structuredilemmainbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks |
_version_ |
1724224689370300416 |