The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks

Abstract Brain research up to date has revealed that structure and function are highly related. Thus, for example, studies have repeatedly shown that the brains of patients suffering from schizophrenia or other diseases have a different connectome compared to healthy people. Apart from stochastic pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Pircher, Bianca Pircher, Eberhard Schlücker, Andreas Feigenspan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84813-6
id doaj-64997af2df6745538de8d9fd4f50fe8d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-64997af2df6745538de8d9fd4f50fe8d2021-03-11T12:10:52ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-03-0111111610.1038/s41598-021-84813-6The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networksThomas Pircher0Bianca Pircher1Eberhard Schlücker2Andreas Feigenspan3Institute of Process Machinery and Systems Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-NurembergDepartment Biology, Animal Physiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-NurembergInstitute of Process Machinery and Systems Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-NurembergDepartment Biology, Animal Physiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-NurembergAbstract Brain research up to date has revealed that structure and function are highly related. Thus, for example, studies have repeatedly shown that the brains of patients suffering from schizophrenia or other diseases have a different connectome compared to healthy people. Apart from stochastic processes, however, an inherent logic describing how neurons connect to each other has not yet been identified. We revisited this structural dilemma by comparing and analyzing artificial and biological-based neural networks. Namely, we used feed-forward and recurrent artificial neural networks as well as networks based on the structure of the micro-connectome of C. elegans and of the human macro-connectome. We trained these diverse networks, which markedly differ in their architecture, initialization and pruning technique, and we found remarkable parallels between biological-based and artificial neural networks, as we were additionally able to show that the dilemma is also present in artificial neural networks. Our findings show that structure contains all the information, but that this structure is not exclusive. Indeed, the same structure was able to solve completely different problems with only minimal adjustments. We particularly put interest on the influence of weights and the neuron offset value, as they show a different adaption behaviour. Our findings open up new questions in the fields of artificial and biological information processing research.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84813-6
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Pircher
Bianca Pircher
Eberhard Schlücker
Andreas Feigenspan
spellingShingle Thomas Pircher
Bianca Pircher
Eberhard Schlücker
Andreas Feigenspan
The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks
Scientific Reports
author_facet Thomas Pircher
Bianca Pircher
Eberhard Schlücker
Andreas Feigenspan
author_sort Thomas Pircher
title The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks
title_short The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks
title_full The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks
title_fullStr The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks
title_full_unstemmed The structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks
title_sort structure dilemma in biological and artificial neural networks
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Brain research up to date has revealed that structure and function are highly related. Thus, for example, studies have repeatedly shown that the brains of patients suffering from schizophrenia or other diseases have a different connectome compared to healthy people. Apart from stochastic processes, however, an inherent logic describing how neurons connect to each other has not yet been identified. We revisited this structural dilemma by comparing and analyzing artificial and biological-based neural networks. Namely, we used feed-forward and recurrent artificial neural networks as well as networks based on the structure of the micro-connectome of C. elegans and of the human macro-connectome. We trained these diverse networks, which markedly differ in their architecture, initialization and pruning technique, and we found remarkable parallels between biological-based and artificial neural networks, as we were additionally able to show that the dilemma is also present in artificial neural networks. Our findings show that structure contains all the information, but that this structure is not exclusive. Indeed, the same structure was able to solve completely different problems with only minimal adjustments. We particularly put interest on the influence of weights and the neuron offset value, as they show a different adaption behaviour. Our findings open up new questions in the fields of artificial and biological information processing research.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84813-6
work_keys_str_mv AT thomaspircher thestructuredilemmainbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks
AT biancapircher thestructuredilemmainbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks
AT eberhardschlucker thestructuredilemmainbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks
AT andreasfeigenspan thestructuredilemmainbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks
AT thomaspircher structuredilemmainbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks
AT biancapircher structuredilemmainbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks
AT eberhardschlucker structuredilemmainbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks
AT andreasfeigenspan structuredilemmainbiologicalandartificialneuralnetworks
_version_ 1724224689370300416