Testing for measurement equivalence of individuals’ left-right orientation

Subjective variables such as opinions, attitudes or preferences cannot be measured directly. Researchers have to rely on the answers people give in surveys, and whenever those answers shall be compared it is required that people answer these questions in the same way. Only then a concept can be used...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wiebke Weber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Survey Research Association 2011-04-01
Series:Survey Research Methods
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/4622
id doaj-6486e650f0334ddfb48d989c9e73d232
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6486e650f0334ddfb48d989c9e73d2322020-11-24T23:22:57ZengEuropean Survey Research AssociationSurvey Research Methods1864-33611864-33612011-04-015111010.18148/srm/2011.v5i1.46224495Testing for measurement equivalence of individuals’ left-right orientationWiebke Weber0Universitat Pompeu FabraSubjective variables such as opinions, attitudes or preferences cannot be measured directly. Researchers have to rely on the answers people give in surveys, and whenever those answers shall be compared it is required that people answer these questions in the same way. Only then a concept can be used in different contexts. This paper deals with the measurement of the left-right concept: it analyses whether people make a distinction between a scale labelled 0 left and 10 right to one which is labelled 0 extreme left and 10 extreme right and tests whether the instrument is equivalent across groups. Following the three steps of invariance testing, configural, metric and scalar invariance, we find that the left-right response scale is on average equivalent across groups with different levels of political interest and different levels of education. This finding holds also in 23 of the 25 European countries tested, with the exception of the eastern part of Germany, Finland and France. In order to estimate how serious the difference between these two groups of countries is, we compare the observed means (which are affected by the difference) to the latent means (which are free of those effects), and the effect of the observed variable “attitude towards government’s intervention in the economy” on the observed variable “left-right self-placement” with the effect between these variables after correcting for scale difference. It was found that countries’ means can be compared but that the relationship with other variables might not be comparable among East Germany, Finland, France and the remaining countries.https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/4622left-right orientationleft-right response scaleresponse functionmeasurement invariancemultiple group confirmatory factor analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wiebke Weber
spellingShingle Wiebke Weber
Testing for measurement equivalence of individuals’ left-right orientation
Survey Research Methods
left-right orientation
left-right response scale
response function
measurement invariance
multiple group confirmatory factor analysis
author_facet Wiebke Weber
author_sort Wiebke Weber
title Testing for measurement equivalence of individuals’ left-right orientation
title_short Testing for measurement equivalence of individuals’ left-right orientation
title_full Testing for measurement equivalence of individuals’ left-right orientation
title_fullStr Testing for measurement equivalence of individuals’ left-right orientation
title_full_unstemmed Testing for measurement equivalence of individuals’ left-right orientation
title_sort testing for measurement equivalence of individuals’ left-right orientation
publisher European Survey Research Association
series Survey Research Methods
issn 1864-3361
1864-3361
publishDate 2011-04-01
description Subjective variables such as opinions, attitudes or preferences cannot be measured directly. Researchers have to rely on the answers people give in surveys, and whenever those answers shall be compared it is required that people answer these questions in the same way. Only then a concept can be used in different contexts. This paper deals with the measurement of the left-right concept: it analyses whether people make a distinction between a scale labelled 0 left and 10 right to one which is labelled 0 extreme left and 10 extreme right and tests whether the instrument is equivalent across groups. Following the three steps of invariance testing, configural, metric and scalar invariance, we find that the left-right response scale is on average equivalent across groups with different levels of political interest and different levels of education. This finding holds also in 23 of the 25 European countries tested, with the exception of the eastern part of Germany, Finland and France. In order to estimate how serious the difference between these two groups of countries is, we compare the observed means (which are affected by the difference) to the latent means (which are free of those effects), and the effect of the observed variable “attitude towards government’s intervention in the economy” on the observed variable “left-right self-placement” with the effect between these variables after correcting for scale difference. It was found that countries’ means can be compared but that the relationship with other variables might not be comparable among East Germany, Finland, France and the remaining countries.
topic left-right orientation
left-right response scale
response function
measurement invariance
multiple group confirmatory factor analysis
url https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/4622
work_keys_str_mv AT wiebkeweber testingformeasurementequivalenceofindividualsleftrightorientation
_version_ 1725566118714671104