Measuring Industry Contributions to Labour Productivity Change: A New Formula in a Chained Fisher Index Framework

Canada and the United States use Fisher indexes in their input-output accounts. Existing methods for decomposing aggregate labour productivity growth into industry contributions in a Fisher index framework either leave some productivity growth unaccounted for or are poorly suited for answering relev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marshall Reinsdorf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre for the Study of Living Standards 2015-04-01
Series:International Productivity Monitor
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.csls.ca/ipm/28/reinsdorf.pdf
id doaj-6484a1f43ee64937b270b92b39e8a272
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6484a1f43ee64937b270b92b39e8a2722020-11-25T03:34:11ZengCentre for the Study of Living StandardsInternational Productivity Monitor1492-97591492-97672015-04-0128326Measuring Industry Contributions to Labour Productivity Change: A New Formula in a Chained Fisher Index FrameworkMarshall Reinsdorf0International Monetary FundCanada and the United States use Fisher indexes in their input-output accounts. Existing methods for decomposing aggregate labour productivity growth into industry contributions in a Fisher index framework either leave some productivity growth unaccounted for or are poorly suited for answering relevant questions about the industry sources of productivity growth. This article derives formulas for analyzing industry contributions to productivity change that add up exactly to the aggregate change in productivity and that have useful economic interpretations. These formulas show that the manufacturing sector made a positive contribution to productivity growth in the Canada in 2000-2010 and in the United States in 1998-2012, whereas the widely used GEAD formula implies that manufacturing made a negative contribution. Methods that can be used to decompose chained Laspeyres measures of productivity growth are also developed. These methods would be applicable in countries other than Canada and the United States.http://www.csls.ca/ipm/28/reinsdorf.pdflabour productivityfisher indexgead formula
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marshall Reinsdorf
spellingShingle Marshall Reinsdorf
Measuring Industry Contributions to Labour Productivity Change: A New Formula in a Chained Fisher Index Framework
International Productivity Monitor
labour productivity
fisher index
gead formula
author_facet Marshall Reinsdorf
author_sort Marshall Reinsdorf
title Measuring Industry Contributions to Labour Productivity Change: A New Formula in a Chained Fisher Index Framework
title_short Measuring Industry Contributions to Labour Productivity Change: A New Formula in a Chained Fisher Index Framework
title_full Measuring Industry Contributions to Labour Productivity Change: A New Formula in a Chained Fisher Index Framework
title_fullStr Measuring Industry Contributions to Labour Productivity Change: A New Formula in a Chained Fisher Index Framework
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Industry Contributions to Labour Productivity Change: A New Formula in a Chained Fisher Index Framework
title_sort measuring industry contributions to labour productivity change: a new formula in a chained fisher index framework
publisher Centre for the Study of Living Standards
series International Productivity Monitor
issn 1492-9759
1492-9767
publishDate 2015-04-01
description Canada and the United States use Fisher indexes in their input-output accounts. Existing methods for decomposing aggregate labour productivity growth into industry contributions in a Fisher index framework either leave some productivity growth unaccounted for or are poorly suited for answering relevant questions about the industry sources of productivity growth. This article derives formulas for analyzing industry contributions to productivity change that add up exactly to the aggregate change in productivity and that have useful economic interpretations. These formulas show that the manufacturing sector made a positive contribution to productivity growth in the Canada in 2000-2010 and in the United States in 1998-2012, whereas the widely used GEAD formula implies that manufacturing made a negative contribution. Methods that can be used to decompose chained Laspeyres measures of productivity growth are also developed. These methods would be applicable in countries other than Canada and the United States.
topic labour productivity
fisher index
gead formula
url http://www.csls.ca/ipm/28/reinsdorf.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT marshallreinsdorf measuringindustrycontributionstolabourproductivitychangeanewformulainachainedfisherindexframework
_version_ 1724560107647270912