A Tale of Two Shitties

Based on 12 months of ethnographic data collection in an anal cancer prevention clinic, this article uses the extreme examples of patients involuntarily defecating through the anoscope during the procedure to highlight the relationship between the extreme and the everyday. Despite the rarity of thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: William Robertson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Extreme Anthropology Research Network 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of Extreme Anthropology
Online Access:https://journals.uio.no/JEA/article/view/8110
id doaj-64844579516347c68a8ce3f46944edcf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-64844579516347c68a8ce3f46944edcf2021-05-29T12:58:23ZengExtreme Anthropology Research NetworkJournal of Extreme Anthropology2535-32412020-12-014210.5617/jea.8110A Tale of Two ShittiesWilliam Robertson0University of Arizona Based on 12 months of ethnographic data collection in an anal cancer prevention clinic, this article uses the extreme examples of patients involuntarily defecating through the anoscope during the procedure to highlight the relationship between the extreme and the everyday. Despite the rarity of this occurrence, I argue that these extreme examples shed light on the ways the daily clinical routines are embodied as an expert habitus. High Resolution Anoscopy procedures are specialized, highly routinized practices that are performed hundreds of times per month at the clinic. These routines result in the development of a clinical habitus that guides physicians in deploying techniques to efficiently conduct the invasive examination. Exemplary examples of ordinary procedures certainly help explain how this expert habitus is enacted through routine clinical practices; however, this expertise becomes especially observable in moments when habituated practices are disrupted, forcing clinicians to react and respond in unscripted ways. I discuss the only two instances of patients defecating through the anoscope that occurred while conducting my research, each with a different clinician. These extreme examples provide rich opportunities to analyze how clinicians with similar procedural habits navigate extraordinary situations in expert and professional but idiosyncratic ways. Whereas exemplary examples of everyday routinized procedures can show the process of developing an expert clinical habitus, these extreme examples more clearly demonstrate how this habitus enacts expertise and professionalism by highlighting the clinicians’ abilities to deftly navigate the technical and sociocultural aspects of such extraordinary disruptions. https://journals.uio.no/JEA/article/view/8110
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author William Robertson
spellingShingle William Robertson
A Tale of Two Shitties
Journal of Extreme Anthropology
author_facet William Robertson
author_sort William Robertson
title A Tale of Two Shitties
title_short A Tale of Two Shitties
title_full A Tale of Two Shitties
title_fullStr A Tale of Two Shitties
title_full_unstemmed A Tale of Two Shitties
title_sort tale of two shitties
publisher Extreme Anthropology Research Network
series Journal of Extreme Anthropology
issn 2535-3241
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Based on 12 months of ethnographic data collection in an anal cancer prevention clinic, this article uses the extreme examples of patients involuntarily defecating through the anoscope during the procedure to highlight the relationship between the extreme and the everyday. Despite the rarity of this occurrence, I argue that these extreme examples shed light on the ways the daily clinical routines are embodied as an expert habitus. High Resolution Anoscopy procedures are specialized, highly routinized practices that are performed hundreds of times per month at the clinic. These routines result in the development of a clinical habitus that guides physicians in deploying techniques to efficiently conduct the invasive examination. Exemplary examples of ordinary procedures certainly help explain how this expert habitus is enacted through routine clinical practices; however, this expertise becomes especially observable in moments when habituated practices are disrupted, forcing clinicians to react and respond in unscripted ways. I discuss the only two instances of patients defecating through the anoscope that occurred while conducting my research, each with a different clinician. These extreme examples provide rich opportunities to analyze how clinicians with similar procedural habits navigate extraordinary situations in expert and professional but idiosyncratic ways. Whereas exemplary examples of everyday routinized procedures can show the process of developing an expert clinical habitus, these extreme examples more clearly demonstrate how this habitus enacts expertise and professionalism by highlighting the clinicians’ abilities to deftly navigate the technical and sociocultural aspects of such extraordinary disruptions.
url https://journals.uio.no/JEA/article/view/8110
work_keys_str_mv AT williamrobertson ataleoftwoshitties
AT williamrobertson taleoftwoshitties
_version_ 1721422095996420096