The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Replication of ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’ by Brooks and Manza

This article reports the results of a replication of Brooks and Manza's "Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies" published in 2006 in the American Sociological Review. The article finds that Brooks and Manza utilized an interaction term but excluded the main effect of o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nate Breznau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Sociological Science 2015-08-01
Series:Sociological Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v2-20-420/
id doaj-647a0b7fb92141e5afb50e166fc764f9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-647a0b7fb92141e5afb50e166fc764f92020-11-24T23:15:49ZengSociety for Sociological ScienceSociological Science2330-66962330-66962015-08-0122042044110.15195/v2.a202825The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Replication of ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’ by Brooks and ManzaNate Breznau0 University of Bremen, Germany This article reports the results of a replication of Brooks and Manza's "Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies" published in 2006 in the American Sociological Review. The article finds that Brooks and Manza utilized an interaction term but excluded the main effect of one of the interacted variables. This model specification has specific implications: statistically, that the omitted main effect variable has no correlation with the residual error term from their regression; theoretically speaking, this means that all unobserved historical, cultural, and other characteristics that distinguish liberal democratic welfare regimes from others can be accounted for with a handful of quantitative measures. Using replicated data, this article finds that the Brooks and Manza models fail these assumptions. A sensitivity analysis using more than 800 regressions with different configurations of variables confirms this. In 99.5 percent of the cases, addition of the main effect removes Brooks and Manza's empirical findings completely. A theoretical discussion illuminates why these findings are not surprising. This article provides a reminder that models and theories are coterminous, each implied by the other.https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v2-20-420/Brooks and ManzaInteraction EffectsPolicy ResponsivenessReplicationSensitivity TestsWelfare States
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nate Breznau
spellingShingle Nate Breznau
The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Replication of ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’ by Brooks and Manza
Sociological Science
Brooks and Manza
Interaction Effects
Policy Responsiveness
Replication
Sensitivity Tests
Welfare States
author_facet Nate Breznau
author_sort Nate Breznau
title The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Replication of ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’ by Brooks and Manza
title_short The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Replication of ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’ by Brooks and Manza
title_full The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Replication of ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’ by Brooks and Manza
title_fullStr The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Replication of ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’ by Brooks and Manza
title_full_unstemmed The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Replication of ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’ by Brooks and Manza
title_sort missing main effect of welfare state regimes: a replication of ‘social policy responsiveness in developed democracies’ by brooks and manza
publisher Society for Sociological Science
series Sociological Science
issn 2330-6696
2330-6696
publishDate 2015-08-01
description This article reports the results of a replication of Brooks and Manza's "Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies" published in 2006 in the American Sociological Review. The article finds that Brooks and Manza utilized an interaction term but excluded the main effect of one of the interacted variables. This model specification has specific implications: statistically, that the omitted main effect variable has no correlation with the residual error term from their regression; theoretically speaking, this means that all unobserved historical, cultural, and other characteristics that distinguish liberal democratic welfare regimes from others can be accounted for with a handful of quantitative measures. Using replicated data, this article finds that the Brooks and Manza models fail these assumptions. A sensitivity analysis using more than 800 regressions with different configurations of variables confirms this. In 99.5 percent of the cases, addition of the main effect removes Brooks and Manza's empirical findings completely. A theoretical discussion illuminates why these findings are not surprising. This article provides a reminder that models and theories are coterminous, each implied by the other.
topic Brooks and Manza
Interaction Effects
Policy Responsiveness
Replication
Sensitivity Tests
Welfare States
url https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v2-20-420/
work_keys_str_mv AT natebreznau themissingmaineffectofwelfarestateregimesareplicationofsocialpolicyresponsivenessindevelopeddemocraciesbybrooksandmanza
AT natebreznau missingmaineffectofwelfarestateregimesareplicationofsocialpolicyresponsivenessindevelopeddemocraciesbybrooksandmanza
_version_ 1725589453836124160