Curricula for empathy and compassion training in medical education: A systematic review.

<h4>Background</h4>Empathy and compassion are vital components of health care quality; however, physicians frequently miss opportunities for empathy and compassion in patient care. Despite evidence that empathy and compassion training can be effective, the specific behaviors that should...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sundip Patel, Alexis Pelletier-Bui, Stephanie Smith, Michael B Roberts, Hope Kilgannon, Stephen Trzeciak, Brian W Roberts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221412
id doaj-6471f650b084427ba2c07b142ec9e174
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6471f650b084427ba2c07b142ec9e1742021-03-04T10:25:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01148e022141210.1371/journal.pone.0221412Curricula for empathy and compassion training in medical education: A systematic review.Sundip PatelAlexis Pelletier-BuiStephanie SmithMichael B RobertsHope KilgannonStephen TrzeciakBrian W Roberts<h4>Background</h4>Empathy and compassion are vital components of health care quality; however, physicians frequently miss opportunities for empathy and compassion in patient care. Despite evidence that empathy and compassion training can be effective, the specific behaviors that should be taught remain unclear. We synthesized the biomedical literature on empathy and compassion training in medical education to find the specific curricula components (skills and behaviors) demonstrated to be effective.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL using a previously published comprehensive search strategy. We screened reference lists of the articles meeting inclusion criteria to identify additional studies for potential inclusion. Study inclusion criteria were: (1) intervention arm in which subjects underwent an educational curriculum aimed at enhancing empathy and/or compassion; (2) clearly defined control arm in which subjects did not receive the curriculum; (3) curriculum was tested on physicians (or physicians-in-training); and (4) outcome measure assessing the effect of the curriculum on physician empathy and/or compassion. We performed a qualitative analysis to collate and tabulate effects of tested curricula according to recommended methodology from the Cochrane Handbook. We used the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias.<h4>Results</h4>Fifty-two studies (total n = 5,316) met inclusion criteria. Most (75%) studies found that the tested curricula improved physician empathy and/or compassion on at least one outcome measure. We identified the following key behaviors to be effective: (1) sitting (versus standing) during the interview; (2) detecting patients' non-verbal cues of emotion; (3) recognizing and responding to opportunities for compassion; (4) non-verbal communication of caring (e.g. eye contact); and (5) verbal statements of acknowledgement, validation, and support. These behaviors were found to improve patient perception of physician empathy and/or compassion.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Evidence suggests that training can enhance physician empathy and compassion. Training curricula should incorporate the specific behaviors identified in this report.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221412
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sundip Patel
Alexis Pelletier-Bui
Stephanie Smith
Michael B Roberts
Hope Kilgannon
Stephen Trzeciak
Brian W Roberts
spellingShingle Sundip Patel
Alexis Pelletier-Bui
Stephanie Smith
Michael B Roberts
Hope Kilgannon
Stephen Trzeciak
Brian W Roberts
Curricula for empathy and compassion training in medical education: A systematic review.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Sundip Patel
Alexis Pelletier-Bui
Stephanie Smith
Michael B Roberts
Hope Kilgannon
Stephen Trzeciak
Brian W Roberts
author_sort Sundip Patel
title Curricula for empathy and compassion training in medical education: A systematic review.
title_short Curricula for empathy and compassion training in medical education: A systematic review.
title_full Curricula for empathy and compassion training in medical education: A systematic review.
title_fullStr Curricula for empathy and compassion training in medical education: A systematic review.
title_full_unstemmed Curricula for empathy and compassion training in medical education: A systematic review.
title_sort curricula for empathy and compassion training in medical education: a systematic review.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description <h4>Background</h4>Empathy and compassion are vital components of health care quality; however, physicians frequently miss opportunities for empathy and compassion in patient care. Despite evidence that empathy and compassion training can be effective, the specific behaviors that should be taught remain unclear. We synthesized the biomedical literature on empathy and compassion training in medical education to find the specific curricula components (skills and behaviors) demonstrated to be effective.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL using a previously published comprehensive search strategy. We screened reference lists of the articles meeting inclusion criteria to identify additional studies for potential inclusion. Study inclusion criteria were: (1) intervention arm in which subjects underwent an educational curriculum aimed at enhancing empathy and/or compassion; (2) clearly defined control arm in which subjects did not receive the curriculum; (3) curriculum was tested on physicians (or physicians-in-training); and (4) outcome measure assessing the effect of the curriculum on physician empathy and/or compassion. We performed a qualitative analysis to collate and tabulate effects of tested curricula according to recommended methodology from the Cochrane Handbook. We used the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias.<h4>Results</h4>Fifty-two studies (total n = 5,316) met inclusion criteria. Most (75%) studies found that the tested curricula improved physician empathy and/or compassion on at least one outcome measure. We identified the following key behaviors to be effective: (1) sitting (versus standing) during the interview; (2) detecting patients' non-verbal cues of emotion; (3) recognizing and responding to opportunities for compassion; (4) non-verbal communication of caring (e.g. eye contact); and (5) verbal statements of acknowledgement, validation, and support. These behaviors were found to improve patient perception of physician empathy and/or compassion.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Evidence suggests that training can enhance physician empathy and compassion. Training curricula should incorporate the specific behaviors identified in this report.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221412
work_keys_str_mv AT sundippatel curriculaforempathyandcompassiontraininginmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT alexispelletierbui curriculaforempathyandcompassiontraininginmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT stephaniesmith curriculaforempathyandcompassiontraininginmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT michaelbroberts curriculaforempathyandcompassiontraininginmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT hopekilgannon curriculaforempathyandcompassiontraininginmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT stephentrzeciak curriculaforempathyandcompassiontraininginmedicaleducationasystematicreview
AT brianwroberts curriculaforempathyandcompassiontraininginmedicaleducationasystematicreview
_version_ 1714806065518870528