The Impact of Behavioral and Structural Remedies on Electricity Prices: The Case of the England and Wales Electricity Market

During the liberalization process the UK regulatory authority introduced a behavioral remedy (through price-cap regulation) and structural remedy (through divestment series) in order to mitigate an exercise of market power and lower the influence of incumbent producers on wholesale electricity price...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sherzod N. Tashpulatov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-12-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/12/3420
id doaj-644b064cb9a242029d1bcbc758d2971b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-644b064cb9a242029d1bcbc758d2971b2020-11-25T00:13:13ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732018-12-011112342010.3390/en11123420en11123420The Impact of Behavioral and Structural Remedies on Electricity Prices: The Case of the England and Wales Electricity MarketSherzod N. Tashpulatov0Department of Economics, Management and Humanities, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 2, 166 27 Prague 6, Czech RepublicDuring the liberalization process the UK regulatory authority introduced a behavioral remedy (through price-cap regulation) and structural remedy (through divestment series) in order to mitigate an exercise of market power and lower the influence of incumbent producers on wholesale electricity prices. We study the impact of these remedies on the dynamics of the wholesale electricity price during the peak-demand period over trading days. An extended autoregressive and autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (<i>AR</i>&#8315;<i>ARCH</i>) model with a novel skew generalized error distribution is used. This distribution allows one to capture the features of asymmetry, excess kurtosis, and heavy tails. The model is extended to include individual incumbent producers&#8217; market shares and other explanatory variables reflecting seasonal patterns and regulatory regimes. We find that the structural remedy was more successful than the behavioral remedy because the effect of market share of the previously larger incumbent producer on the wholesale price is statistically insignificant. Moreover, after the second series of divestments, price volatility reduced.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/12/3420electricity priceuniform price auctionskew generalized error distributionconditional volatilityregulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sherzod N. Tashpulatov
spellingShingle Sherzod N. Tashpulatov
The Impact of Behavioral and Structural Remedies on Electricity Prices: The Case of the England and Wales Electricity Market
Energies
electricity price
uniform price auction
skew generalized error distribution
conditional volatility
regulation
author_facet Sherzod N. Tashpulatov
author_sort Sherzod N. Tashpulatov
title The Impact of Behavioral and Structural Remedies on Electricity Prices: The Case of the England and Wales Electricity Market
title_short The Impact of Behavioral and Structural Remedies on Electricity Prices: The Case of the England and Wales Electricity Market
title_full The Impact of Behavioral and Structural Remedies on Electricity Prices: The Case of the England and Wales Electricity Market
title_fullStr The Impact of Behavioral and Structural Remedies on Electricity Prices: The Case of the England and Wales Electricity Market
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Behavioral and Structural Remedies on Electricity Prices: The Case of the England and Wales Electricity Market
title_sort impact of behavioral and structural remedies on electricity prices: the case of the england and wales electricity market
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2018-12-01
description During the liberalization process the UK regulatory authority introduced a behavioral remedy (through price-cap regulation) and structural remedy (through divestment series) in order to mitigate an exercise of market power and lower the influence of incumbent producers on wholesale electricity prices. We study the impact of these remedies on the dynamics of the wholesale electricity price during the peak-demand period over trading days. An extended autoregressive and autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (<i>AR</i>&#8315;<i>ARCH</i>) model with a novel skew generalized error distribution is used. This distribution allows one to capture the features of asymmetry, excess kurtosis, and heavy tails. The model is extended to include individual incumbent producers&#8217; market shares and other explanatory variables reflecting seasonal patterns and regulatory regimes. We find that the structural remedy was more successful than the behavioral remedy because the effect of market share of the previously larger incumbent producer on the wholesale price is statistically insignificant. Moreover, after the second series of divestments, price volatility reduced.
topic electricity price
uniform price auction
skew generalized error distribution
conditional volatility
regulation
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/12/3420
work_keys_str_mv AT sherzodntashpulatov theimpactofbehavioralandstructuralremediesonelectricitypricesthecaseoftheenglandandwaleselectricitymarket
AT sherzodntashpulatov impactofbehavioralandstructuralremediesonelectricitypricesthecaseoftheenglandandwaleselectricitymarket
_version_ 1725395664250077184