Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?
Residential segregation by income and education is increasing alongside slowly declining black-white segregation. Segregation in urban neighborhood residents’ nonhome activity spaces has not been explored. How integrated are the daily routines of people who live in the same neighborhood? Are people...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Russell Sage Foundation
2017-02-01
|
Series: | RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.rsfjournal.org/doi/full/10.7758/RSF.2017.3.2.09 |
id |
doaj-642fb3e87a534198a632cd14f86f8240 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-642fb3e87a534198a632cd14f86f82402020-11-25T01:51:10ZengRussell Sage FoundationRSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences2377-82532377-82612017-02-013221023110.7758/RSF.2017.3.2.09Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?Christopher R. Browning0Catherine A. Calder1Lauren J. Krivo2Anna L. Smith3Bethany Boettner4The Ohio State UniversityThe Ohio State UniversityRutgers UniversityThe Ohio State UniversityThe Ohio State UniversityResidential segregation by income and education is increasing alongside slowly declining black-white segregation. Segregation in urban neighborhood residents’ nonhome activity spaces has not been explored. How integrated are the daily routines of people who live in the same neighborhood? Are people with different socioeconomic backgrounds that live near one another less likely to share routine activity locations than those of similar education or income? Do these patterns vary across the socioeconomic continuum or by neighborhood structure? The analyses draw on unique data from the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey that identify the location where residents engage in routine activities. Using multilevel p2 (network) models, we analyze pairs of households in the same neighborhood and examine whether the dyad combinations across three levels of SES conduct routine activities in the same location, and whether neighbor socioeconomic similarity in the co-location of routine activities is dependent on the level of neighborhood socioeconomic inequality and trust. Results indicate that, on average, increasing SES diminishes the likelihood of sharing activity locations with any SES group. This pattern is most pronounced in neighborhoods characterized by high levels of socioeconomic inequality. Neighborhood trust explains a nontrivial proportion of the inequality effect on the extent of routine activity sorting by SES. Thus stark, visible neighborhood-level inequality by SES may lead to enhanced effects of distrust on the willingness to share routines across class.http://www.rsfjournal.org/doi/full/10.7758/RSF.2017.3.2.09activity spacessegregationsocioeconomic inequalityneighborhoods |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Christopher R. Browning Catherine A. Calder Lauren J. Krivo Anna L. Smith Bethany Boettner |
spellingShingle |
Christopher R. Browning Catherine A. Calder Lauren J. Krivo Anna L. Smith Bethany Boettner Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines? RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences activity spaces segregation socioeconomic inequality neighborhoods |
author_facet |
Christopher R. Browning Catherine A. Calder Lauren J. Krivo Anna L. Smith Bethany Boettner |
author_sort |
Christopher R. Browning |
title |
Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines? |
title_short |
Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines? |
title_full |
Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines? |
title_fullStr |
Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines? |
title_sort |
socioeconomic segregation of activity spaces in urban neighborhoods: does shared residence mean shared routines? |
publisher |
Russell Sage Foundation |
series |
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences |
issn |
2377-8253 2377-8261 |
publishDate |
2017-02-01 |
description |
Residential segregation by income and education is increasing alongside slowly declining black-white segregation. Segregation in urban neighborhood residents’ nonhome activity spaces has not been explored. How integrated are the daily routines of people who live in the same neighborhood? Are people with different socioeconomic backgrounds that live near one another less likely to share routine activity locations than those of similar education or income? Do these patterns vary across the socioeconomic continuum or by neighborhood structure? The analyses draw on unique data from the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey that identify the location where residents engage in routine activities. Using multilevel p2 (network) models, we analyze pairs of households in the same neighborhood and examine whether the dyad combinations across three levels of SES conduct routine activities in the same location, and whether neighbor socioeconomic similarity in the co-location of routine activities is dependent on the level of neighborhood socioeconomic inequality and trust. Results indicate that, on average, increasing SES diminishes the likelihood of sharing activity locations with any SES group. This pattern is most pronounced in neighborhoods characterized by high levels of socioeconomic inequality. Neighborhood trust explains a nontrivial proportion of the inequality effect on the extent of routine activity sorting by SES. Thus stark, visible neighborhood-level inequality by SES may lead to enhanced effects of distrust on the willingness to share routines across class. |
topic |
activity spaces segregation socioeconomic inequality neighborhoods |
url |
http://www.rsfjournal.org/doi/full/10.7758/RSF.2017.3.2.09 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christopherrbrowning socioeconomicsegregationofactivityspacesinurbanneighborhoodsdoessharedresidencemeansharedroutines AT catherineacalder socioeconomicsegregationofactivityspacesinurbanneighborhoodsdoessharedresidencemeansharedroutines AT laurenjkrivo socioeconomicsegregationofactivityspacesinurbanneighborhoodsdoessharedresidencemeansharedroutines AT annalsmith socioeconomicsegregationofactivityspacesinurbanneighborhoodsdoessharedresidencemeansharedroutines AT bethanyboettner socioeconomicsegregationofactivityspacesinurbanneighborhoodsdoessharedresidencemeansharedroutines |
_version_ |
1724998044489875456 |