Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?

Residential segregation by income and education is increasing alongside slowly declining black-white segregation. Segregation in urban neighborhood residents’ nonhome activity spaces has not been explored. How integrated are the daily routines of people who live in the same neighborhood? Are people...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher R. Browning, Catherine A. Calder, Lauren J. Krivo, Anna L. Smith, Bethany Boettner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russell Sage Foundation 2017-02-01
Series:RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.rsfjournal.org/doi/full/10.7758/RSF.2017.3.2.09
id doaj-642fb3e87a534198a632cd14f86f8240
record_format Article
spelling doaj-642fb3e87a534198a632cd14f86f82402020-11-25T01:51:10ZengRussell Sage FoundationRSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences2377-82532377-82612017-02-013221023110.7758/RSF.2017.3.2.09Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?Christopher R. Browning0Catherine A. Calder1Lauren J. Krivo2Anna L. Smith3Bethany Boettner4The Ohio State UniversityThe Ohio State UniversityRutgers UniversityThe Ohio State UniversityThe Ohio State UniversityResidential segregation by income and education is increasing alongside slowly declining black-white segregation. Segregation in urban neighborhood residents’ nonhome activity spaces has not been explored. How integrated are the daily routines of people who live in the same neighborhood? Are people with different socioeconomic backgrounds that live near one another less likely to share routine activity locations than those of similar education or income? Do these patterns vary across the socioeconomic continuum or by neighborhood structure? The analyses draw on unique data from the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey that identify the location where residents engage in routine activities. Using multilevel p2 (network) models, we analyze pairs of households in the same neighborhood and examine whether the dyad combinations across three levels of SES conduct routine activities in the same location, and whether neighbor socioeconomic similarity in the co-location of routine activities is dependent on the level of neighborhood socioeconomic inequality and trust. Results indicate that, on average, increasing SES diminishes the likelihood of sharing activity locations with any SES group. This pattern is most pronounced in neighborhoods characterized by high levels of socioeconomic inequality. Neighborhood trust explains a nontrivial proportion of the inequality effect on the extent of routine activity sorting by SES. Thus stark, visible neighborhood-level inequality by SES may lead to enhanced effects of distrust on the willingness to share routines across class.http://www.rsfjournal.org/doi/full/10.7758/RSF.2017.3.2.09activity spacessegregationsocioeconomic inequalityneighborhoods
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christopher R. Browning
Catherine A. Calder
Lauren J. Krivo
Anna L. Smith
Bethany Boettner
spellingShingle Christopher R. Browning
Catherine A. Calder
Lauren J. Krivo
Anna L. Smith
Bethany Boettner
Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
activity spaces
segregation
socioeconomic inequality
neighborhoods
author_facet Christopher R. Browning
Catherine A. Calder
Lauren J. Krivo
Anna L. Smith
Bethany Boettner
author_sort Christopher R. Browning
title Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?
title_short Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?
title_full Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?
title_fullStr Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?
title_sort socioeconomic segregation of activity spaces in urban neighborhoods: does shared residence mean shared routines?
publisher Russell Sage Foundation
series RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
issn 2377-8253
2377-8261
publishDate 2017-02-01
description Residential segregation by income and education is increasing alongside slowly declining black-white segregation. Segregation in urban neighborhood residents’ nonhome activity spaces has not been explored. How integrated are the daily routines of people who live in the same neighborhood? Are people with different socioeconomic backgrounds that live near one another less likely to share routine activity locations than those of similar education or income? Do these patterns vary across the socioeconomic continuum or by neighborhood structure? The analyses draw on unique data from the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey that identify the location where residents engage in routine activities. Using multilevel p2 (network) models, we analyze pairs of households in the same neighborhood and examine whether the dyad combinations across three levels of SES conduct routine activities in the same location, and whether neighbor socioeconomic similarity in the co-location of routine activities is dependent on the level of neighborhood socioeconomic inequality and trust. Results indicate that, on average, increasing SES diminishes the likelihood of sharing activity locations with any SES group. This pattern is most pronounced in neighborhoods characterized by high levels of socioeconomic inequality. Neighborhood trust explains a nontrivial proportion of the inequality effect on the extent of routine activity sorting by SES. Thus stark, visible neighborhood-level inequality by SES may lead to enhanced effects of distrust on the willingness to share routines across class.
topic activity spaces
segregation
socioeconomic inequality
neighborhoods
url http://www.rsfjournal.org/doi/full/10.7758/RSF.2017.3.2.09
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherrbrowning socioeconomicsegregationofactivityspacesinurbanneighborhoodsdoessharedresidencemeansharedroutines
AT catherineacalder socioeconomicsegregationofactivityspacesinurbanneighborhoodsdoessharedresidencemeansharedroutines
AT laurenjkrivo socioeconomicsegregationofactivityspacesinurbanneighborhoodsdoessharedresidencemeansharedroutines
AT annalsmith socioeconomicsegregationofactivityspacesinurbanneighborhoodsdoessharedresidencemeansharedroutines
AT bethanyboettner socioeconomicsegregationofactivityspacesinurbanneighborhoodsdoessharedresidencemeansharedroutines
_version_ 1724998044489875456