MODELLING OF CRACK PROPAGATION: COMPARISON OF DISCRETE LATTICE SYSTEM AND COHESIVE ZONE MODEL

Lattice models are often used to analyze materials with discrete micro-structures mainly due to their ability to accurately reflect behaviour of individual fibres or struts and capture macroscopic phenomena such as crack initiation, propagation, or branching. Due to the excessive number of discrete...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karel Mikeš, Franz Bormann, Ondřej Rokoš, Ron H.J. Peerlings
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: CTU Central Library 2020-03-01
Series:Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/APP/article/view/6380
id doaj-642c9724b98447f6b3d25989b4caa82c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-642c9724b98447f6b3d25989b4caa82c2020-11-25T03:10:06ZengCTU Central LibraryActa Polytechnica CTU Proceedings2336-53822020-03-01260394410.14311/APP.2020.26.00394998MODELLING OF CRACK PROPAGATION: COMPARISON OF DISCRETE LATTICE SYSTEM AND COHESIVE ZONE MODELKarel Mikeš0Franz Bormann1Ondřej Rokoš2Ron H.J. Peerlings3Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Mechanics, Thákurova 7, 166 29 Prague 6, Czech RepublicEindhoven University of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The NetherlandsCzech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Mechanics, Thákurova 7, 166 29 Prague 6, Czech Republic Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The NetherlandsEindhoven University of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The NetherlandsLattice models are often used to analyze materials with discrete micro-structures mainly due to their ability to accurately reflect behaviour of individual fibres or struts and capture macroscopic phenomena such as crack initiation, propagation, or branching. Due to the excessive number of discrete interactions, however, such models are often computationally expensive or even intractable for realistic problem dimensions. Simplifications therefore need to be adopted, which allow for efficient yet accurate modelling of engineering applications. For crack propagation modelling, the underlying discrete microstructure is typically replaced with an effective continuum, whereas the crack is inserted as an infinitely thin cohesive zone with a specific traction-separation law. In this work, the accuracy and efficiency of such an effective cohesive zone model is evaluated against the full lattice representation for an example of crack propagation in a three-point bending test. The variational formulation of both models is provided, and obtained results are compared for brittle and ductile behaviour of the underlying lattice in terms of force-displacement curves, crack opening diagrams, and crack length evolutions. The influence of the thickness of the process zone, which is present in the full lattice model but neglected in the effective cohesive zone model, is studied in detail.https://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/APP/article/view/6380lattice model, damage, finite element method, cohesive zone model, three-point-bending test, crack propagation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karel Mikeš
Franz Bormann
Ondřej Rokoš
Ron H.J. Peerlings
spellingShingle Karel Mikeš
Franz Bormann
Ondřej Rokoš
Ron H.J. Peerlings
MODELLING OF CRACK PROPAGATION: COMPARISON OF DISCRETE LATTICE SYSTEM AND COHESIVE ZONE MODEL
Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings
lattice model, damage, finite element method, cohesive zone model, three-point-bending test, crack propagation
author_facet Karel Mikeš
Franz Bormann
Ondřej Rokoš
Ron H.J. Peerlings
author_sort Karel Mikeš
title MODELLING OF CRACK PROPAGATION: COMPARISON OF DISCRETE LATTICE SYSTEM AND COHESIVE ZONE MODEL
title_short MODELLING OF CRACK PROPAGATION: COMPARISON OF DISCRETE LATTICE SYSTEM AND COHESIVE ZONE MODEL
title_full MODELLING OF CRACK PROPAGATION: COMPARISON OF DISCRETE LATTICE SYSTEM AND COHESIVE ZONE MODEL
title_fullStr MODELLING OF CRACK PROPAGATION: COMPARISON OF DISCRETE LATTICE SYSTEM AND COHESIVE ZONE MODEL
title_full_unstemmed MODELLING OF CRACK PROPAGATION: COMPARISON OF DISCRETE LATTICE SYSTEM AND COHESIVE ZONE MODEL
title_sort modelling of crack propagation: comparison of discrete lattice system and cohesive zone model
publisher CTU Central Library
series Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings
issn 2336-5382
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Lattice models are often used to analyze materials with discrete micro-structures mainly due to their ability to accurately reflect behaviour of individual fibres or struts and capture macroscopic phenomena such as crack initiation, propagation, or branching. Due to the excessive number of discrete interactions, however, such models are often computationally expensive or even intractable for realistic problem dimensions. Simplifications therefore need to be adopted, which allow for efficient yet accurate modelling of engineering applications. For crack propagation modelling, the underlying discrete microstructure is typically replaced with an effective continuum, whereas the crack is inserted as an infinitely thin cohesive zone with a specific traction-separation law. In this work, the accuracy and efficiency of such an effective cohesive zone model is evaluated against the full lattice representation for an example of crack propagation in a three-point bending test. The variational formulation of both models is provided, and obtained results are compared for brittle and ductile behaviour of the underlying lattice in terms of force-displacement curves, crack opening diagrams, and crack length evolutions. The influence of the thickness of the process zone, which is present in the full lattice model but neglected in the effective cohesive zone model, is studied in detail.
topic lattice model, damage, finite element method, cohesive zone model, three-point-bending test, crack propagation
url https://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/APP/article/view/6380
work_keys_str_mv AT karelmikes modellingofcrackpropagationcomparisonofdiscretelatticesystemandcohesivezonemodel
AT franzbormann modellingofcrackpropagationcomparisonofdiscretelatticesystemandcohesivezonemodel
AT ondrejrokos modellingofcrackpropagationcomparisonofdiscretelatticesystemandcohesivezonemodel
AT ronhjpeerlings modellingofcrackpropagationcomparisonofdiscretelatticesystemandcohesivezonemodel
_version_ 1724660584031453184