The social dimension in energy landscapes
Abstract If, nowadays, the Communities’ welfare lies in new expressions of collaboration between different types of subjects for the achievement of common objectives, cultural consensus becomes the collective transformation tool to promote regeneration interventions of life contexts encouraged by ne...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2018-10-01
|
Series: | City, Territory and Architecture |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40410-018-0085-5 |
id |
doaj-641eacd67090466e95907c6085cdcf60 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-641eacd67090466e95907c6085cdcf602020-11-24T20:46:37ZengSpringerOpenCity, Territory and Architecture2195-27012018-10-015111110.1186/s40410-018-0085-5The social dimension in energy landscapesAlessandra Bianchi0Elisabetta Ginelli1Bologna Business School, Università degli Studi di BolognaDipartimento di Architettura, Ingegneria delle Costruzioni e Ambiente Costruito, Politecnico di MilanoAbstract If, nowadays, the Communities’ welfare lies in new expressions of collaboration between different types of subjects for the achievement of common objectives, cultural consensus becomes the collective transformation tool to promote regeneration interventions of life contexts encouraged by new social innovation ideas such as products, services and models. This research considers five aspects of the social dimension to define energy systems location and their acceptability. In particular: social equity: as a fair distribution of costs and risks throughout society; spatial equity: as a fair distribution of risks and costs throughout the territory; intergenerational equity: as a proper assessment of the risks that would entail current locations for future generations; procedural equity: when the location decisions and the same decision making process are perceived as legitimate by all concerned; equity structural: when the localization process involves all aspects and interests, leaving no one out for their approaches (Murphy and Stanley 2006). In relation to the analyzed aspects, this study suggests a point of view on the role of reasoning and interpreting the social activity of individuals in relation to bottom-up decision-making processes for the formation of cultural consensus when changes in the usual life and environmental contexts occur.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40410-018-0085-5 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alessandra Bianchi Elisabetta Ginelli |
spellingShingle |
Alessandra Bianchi Elisabetta Ginelli The social dimension in energy landscapes City, Territory and Architecture |
author_facet |
Alessandra Bianchi Elisabetta Ginelli |
author_sort |
Alessandra Bianchi |
title |
The social dimension in energy landscapes |
title_short |
The social dimension in energy landscapes |
title_full |
The social dimension in energy landscapes |
title_fullStr |
The social dimension in energy landscapes |
title_full_unstemmed |
The social dimension in energy landscapes |
title_sort |
social dimension in energy landscapes |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
City, Territory and Architecture |
issn |
2195-2701 |
publishDate |
2018-10-01 |
description |
Abstract If, nowadays, the Communities’ welfare lies in new expressions of collaboration between different types of subjects for the achievement of common objectives, cultural consensus becomes the collective transformation tool to promote regeneration interventions of life contexts encouraged by new social innovation ideas such as products, services and models. This research considers five aspects of the social dimension to define energy systems location and their acceptability. In particular: social equity: as a fair distribution of costs and risks throughout society; spatial equity: as a fair distribution of risks and costs throughout the territory; intergenerational equity: as a proper assessment of the risks that would entail current locations for future generations; procedural equity: when the location decisions and the same decision making process are perceived as legitimate by all concerned; equity structural: when the localization process involves all aspects and interests, leaving no one out for their approaches (Murphy and Stanley 2006). In relation to the analyzed aspects, this study suggests a point of view on the role of reasoning and interpreting the social activity of individuals in relation to bottom-up decision-making processes for the formation of cultural consensus when changes in the usual life and environmental contexts occur. |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40410-018-0085-5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alessandrabianchi thesocialdimensioninenergylandscapes AT elisabettaginelli thesocialdimensioninenergylandscapes AT alessandrabianchi socialdimensioninenergylandscapes AT elisabettaginelli socialdimensioninenergylandscapes |
_version_ |
1716812113268178944 |