The social dimension in energy landscapes

Abstract If, nowadays, the Communities’ welfare lies in new expressions of collaboration between different types of subjects for the achievement of common objectives, cultural consensus becomes the collective transformation tool to promote regeneration interventions of life contexts encouraged by ne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alessandra Bianchi, Elisabetta Ginelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-10-01
Series:City, Territory and Architecture
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40410-018-0085-5
id doaj-641eacd67090466e95907c6085cdcf60
record_format Article
spelling doaj-641eacd67090466e95907c6085cdcf602020-11-24T20:46:37ZengSpringerOpenCity, Territory and Architecture2195-27012018-10-015111110.1186/s40410-018-0085-5The social dimension in energy landscapesAlessandra Bianchi0Elisabetta Ginelli1Bologna Business School, Università degli Studi di BolognaDipartimento di Architettura, Ingegneria delle Costruzioni e Ambiente Costruito, Politecnico di MilanoAbstract If, nowadays, the Communities’ welfare lies in new expressions of collaboration between different types of subjects for the achievement of common objectives, cultural consensus becomes the collective transformation tool to promote regeneration interventions of life contexts encouraged by new social innovation ideas such as products, services and models. This research considers five aspects of the social dimension to define energy systems location and their acceptability. In particular: social equity: as a fair distribution of costs and risks throughout society; spatial equity: as a fair distribution of risks and costs throughout the territory; intergenerational equity: as a proper assessment of the risks that would entail current locations for future generations; procedural equity: when the location decisions and the same decision making process are perceived as legitimate by all concerned; equity structural: when the localization process involves all aspects and interests, leaving no one out for their approaches (Murphy and Stanley 2006). In relation to the analyzed aspects, this study suggests a point of view on the role of reasoning and interpreting the social activity of individuals in relation to bottom-up decision-making processes for the formation of cultural consensus when changes in the usual life and environmental contexts occur.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40410-018-0085-5
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alessandra Bianchi
Elisabetta Ginelli
spellingShingle Alessandra Bianchi
Elisabetta Ginelli
The social dimension in energy landscapes
City, Territory and Architecture
author_facet Alessandra Bianchi
Elisabetta Ginelli
author_sort Alessandra Bianchi
title The social dimension in energy landscapes
title_short The social dimension in energy landscapes
title_full The social dimension in energy landscapes
title_fullStr The social dimension in energy landscapes
title_full_unstemmed The social dimension in energy landscapes
title_sort social dimension in energy landscapes
publisher SpringerOpen
series City, Territory and Architecture
issn 2195-2701
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Abstract If, nowadays, the Communities’ welfare lies in new expressions of collaboration between different types of subjects for the achievement of common objectives, cultural consensus becomes the collective transformation tool to promote regeneration interventions of life contexts encouraged by new social innovation ideas such as products, services and models. This research considers five aspects of the social dimension to define energy systems location and their acceptability. In particular: social equity: as a fair distribution of costs and risks throughout society; spatial equity: as a fair distribution of risks and costs throughout the territory; intergenerational equity: as a proper assessment of the risks that would entail current locations for future generations; procedural equity: when the location decisions and the same decision making process are perceived as legitimate by all concerned; equity structural: when the localization process involves all aspects and interests, leaving no one out for their approaches (Murphy and Stanley 2006). In relation to the analyzed aspects, this study suggests a point of view on the role of reasoning and interpreting the social activity of individuals in relation to bottom-up decision-making processes for the formation of cultural consensus when changes in the usual life and environmental contexts occur.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40410-018-0085-5
work_keys_str_mv AT alessandrabianchi thesocialdimensioninenergylandscapes
AT elisabettaginelli thesocialdimensioninenergylandscapes
AT alessandrabianchi socialdimensioninenergylandscapes
AT elisabettaginelli socialdimensioninenergylandscapes
_version_ 1716812113268178944