A comparison of three modelling approaches for large-scale forest scenario analysis in Finland

Forests play an important role in the sequestration of carbon dioxide and the storage of carbon. The potential and efficiency of mitigation options in forestry have been studied using large-scale forestry scenario models. In Finland, three models have been applied in attempts to estim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nuutinen, Tuula, Kellomäki, Seppo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Society of Forest Science 2001-01-01
Series:Silva Fennica
Online Access:https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/586
id doaj-63fe0cc7bc8547d6b3075eb1d34b8a3c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-63fe0cc7bc8547d6b3075eb1d34b8a3c2020-11-25T02:41:32ZengFinnish Society of Forest ScienceSilva Fennica2242-40752001-01-0135310.14214/sf.586A comparison of three modelling approaches for large-scale forest scenario analysis in FinlandNuutinen, TuulaKellomäki, Seppo Forests play an important role in the sequestration of carbon dioxide and the storage of carbon. The potential and efficiency of mitigation options in forestry have been studied using large-scale forestry scenario models. In Finland, three models have been applied in attempts to estimate timber production and related carbon budgets. In this study, these models are compared. The oldest, MELA, was designed in the 1970s for the regional and national analysis of timber production. The European Forest Information Scenario Model, EFISCEN, originally a Swedish area matrix model, was developed in the early 1980s. SIMA, a gap-type ecosystem model, was utilised in the 1990s for regional predictions on how the changing climate may affect forest growth and timber yield in Finland. In EFISCEN, only the development of growing stock is endogeneous because the assumptions on growth, and the removal and rules for felling are given exogeneously. In the SIMA model, the rules for felling are exogeneous but the growth is modelled based on individual trees reacting to their environment. In the MELA model, the management of forests is endogeneous, i.e. the growth, felling regimes and the development of growing stock are the results of the analysis. The MELA approach integrated with a process-based ecosystem model seems most applicable in the analyses of effective mitigation measures compatible with sustainable forestry under a changing climate. When using the scenarios for the estimation of carbon budget, the policy makers should check that the analyses cover the whole area of interest, and that the assumptions on growth and management together with the definitions applied correspond with the forestry conditions in question.https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/586
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nuutinen, Tuula
Kellomäki, Seppo
spellingShingle Nuutinen, Tuula
Kellomäki, Seppo
A comparison of three modelling approaches for large-scale forest scenario analysis in Finland
Silva Fennica
author_facet Nuutinen, Tuula
Kellomäki, Seppo
author_sort Nuutinen, Tuula
title A comparison of three modelling approaches for large-scale forest scenario analysis in Finland
title_short A comparison of three modelling approaches for large-scale forest scenario analysis in Finland
title_full A comparison of three modelling approaches for large-scale forest scenario analysis in Finland
title_fullStr A comparison of three modelling approaches for large-scale forest scenario analysis in Finland
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of three modelling approaches for large-scale forest scenario analysis in Finland
title_sort comparison of three modelling approaches for large-scale forest scenario analysis in finland
publisher Finnish Society of Forest Science
series Silva Fennica
issn 2242-4075
publishDate 2001-01-01
description Forests play an important role in the sequestration of carbon dioxide and the storage of carbon. The potential and efficiency of mitigation options in forestry have been studied using large-scale forestry scenario models. In Finland, three models have been applied in attempts to estimate timber production and related carbon budgets. In this study, these models are compared. The oldest, MELA, was designed in the 1970s for the regional and national analysis of timber production. The European Forest Information Scenario Model, EFISCEN, originally a Swedish area matrix model, was developed in the early 1980s. SIMA, a gap-type ecosystem model, was utilised in the 1990s for regional predictions on how the changing climate may affect forest growth and timber yield in Finland. In EFISCEN, only the development of growing stock is endogeneous because the assumptions on growth, and the removal and rules for felling are given exogeneously. In the SIMA model, the rules for felling are exogeneous but the growth is modelled based on individual trees reacting to their environment. In the MELA model, the management of forests is endogeneous, i.e. the growth, felling regimes and the development of growing stock are the results of the analysis. The MELA approach integrated with a process-based ecosystem model seems most applicable in the analyses of effective mitigation measures compatible with sustainable forestry under a changing climate. When using the scenarios for the estimation of carbon budget, the policy makers should check that the analyses cover the whole area of interest, and that the assumptions on growth and management together with the definitions applied correspond with the forestry conditions in question.
url https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/586
work_keys_str_mv AT nuutinentuula acomparisonofthreemodellingapproachesforlargescaleforestscenarioanalysisinfinland
AT kellomakiseppo acomparisonofthreemodellingapproachesforlargescaleforestscenarioanalysisinfinland
AT nuutinentuula comparisonofthreemodellingapproachesforlargescaleforestscenarioanalysisinfinland
AT kellomakiseppo comparisonofthreemodellingapproachesforlargescaleforestscenarioanalysisinfinland
_version_ 1724778012258336768