Insertional Torque and Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screws with or without Repositioning: A Porcine Study

Purpose. To evaluate the insertion torque and pullout strength of pedicle screws with or without repositioning. Methods. 20 fresh porcine lumbar vertebrae of similar size were used. The entry point was at the site just lateral and distal to the superior facet joint of the vertebra, and to a depth of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chun Ee Tan, Margaret Woon Man Fok, Keith Dip Kei Luk, Kenneth Man Chee Cheung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2014-08-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901402200223
id doaj-63f8e19fdf924b139bb4302e97e41f79
record_format Article
spelling doaj-63f8e19fdf924b139bb4302e97e41f792020-11-25T03:17:13ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902014-08-012210.1177/230949901402200223Insertional Torque and Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screws with or without Repositioning: A Porcine StudyChun Ee Tan0Margaret Woon Man Fok1Keith Dip Kei Luk2Kenneth Man Chee Cheung3 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Penang Hospital, Penang, Malaysia Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong KongPurpose. To evaluate the insertion torque and pullout strength of pedicle screws with or without repositioning. Methods. 20 fresh porcine lumbar vertebrae of similar size were used. The entry point was at the site just lateral and distal to the superior facet joint of the vertebra, and to a depth of 35 mm. A 6.2-mm-diameter, 35-mm-long pedicle screw was inserted parallel to the superior end plate on one side as control. On the other side, an identical screw was first inserted 10° caudal to the superior end plate, and then repositioned parallel to the superior end plate. The insertional torque and pullout strength were measured. Results. Three of the specimens were excluded owing to pedicle fractures during the pullout test. Repositioned pedicle screws were significantly weaker than controls in terms of the maximum insertional torque (3.20±0.28 vs. 2.04±0.28 Nm, 36% difference, p±0.01) and pullout strength (1664±378 vs. 1391±295 N, p±0.01). Conclusion. Repositioning pedicle screws should be avoided, especially when the pedicle wall is breached. If repositioning is deemed necessary, augmentation with polymethyl methacrylate or a screw with a larger diameter should be considered.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901402200223
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chun Ee Tan
Margaret Woon Man Fok
Keith Dip Kei Luk
Kenneth Man Chee Cheung
spellingShingle Chun Ee Tan
Margaret Woon Man Fok
Keith Dip Kei Luk
Kenneth Man Chee Cheung
Insertional Torque and Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screws with or without Repositioning: A Porcine Study
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Chun Ee Tan
Margaret Woon Man Fok
Keith Dip Kei Luk
Kenneth Man Chee Cheung
author_sort Chun Ee Tan
title Insertional Torque and Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screws with or without Repositioning: A Porcine Study
title_short Insertional Torque and Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screws with or without Repositioning: A Porcine Study
title_full Insertional Torque and Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screws with or without Repositioning: A Porcine Study
title_fullStr Insertional Torque and Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screws with or without Repositioning: A Porcine Study
title_full_unstemmed Insertional Torque and Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screws with or without Repositioning: A Porcine Study
title_sort insertional torque and pullout strength of pedicle screws with or without repositioning: a porcine study
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2014-08-01
description Purpose. To evaluate the insertion torque and pullout strength of pedicle screws with or without repositioning. Methods. 20 fresh porcine lumbar vertebrae of similar size were used. The entry point was at the site just lateral and distal to the superior facet joint of the vertebra, and to a depth of 35 mm. A 6.2-mm-diameter, 35-mm-long pedicle screw was inserted parallel to the superior end plate on one side as control. On the other side, an identical screw was first inserted 10° caudal to the superior end plate, and then repositioned parallel to the superior end plate. The insertional torque and pullout strength were measured. Results. Three of the specimens were excluded owing to pedicle fractures during the pullout test. Repositioned pedicle screws were significantly weaker than controls in terms of the maximum insertional torque (3.20±0.28 vs. 2.04±0.28 Nm, 36% difference, p±0.01) and pullout strength (1664±378 vs. 1391±295 N, p±0.01). Conclusion. Repositioning pedicle screws should be avoided, especially when the pedicle wall is breached. If repositioning is deemed necessary, augmentation with polymethyl methacrylate or a screw with a larger diameter should be considered.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901402200223
work_keys_str_mv AT chuneetan insertionaltorqueandpulloutstrengthofpediclescrewswithorwithoutrepositioningaporcinestudy
AT margaretwoonmanfok insertionaltorqueandpulloutstrengthofpediclescrewswithorwithoutrepositioningaporcinestudy
AT keithdipkeiluk insertionaltorqueandpulloutstrengthofpediclescrewswithorwithoutrepositioningaporcinestudy
AT kennethmancheecheung insertionaltorqueandpulloutstrengthofpediclescrewswithorwithoutrepositioningaporcinestudy
_version_ 1724632629218639872