Does Justice Require a Migration Lottery?

Starting from the observation that substantively free migration is impossible in a world where millions lack the resources to move country, this article evaluates two contenders for the second-best alternative. On the face of it, arguments from freedom of association and material inequality appear t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aveek Bhattacharya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Global Justice Network 2012-05-01
Series:Global justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric
Online Access:https://www.theglobaljusticenetwork.org/index.php/gjn/article/view/27/32
id doaj-63d3da51499644a19668a6980baaf0f8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-63d3da51499644a19668a6980baaf0f82020-11-25T02:32:41ZengGlobal Justice NetworkGlobal justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric1835-68421835-68422012-05-015010.21248/gjn.5.0.2727Does Justice Require a Migration Lottery?Aveek BhattacharyaStarting from the observation that substantively free migration is impossible in a world where millions lack the resources to move country, this article evaluates two contenders for the second-best alternative. On the face of it, arguments from freedom of association and material inequality appear to commend formally open borders, while those from liberty and equality of opportunity seem to favour a migration lottery. However, the argument from liberty gives us only a presumption in favour of freedom of movement, rather than an equal human right. This is not enough to make a compelling case for a migration lottery. Moreover, the idea that equality of opportunity requires a migration lottery rests on the belief that this will facilitate self-realisation. Yet it is free movement which better promotes self-realisation. Therefore, it is concluded that the case for a migration lottery is ultimately unpersuasive.https://www.theglobaljusticenetwork.org/index.php/gjn/article/view/27/32
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aveek Bhattacharya
spellingShingle Aveek Bhattacharya
Does Justice Require a Migration Lottery?
Global justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric
author_facet Aveek Bhattacharya
author_sort Aveek Bhattacharya
title Does Justice Require a Migration Lottery?
title_short Does Justice Require a Migration Lottery?
title_full Does Justice Require a Migration Lottery?
title_fullStr Does Justice Require a Migration Lottery?
title_full_unstemmed Does Justice Require a Migration Lottery?
title_sort does justice require a migration lottery?
publisher Global Justice Network
series Global justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric
issn 1835-6842
1835-6842
publishDate 2012-05-01
description Starting from the observation that substantively free migration is impossible in a world where millions lack the resources to move country, this article evaluates two contenders for the second-best alternative. On the face of it, arguments from freedom of association and material inequality appear to commend formally open borders, while those from liberty and equality of opportunity seem to favour a migration lottery. However, the argument from liberty gives us only a presumption in favour of freedom of movement, rather than an equal human right. This is not enough to make a compelling case for a migration lottery. Moreover, the idea that equality of opportunity requires a migration lottery rests on the belief that this will facilitate self-realisation. Yet it is free movement which better promotes self-realisation. Therefore, it is concluded that the case for a migration lottery is ultimately unpersuasive.
url https://www.theglobaljusticenetwork.org/index.php/gjn/article/view/27/32
work_keys_str_mv AT aveekbhattacharya doesjusticerequireamigrationlottery
_version_ 1724818489964756992