The middle as a voice category in Bantu: Setting the stage for further research

The main goal of our paper is to give a first, general description of middle voice in Bantu. As will be shown, this language group has a set of verbal derivational morphemes that challenges some of the concepts related to the middle domain. First of all, as of yet no description has been found of a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dom Sebastian, Kulikov Leonid, Bostoen Koen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2016-12-01
Series:Lingua Posnaniensis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2016-0012
id doaj-63cac43e6f2d4e158c00d79ef654f0aa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-63cac43e6f2d4e158c00d79ef654f0aa2021-09-06T19:20:04ZengSciendoLingua Posnaniensis2083-60902016-12-0158212914910.1515/linpo-2016-0012linpo-2016-0012The middle as a voice category in Bantu: Setting the stage for further researchDom Sebastian0Kulikov Leonid1Bostoen Koen2Department of Languages and Culture, Ghent University, BelgiumAdam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, PolandDepartment of Languages and Culture, Ghent University, Ghent, BelgiumThe main goal of our paper is to give a first, general description of middle voice in Bantu. As will be shown, this language group has a set of verbal derivational morphemes that challenges some of the concepts related to the middle domain. First of all, as of yet no description has been found of a language having more than one middle marker, yet many Bantu languages have up to four or five derivational morphemes that cover several parts of the semantic domain of the middle. Secondly, provided that the polysemy patterns of these morphemes only partially cover what is generally considered the “canonical” middle domain, we will call these “quasi-middle” markers. The fact that these verbal morphemes also convey notions that are usually not considered to belong to the domain of the canonical middle calls for a reassessment of what constitutes the semantic core of this voice category cross-linguistically. Although the theoretical implications of these new data are not the central focus of our paper, the basic description that we aim to provide of the middle in Bantu can nevertheless contribute to further discussion on this intricate voice category.https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2016-0012bantuintransitivizationmiddle voicequasi-middleverbal morphology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dom Sebastian
Kulikov Leonid
Bostoen Koen
spellingShingle Dom Sebastian
Kulikov Leonid
Bostoen Koen
The middle as a voice category in Bantu: Setting the stage for further research
Lingua Posnaniensis
bantu
intransitivization
middle voice
quasi-middle
verbal morphology
author_facet Dom Sebastian
Kulikov Leonid
Bostoen Koen
author_sort Dom Sebastian
title The middle as a voice category in Bantu: Setting the stage for further research
title_short The middle as a voice category in Bantu: Setting the stage for further research
title_full The middle as a voice category in Bantu: Setting the stage for further research
title_fullStr The middle as a voice category in Bantu: Setting the stage for further research
title_full_unstemmed The middle as a voice category in Bantu: Setting the stage for further research
title_sort middle as a voice category in bantu: setting the stage for further research
publisher Sciendo
series Lingua Posnaniensis
issn 2083-6090
publishDate 2016-12-01
description The main goal of our paper is to give a first, general description of middle voice in Bantu. As will be shown, this language group has a set of verbal derivational morphemes that challenges some of the concepts related to the middle domain. First of all, as of yet no description has been found of a language having more than one middle marker, yet many Bantu languages have up to four or five derivational morphemes that cover several parts of the semantic domain of the middle. Secondly, provided that the polysemy patterns of these morphemes only partially cover what is generally considered the “canonical” middle domain, we will call these “quasi-middle” markers. The fact that these verbal morphemes also convey notions that are usually not considered to belong to the domain of the canonical middle calls for a reassessment of what constitutes the semantic core of this voice category cross-linguistically. Although the theoretical implications of these new data are not the central focus of our paper, the basic description that we aim to provide of the middle in Bantu can nevertheless contribute to further discussion on this intricate voice category.
topic bantu
intransitivization
middle voice
quasi-middle
verbal morphology
url https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2016-0012
work_keys_str_mv AT domsebastian themiddleasavoicecategoryinbantusettingthestageforfurtherresearch
AT kulikovleonid themiddleasavoicecategoryinbantusettingthestageforfurtherresearch
AT bostoenkoen themiddleasavoicecategoryinbantusettingthestageforfurtherresearch
AT domsebastian middleasavoicecategoryinbantusettingthestageforfurtherresearch
AT kulikovleonid middleasavoicecategoryinbantusettingthestageforfurtherresearch
AT bostoenkoen middleasavoicecategoryinbantusettingthestageforfurtherresearch
_version_ 1717777404409151488