Optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation

Abstract Pervasive disparities exist in the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients presenting to hospitals with emergency conditions. This finding has been demonstrated worldwide, and is especially exacerbated in general emergency departments, which treat both adults and children. Polic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aaron Brody, Usha Sethuraman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-04-01
Series:Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13584-019-0305-9
id doaj-63ae8fe29aad4a1a8bfaba28d7cdde3d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-63ae8fe29aad4a1a8bfaba28d7cdde3d2020-11-25T03:18:57ZengBMCIsrael Journal of Health Policy Research2045-40152019-04-01811310.1186/s13584-019-0305-9Optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditationAaron Brody0Usha Sethuraman1Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University School of MedicineDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University School of MedicineAbstract Pervasive disparities exist in the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients presenting to hospitals with emergency conditions. This finding has been demonstrated worldwide, and is especially exacerbated in general emergency departments, which treat both adults and children. Policies to promote appropriate analgesia in the context of pediatric emergency care have been developed by several professional societies and governmental agencies in the United States; however, progress has been uneven, and data regarding these questions is lacking. In their excellent article, Capua and her co-authors address this precise problem through a unique methodology, by surveying nurse directors of both pediatric accredited and non-accredited emergency departments. Survey questions focused on availability of pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities, and on the prevalence with which providers administered both oral and parenteral medications. The results demonstrated widespread availability of evidence based analgesic and anxiolytic treatment, ranging from medical clowns and specific holding positions, to use of intravenous opiates and conscious sedation. No significant differences were found associated with accreditation. These results are surprising and seem to call into question the value of pediatric accreditation. However, an alternative hypothesis would be that accreditation has succeeded, and the results reflect a large spillover effect, in which providers trained in accredited institutions bring these advanced practices to their local departments. Regionalization has been promoted for emergency care of many acute conditions such as trauma, stroke, and myocardial infarction. These results suggest that for pediatric emergencies, at least in regard to analgesia, the answer likely lies in dissemination of knowledge, rather than super specialization. In other words, bring the expertise to the children, not the children to the experts. Further research in this area could focus on optimal ways to achieve such knowledge translation.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13584-019-0305-9PainPediatricEmergencyPediatric emergency medicineAccreditation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aaron Brody
Usha Sethuraman
spellingShingle Aaron Brody
Usha Sethuraman
Optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
Pain
Pediatric
Emergency
Pediatric emergency medicine
Accreditation
author_facet Aaron Brody
Usha Sethuraman
author_sort Aaron Brody
title Optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation
title_short Optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation
title_full Optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation
title_fullStr Optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation
title_sort optimizing the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergencies: the role of accreditation
publisher BMC
series Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
issn 2045-4015
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Abstract Pervasive disparities exist in the treatment of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients presenting to hospitals with emergency conditions. This finding has been demonstrated worldwide, and is especially exacerbated in general emergency departments, which treat both adults and children. Policies to promote appropriate analgesia in the context of pediatric emergency care have been developed by several professional societies and governmental agencies in the United States; however, progress has been uneven, and data regarding these questions is lacking. In their excellent article, Capua and her co-authors address this precise problem through a unique methodology, by surveying nurse directors of both pediatric accredited and non-accredited emergency departments. Survey questions focused on availability of pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities, and on the prevalence with which providers administered both oral and parenteral medications. The results demonstrated widespread availability of evidence based analgesic and anxiolytic treatment, ranging from medical clowns and specific holding positions, to use of intravenous opiates and conscious sedation. No significant differences were found associated with accreditation. These results are surprising and seem to call into question the value of pediatric accreditation. However, an alternative hypothesis would be that accreditation has succeeded, and the results reflect a large spillover effect, in which providers trained in accredited institutions bring these advanced practices to their local departments. Regionalization has been promoted for emergency care of many acute conditions such as trauma, stroke, and myocardial infarction. These results suggest that for pediatric emergencies, at least in regard to analgesia, the answer likely lies in dissemination of knowledge, rather than super specialization. In other words, bring the expertise to the children, not the children to the experts. Further research in this area could focus on optimal ways to achieve such knowledge translation.
topic Pain
Pediatric
Emergency
Pediatric emergency medicine
Accreditation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13584-019-0305-9
work_keys_str_mv AT aaronbrody optimizingthetreatmentofpainandanxietyinpediatricemergenciestheroleofaccreditation
AT ushasethuraman optimizingthetreatmentofpainandanxietyinpediatricemergenciestheroleofaccreditation
_version_ 1724624692256440320