The limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in Indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rights

Voting rights are fundamental rights under Article 28D Paragraphs (1) and (3) as well as Article 28I of the. However, the Indonesian has excluded people with permanent mental disabilities from the right to vote. This article aims to carefully examine whether the Indonesian Constitutional Court’s dec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Diastama Anggita Ramadhan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
Series:Cogent Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1932032
id doaj-63a0014524d541c59124a7b40e7bbb7f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-63a0014524d541c59124a7b40e7bbb7f2021-06-02T08:43:42ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Social Sciences2331-18862021-01-017110.1080/23311886.2021.19320321932032The limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in Indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rightsDiastama Anggita Ramadhan0Universitas DiponegoroVoting rights are fundamental rights under Article 28D Paragraphs (1) and (3) as well as Article 28I of the. However, the Indonesian has excluded people with permanent mental disabilities from the right to vote. This article aims to carefully examine whether the Indonesian Constitutional Court’s decision violates the voting rights of people with permanent mental disabilities. The study used hermeneutic and qualitative content analysis to interpret the 1945 Indonesian Constitution and the judges’ considerations on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XIII/2015. Furthermore, this study examined six countries for comparison concerning unconditional voting rights. This research reveals that the Indonesian Constitutional Court interpreted the law beyond the powers of its authority and violates the voting rights of people with permanent mental disabilities without cogent reasons. The Indonesian government should take measures to facilitate the fulfillment of the voting rights of people with permanent mental disabilities.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1932032limitationvoting rightspeople with permanent mental disabilitiesconstitutional courtindonesia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Diastama Anggita Ramadhan
spellingShingle Diastama Anggita Ramadhan
The limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in Indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rights
Cogent Social Sciences
limitation
voting rights
people with permanent mental disabilities
constitutional court
indonesia
author_facet Diastama Anggita Ramadhan
author_sort Diastama Anggita Ramadhan
title The limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in Indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rights
title_short The limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in Indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rights
title_full The limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in Indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rights
title_fullStr The limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in Indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rights
title_full_unstemmed The limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in Indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rights
title_sort limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rights
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Social Sciences
issn 2331-1886
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Voting rights are fundamental rights under Article 28D Paragraphs (1) and (3) as well as Article 28I of the. However, the Indonesian has excluded people with permanent mental disabilities from the right to vote. This article aims to carefully examine whether the Indonesian Constitutional Court’s decision violates the voting rights of people with permanent mental disabilities. The study used hermeneutic and qualitative content analysis to interpret the 1945 Indonesian Constitution and the judges’ considerations on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XIII/2015. Furthermore, this study examined six countries for comparison concerning unconditional voting rights. This research reveals that the Indonesian Constitutional Court interpreted the law beyond the powers of its authority and violates the voting rights of people with permanent mental disabilities without cogent reasons. The Indonesian government should take measures to facilitate the fulfillment of the voting rights of people with permanent mental disabilities.
topic limitation
voting rights
people with permanent mental disabilities
constitutional court
indonesia
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1932032
work_keys_str_mv AT diastamaanggitaramadhan thelimitationofvotingrightsforpeoplewithpermanentmentaldisabilitiesinindonesiaadebatebetweenreasonableandunreasonablerights
AT diastamaanggitaramadhan limitationofvotingrightsforpeoplewithpermanentmentaldisabilitiesinindonesiaadebatebetweenreasonableandunreasonablerights
_version_ 1721406231998889984