The limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in Indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rights
Voting rights are fundamental rights under Article 28D Paragraphs (1) and (3) as well as Article 28I of the. However, the Indonesian has excluded people with permanent mental disabilities from the right to vote. This article aims to carefully examine whether the Indonesian Constitutional Court’s dec...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Cogent Social Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1932032 |
id |
doaj-63a0014524d541c59124a7b40e7bbb7f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-63a0014524d541c59124a7b40e7bbb7f2021-06-02T08:43:42ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Social Sciences2331-18862021-01-017110.1080/23311886.2021.19320321932032The limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in Indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rightsDiastama Anggita Ramadhan0Universitas DiponegoroVoting rights are fundamental rights under Article 28D Paragraphs (1) and (3) as well as Article 28I of the. However, the Indonesian has excluded people with permanent mental disabilities from the right to vote. This article aims to carefully examine whether the Indonesian Constitutional Court’s decision violates the voting rights of people with permanent mental disabilities. The study used hermeneutic and qualitative content analysis to interpret the 1945 Indonesian Constitution and the judges’ considerations on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XIII/2015. Furthermore, this study examined six countries for comparison concerning unconditional voting rights. This research reveals that the Indonesian Constitutional Court interpreted the law beyond the powers of its authority and violates the voting rights of people with permanent mental disabilities without cogent reasons. The Indonesian government should take measures to facilitate the fulfillment of the voting rights of people with permanent mental disabilities.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1932032limitationvoting rightspeople with permanent mental disabilitiesconstitutional courtindonesia |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Diastama Anggita Ramadhan |
spellingShingle |
Diastama Anggita Ramadhan The limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in Indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rights Cogent Social Sciences limitation voting rights people with permanent mental disabilities constitutional court indonesia |
author_facet |
Diastama Anggita Ramadhan |
author_sort |
Diastama Anggita Ramadhan |
title |
The limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in Indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rights |
title_short |
The limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in Indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rights |
title_full |
The limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in Indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rights |
title_fullStr |
The limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in Indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rights |
title_full_unstemmed |
The limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in Indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rights |
title_sort |
limitation of voting rights for people with permanent mental disabilities in indonesia: a debate between reasonable and unreasonable rights |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Cogent Social Sciences |
issn |
2331-1886 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Voting rights are fundamental rights under Article 28D Paragraphs (1) and (3) as well as Article 28I of the. However, the Indonesian has excluded people with permanent mental disabilities from the right to vote. This article aims to carefully examine whether the Indonesian Constitutional Court’s decision violates the voting rights of people with permanent mental disabilities. The study used hermeneutic and qualitative content analysis to interpret the 1945 Indonesian Constitution and the judges’ considerations on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XIII/2015. Furthermore, this study examined six countries for comparison concerning unconditional voting rights. This research reveals that the Indonesian Constitutional Court interpreted the law beyond the powers of its authority and violates the voting rights of people with permanent mental disabilities without cogent reasons. The Indonesian government should take measures to facilitate the fulfillment of the voting rights of people with permanent mental disabilities. |
topic |
limitation voting rights people with permanent mental disabilities constitutional court indonesia |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1932032 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT diastamaanggitaramadhan thelimitationofvotingrightsforpeoplewithpermanentmentaldisabilitiesinindonesiaadebatebetweenreasonableandunreasonablerights AT diastamaanggitaramadhan limitationofvotingrightsforpeoplewithpermanentmentaldisabilitiesinindonesiaadebatebetweenreasonableandunreasonablerights |
_version_ |
1721406231998889984 |