Notes on Jurisprudence: The Lease of State Private Property and Its Intuitu Personale Nature

<p>Starting from a case of the jurisprudence of the Cluj Court of Appeal, this study probes into the different aspects of the contract of lease for lands pertaining to the State’s private domain (that is, under the Local Council’s management) through which the lessees, in consideration of cert...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ovidiu PODARU
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Babes Bolyai University 2011-10-01
Series:Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/307
id doaj-6390462154414477a606d3375b5ce5e4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6390462154414477a606d3375b5ce5e42021-06-30T05:52:01ZengBabes Bolyai UniversityTransylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences1842-28452011-10-01734175185323Notes on Jurisprudence: The Lease of State Private Property and Its Intuitu Personale NatureOvidiu PODARU0Lecturer, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania<p>Starting from a case of the jurisprudence of the Cluj Court of Appeal, this study probes into the different aspects of the contract of lease for lands pertaining to the State’s private domain (that is, under the Local Council’s management) through which the lessees, in consideration of certain special criteria, procure the right to employ the land for a fixed term of 99 years, in order to build individual housing units. The fundamental issue that needs to be addressed is whether the lesser can one-sidedly increase the rent due to the fact that a third party buyer, to whom the initial lessee sold the building, failed to comply with the special conditions that led to the initial abatement of rent. It is reasonable to assume that such a decision would be illegal taking into account that the lease contract has a civil nature and not an administrative one (as a result the lesser cannot unilaterally alter the contract) and, on the other hand, the fact that this type of contract does not retain its <em>intuitu personae </em>nature throughout its period of enforcement (considering the provisions under art. 41 of Law no. 50/1991 on construction permits), even though that attribute was essential at the moment when the contract was concluded.</p>https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/307state private property, contract of lease, public authorities, abatement of rent, administrative contract, civil contract
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ovidiu PODARU
spellingShingle Ovidiu PODARU
Notes on Jurisprudence: The Lease of State Private Property and Its Intuitu Personale Nature
Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
state private property, contract of lease, public authorities, abatement of rent, administrative contract, civil contract
author_facet Ovidiu PODARU
author_sort Ovidiu PODARU
title Notes on Jurisprudence: The Lease of State Private Property and Its Intuitu Personale Nature
title_short Notes on Jurisprudence: The Lease of State Private Property and Its Intuitu Personale Nature
title_full Notes on Jurisprudence: The Lease of State Private Property and Its Intuitu Personale Nature
title_fullStr Notes on Jurisprudence: The Lease of State Private Property and Its Intuitu Personale Nature
title_full_unstemmed Notes on Jurisprudence: The Lease of State Private Property and Its Intuitu Personale Nature
title_sort notes on jurisprudence: the lease of state private property and its intuitu personale nature
publisher Babes Bolyai University
series Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
issn 1842-2845
publishDate 2011-10-01
description <p>Starting from a case of the jurisprudence of the Cluj Court of Appeal, this study probes into the different aspects of the contract of lease for lands pertaining to the State’s private domain (that is, under the Local Council’s management) through which the lessees, in consideration of certain special criteria, procure the right to employ the land for a fixed term of 99 years, in order to build individual housing units. The fundamental issue that needs to be addressed is whether the lesser can one-sidedly increase the rent due to the fact that a third party buyer, to whom the initial lessee sold the building, failed to comply with the special conditions that led to the initial abatement of rent. It is reasonable to assume that such a decision would be illegal taking into account that the lease contract has a civil nature and not an administrative one (as a result the lesser cannot unilaterally alter the contract) and, on the other hand, the fact that this type of contract does not retain its <em>intuitu personae </em>nature throughout its period of enforcement (considering the provisions under art. 41 of Law no. 50/1991 on construction permits), even though that attribute was essential at the moment when the contract was concluded.</p>
topic state private property, contract of lease, public authorities, abatement of rent, administrative contract, civil contract
url https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/307
work_keys_str_mv AT ovidiupodaru notesonjurisprudencetheleaseofstateprivatepropertyanditsintuitupersonalenature
_version_ 1721353477131599872