Quantifying accumulation characteristics of glutelin and prolamin in rice grains.

Glutelin and prolamin are the two major proteins in rice grains. Grain content of glutelin is considerably higher than that of prolamin in rice, but there is limited information on the factors determining the different grain contents of glutelin and prolamin. To address this knowledge gap, the prese...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Min Huang, Jiana Chen, Fangbo Cao, Zui Tao, Tao Lei, Alin Tian, Yu Liu, Guanghui Chen, Yingbin Zou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220139
id doaj-637e5ee18f91438dba81ef817128a9a1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-637e5ee18f91438dba81ef817128a9a12021-03-03T20:33:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01147e022013910.1371/journal.pone.0220139Quantifying accumulation characteristics of glutelin and prolamin in rice grains.Min HuangJiana ChenFangbo CaoZui TaoTao LeiAlin TianYu LiuGuanghui ChenYingbin ZouGlutelin and prolamin are the two major proteins in rice grains. Grain content of glutelin is considerably higher than that of prolamin in rice, but there is limited information on the factors determining the different grain contents of glutelin and prolamin. To address this knowledge gap, the present study compared final weight per grain and accumulation characteristics of glutelin and prolamin in four rice cultivars. Results showed that final glutelin weight per grain was 3.24-3.95 times higher than final prolamin weight per grain. Glutelin and prolamin accumulation processes were well fitted by the logistic equation. The initial, maximum, and mean accumulation rates of glutelin were 1.69-4.67 times higher than those of prolamin. The active accumulation duration of glutelin was 2.9-5.1 d longer than that of prolamin. These results indicate that both higher accumulation rate and longer active accumulation duration are responsible for the higher final weight per grain of glutelin compared to prolamin in rice.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220139
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Min Huang
Jiana Chen
Fangbo Cao
Zui Tao
Tao Lei
Alin Tian
Yu Liu
Guanghui Chen
Yingbin Zou
spellingShingle Min Huang
Jiana Chen
Fangbo Cao
Zui Tao
Tao Lei
Alin Tian
Yu Liu
Guanghui Chen
Yingbin Zou
Quantifying accumulation characteristics of glutelin and prolamin in rice grains.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Min Huang
Jiana Chen
Fangbo Cao
Zui Tao
Tao Lei
Alin Tian
Yu Liu
Guanghui Chen
Yingbin Zou
author_sort Min Huang
title Quantifying accumulation characteristics of glutelin and prolamin in rice grains.
title_short Quantifying accumulation characteristics of glutelin and prolamin in rice grains.
title_full Quantifying accumulation characteristics of glutelin and prolamin in rice grains.
title_fullStr Quantifying accumulation characteristics of glutelin and prolamin in rice grains.
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying accumulation characteristics of glutelin and prolamin in rice grains.
title_sort quantifying accumulation characteristics of glutelin and prolamin in rice grains.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Glutelin and prolamin are the two major proteins in rice grains. Grain content of glutelin is considerably higher than that of prolamin in rice, but there is limited information on the factors determining the different grain contents of glutelin and prolamin. To address this knowledge gap, the present study compared final weight per grain and accumulation characteristics of glutelin and prolamin in four rice cultivars. Results showed that final glutelin weight per grain was 3.24-3.95 times higher than final prolamin weight per grain. Glutelin and prolamin accumulation processes were well fitted by the logistic equation. The initial, maximum, and mean accumulation rates of glutelin were 1.69-4.67 times higher than those of prolamin. The active accumulation duration of glutelin was 2.9-5.1 d longer than that of prolamin. These results indicate that both higher accumulation rate and longer active accumulation duration are responsible for the higher final weight per grain of glutelin compared to prolamin in rice.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220139
work_keys_str_mv AT minhuang quantifyingaccumulationcharacteristicsofglutelinandprolamininricegrains
AT jianachen quantifyingaccumulationcharacteristicsofglutelinandprolamininricegrains
AT fangbocao quantifyingaccumulationcharacteristicsofglutelinandprolamininricegrains
AT zuitao quantifyingaccumulationcharacteristicsofglutelinandprolamininricegrains
AT taolei quantifyingaccumulationcharacteristicsofglutelinandprolamininricegrains
AT alintian quantifyingaccumulationcharacteristicsofglutelinandprolamininricegrains
AT yuliu quantifyingaccumulationcharacteristicsofglutelinandprolamininricegrains
AT guanghuichen quantifyingaccumulationcharacteristicsofglutelinandprolamininricegrains
AT yingbinzou quantifyingaccumulationcharacteristicsofglutelinandprolamininricegrains
_version_ 1714821764115070976