Determining the residency of companies: Difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’
Even South Africa’s Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962 uses the terminology ‘place of effective management’ when determining the residency of companies. This term is not, however, defined in the said legislation and there is no South African case law specifically dealing with this matter. In contrast, th...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AOSIS
2012-04-01
|
Series: | Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jefjournal.org.za/index.php/jef/article/view/309 |
id |
doaj-63768fa0e3364ec7af3e8464e4b6303f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-63768fa0e3364ec7af3e8464e4b6303f2021-02-02T04:51:34ZengAOSISJournal of Economic and Financial Sciences1995-70762312-28032012-04-015111913410.4102/jef.v5i1.309250Determining the residency of companies: Difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’Nirupa Padia0Warren Maroun1School of Accounting, University of the WitwatersrandSchool of Accounting, University of the WitwatersrandEven South Africa’s Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962 uses the terminology ‘place of effective management’ when determining the residency of companies. This term is not, however, defined in the said legislation and there is no South African case law specifically dealing with this matter. In contrast, the United Kingdom (UK) uses the term ‘central management and control’, and its courts have been called upon to hear numerous cases on the interpretation of this phrase. Given the increasing pressure on South Africa to align its tax treatment with international trends as well as increased levels of trade with the United Kingdom, this study examined the interpretation of ‘place of effective management’ in a South African context and juxtaposed this with the conclusions reached in seven cases in the United Kingdom dealing with the interpretation of ‘centre of management and control’. The findings show that ‘place of effective management’ from a South African perspective may depend heavily on where decisions are implemented and day-to-day operations occur. ‘Central management and control’, however, appears to vest almost exclusively in where primary decisions are made or strategic directions emanate from.https://jefjournal.org.za/index.php/jef/article/view/309micro place of effective managementmanagement and controlcentral management and controlkey decisionsmanagement decisionsday-to-day operations |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nirupa Padia Warren Maroun |
spellingShingle |
Nirupa Padia Warren Maroun Determining the residency of companies: Difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’ Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences micro place of effective management management and control central management and control key decisions management decisions day-to-day operations |
author_facet |
Nirupa Padia Warren Maroun |
author_sort |
Nirupa Padia |
title |
Determining the residency of companies: Difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’ |
title_short |
Determining the residency of companies: Difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’ |
title_full |
Determining the residency of companies: Difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’ |
title_fullStr |
Determining the residency of companies: Difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’ |
title_full_unstemmed |
Determining the residency of companies: Difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’ |
title_sort |
determining the residency of companies: difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’ |
publisher |
AOSIS |
series |
Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences |
issn |
1995-7076 2312-2803 |
publishDate |
2012-04-01 |
description |
Even South Africa’s Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962 uses the terminology ‘place of effective management’ when determining the residency of companies. This term is not, however, defined in the said legislation and there is no South African case law specifically dealing with this matter. In contrast, the United Kingdom (UK) uses the term ‘central management and control’, and its courts have been called upon to hear numerous cases on the interpretation of this phrase. Given the increasing pressure on South Africa to align its tax treatment with international trends as well as increased levels of trade with the United Kingdom, this study examined the interpretation of ‘place of effective management’ in a South African context and juxtaposed this with the conclusions reached in seven cases in the United Kingdom dealing with the interpretation of ‘centre of management and control’. The findings show that ‘place of effective management’ from a South African perspective may depend heavily on where decisions are implemented and day-to-day operations occur. ‘Central management and control’, however, appears to vest almost exclusively in where primary decisions are made or strategic directions emanate from. |
topic |
micro place of effective management management and control central management and control key decisions management decisions day-to-day operations |
url |
https://jefjournal.org.za/index.php/jef/article/view/309 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nirupapadia determiningtheresidencyofcompaniesdifficultiesininterpretingplaceofeffectivemanagement AT warrenmaroun determiningtheresidencyofcompaniesdifficultiesininterpretingplaceofeffectivemanagement |
_version_ |
1724304763041873920 |