Determining the residency of companies: Difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’

Even South Africa’s Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962 uses the terminology ‘place of effective management’ when determining the residency of companies. This term is not, however, defined in the said legislation and there is no South African case law specifically dealing with this matter. In contrast, th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nirupa Padia, Warren Maroun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2012-04-01
Series:Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jefjournal.org.za/index.php/jef/article/view/309
id doaj-63768fa0e3364ec7af3e8464e4b6303f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-63768fa0e3364ec7af3e8464e4b6303f2021-02-02T04:51:34ZengAOSISJournal of Economic and Financial Sciences1995-70762312-28032012-04-015111913410.4102/jef.v5i1.309250Determining the residency of companies: Difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’Nirupa Padia0Warren Maroun1School of Accounting, University of the WitwatersrandSchool of Accounting, University of the WitwatersrandEven South Africa’s Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962 uses the terminology ‘place of effective management’ when determining the residency of companies. This term is not, however, defined in the said legislation and there is no South African case law specifically dealing with this matter. In contrast, the United Kingdom (UK) uses the term ‘central management and control’, and its courts have been called upon to hear numerous cases on the interpretation of this phrase. Given the increasing pressure on South Africa to align its tax treatment with international trends as well as increased levels of trade with the United Kingdom, this study examined the interpretation of ‘place of effective management’ in a South African context and juxtaposed this with the conclusions reached in seven cases in the United Kingdom dealing with the interpretation of ‘centre of management and control’. The findings show that ‘place of effective management’ from a South African perspective may depend heavily on where decisions are implemented and day-to-day operations occur. ‘Central management and control’, however, appears to vest almost exclusively in where primary decisions are made or strategic directions emanate from.https://jefjournal.org.za/index.php/jef/article/view/309micro place of effective managementmanagement and controlcentral management and controlkey decisionsmanagement decisionsday-to-day operations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nirupa Padia
Warren Maroun
spellingShingle Nirupa Padia
Warren Maroun
Determining the residency of companies: Difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’
Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences
micro place of effective management
management and control
central management and control
key decisions
management decisions
day-to-day operations
author_facet Nirupa Padia
Warren Maroun
author_sort Nirupa Padia
title Determining the residency of companies: Difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’
title_short Determining the residency of companies: Difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’
title_full Determining the residency of companies: Difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’
title_fullStr Determining the residency of companies: Difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’
title_full_unstemmed Determining the residency of companies: Difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’
title_sort determining the residency of companies: difficulties in interpreting ‘place of effective management’
publisher AOSIS
series Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences
issn 1995-7076
2312-2803
publishDate 2012-04-01
description Even South Africa’s Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962 uses the terminology ‘place of effective management’ when determining the residency of companies. This term is not, however, defined in the said legislation and there is no South African case law specifically dealing with this matter. In contrast, the United Kingdom (UK) uses the term ‘central management and control’, and its courts have been called upon to hear numerous cases on the interpretation of this phrase. Given the increasing pressure on South Africa to align its tax treatment with international trends as well as increased levels of trade with the United Kingdom, this study examined the interpretation of ‘place of effective management’ in a South African context and juxtaposed this with the conclusions reached in seven cases in the United Kingdom dealing with the interpretation of ‘centre of management and control’. The findings show that ‘place of effective management’ from a South African perspective may depend heavily on where decisions are implemented and day-to-day operations occur. ‘Central management and control’, however, appears to vest almost exclusively in where primary decisions are made or strategic directions emanate from.
topic micro place of effective management
management and control
central management and control
key decisions
management decisions
day-to-day operations
url https://jefjournal.org.za/index.php/jef/article/view/309
work_keys_str_mv AT nirupapadia determiningtheresidencyofcompaniesdifficultiesininterpretingplaceofeffectivemanagement
AT warrenmaroun determiningtheresidencyofcompaniesdifficultiesininterpretingplaceofeffectivemanagement
_version_ 1724304763041873920