Differentiating between near- and non-cognate codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Decoding of mRNAs is performed by aminoacyl tRNAs (aa-tRNAs). This process is highly accurate, however, at low frequencies (10(-3) - 10(-4)) the wrong aa-tRNA can be selected, leading to incorporation of aberrant amino acids. Although our understanding of what constitutes the correct or cognate aa-t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ewan P Plant, Phuc Nguyen, Jonathan R Russ, Yvette R Pittman, Thai Nguyen, Jack T Quesinberry, Terri Goss Kinzy, Jonathan D Dinman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2007-06-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1885216?pdf=render
id doaj-63585af5da8644929014b79990ede41d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-63585af5da8644929014b79990ede41d2020-11-25T01:46:09ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032007-06-0126e51710.1371/journal.pone.0000517Differentiating between near- and non-cognate codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Ewan P PlantPhuc NguyenJonathan R RussYvette R PittmanThai NguyenJack T QuesinberryTerri Goss KinzyJonathan D DinmanDecoding of mRNAs is performed by aminoacyl tRNAs (aa-tRNAs). This process is highly accurate, however, at low frequencies (10(-3) - 10(-4)) the wrong aa-tRNA can be selected, leading to incorporation of aberrant amino acids. Although our understanding of what constitutes the correct or cognate aa-tRNA:mRNA interaction is well defined, a functional distinction between near-cognate or single mismatched, and unpaired or non-cognate interactions is lacking.Misreading of several synonymous codon substitutions at the catalytic site of firefly luciferase was assayed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Analysis of the results in the context of current kinetic and biophysical models of aa-tRNA selection suggests that the defining feature of near-cognate aa-tRNAs is their potential to form mini-helical structures with A-site codons, enabling stimulation of GTPase activity of eukaryotic Elongation Factor 1A (eEF1A). Paromomycin specifically stimulated misreading of near-cognate but not of non-cognate aa-tRNAs, providing a functional probe to distinguish between these two classes. Deletion of the accessory elongation factor eEF1Bgamma promoted increased misreading of near-cognate, but hyperaccurate reading of non-cognate codons, suggesting that this factor also has a role in tRNA discrimination. A mutant of eEF1Balpha, the nucleotide exchange factor for eEF1A, promoted a general increase in fidelity, suggesting that the decreased rates of elongation may provide more time for discrimination between aa-tRNAs. A mutant form of ribosomal protein L5 promoted hyperaccurate decoding of both types of codons, even though it is topologically distant from the decoding center.It is important to distinguish between near-cognate and non-cognate mRNA:tRNA interactions, because such a definition may be important for informing therapeutic strategies for suppressing these two different categories of mutations underlying many human diseases. This study suggests that the defining feature of near-cognate aa-tRNAs is their potential to form mini-helical structures with A-site codons in the ribosomal decoding center. An aminoglycoside and a ribosomal factor can be used to distinguish between near-cognate and non-cognate interactions.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1885216?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ewan P Plant
Phuc Nguyen
Jonathan R Russ
Yvette R Pittman
Thai Nguyen
Jack T Quesinberry
Terri Goss Kinzy
Jonathan D Dinman
spellingShingle Ewan P Plant
Phuc Nguyen
Jonathan R Russ
Yvette R Pittman
Thai Nguyen
Jack T Quesinberry
Terri Goss Kinzy
Jonathan D Dinman
Differentiating between near- and non-cognate codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ewan P Plant
Phuc Nguyen
Jonathan R Russ
Yvette R Pittman
Thai Nguyen
Jack T Quesinberry
Terri Goss Kinzy
Jonathan D Dinman
author_sort Ewan P Plant
title Differentiating between near- and non-cognate codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
title_short Differentiating between near- and non-cognate codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
title_full Differentiating between near- and non-cognate codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
title_fullStr Differentiating between near- and non-cognate codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
title_full_unstemmed Differentiating between near- and non-cognate codons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
title_sort differentiating between near- and non-cognate codons in saccharomyces cerevisiae.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2007-06-01
description Decoding of mRNAs is performed by aminoacyl tRNAs (aa-tRNAs). This process is highly accurate, however, at low frequencies (10(-3) - 10(-4)) the wrong aa-tRNA can be selected, leading to incorporation of aberrant amino acids. Although our understanding of what constitutes the correct or cognate aa-tRNA:mRNA interaction is well defined, a functional distinction between near-cognate or single mismatched, and unpaired or non-cognate interactions is lacking.Misreading of several synonymous codon substitutions at the catalytic site of firefly luciferase was assayed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Analysis of the results in the context of current kinetic and biophysical models of aa-tRNA selection suggests that the defining feature of near-cognate aa-tRNAs is their potential to form mini-helical structures with A-site codons, enabling stimulation of GTPase activity of eukaryotic Elongation Factor 1A (eEF1A). Paromomycin specifically stimulated misreading of near-cognate but not of non-cognate aa-tRNAs, providing a functional probe to distinguish between these two classes. Deletion of the accessory elongation factor eEF1Bgamma promoted increased misreading of near-cognate, but hyperaccurate reading of non-cognate codons, suggesting that this factor also has a role in tRNA discrimination. A mutant of eEF1Balpha, the nucleotide exchange factor for eEF1A, promoted a general increase in fidelity, suggesting that the decreased rates of elongation may provide more time for discrimination between aa-tRNAs. A mutant form of ribosomal protein L5 promoted hyperaccurate decoding of both types of codons, even though it is topologically distant from the decoding center.It is important to distinguish between near-cognate and non-cognate mRNA:tRNA interactions, because such a definition may be important for informing therapeutic strategies for suppressing these two different categories of mutations underlying many human diseases. This study suggests that the defining feature of near-cognate aa-tRNAs is their potential to form mini-helical structures with A-site codons in the ribosomal decoding center. An aminoglycoside and a ribosomal factor can be used to distinguish between near-cognate and non-cognate interactions.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1885216?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ewanpplant differentiatingbetweennearandnoncognatecodonsinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT phucnguyen differentiatingbetweennearandnoncognatecodonsinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT jonathanrruss differentiatingbetweennearandnoncognatecodonsinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT yvetterpittman differentiatingbetweennearandnoncognatecodonsinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT thainguyen differentiatingbetweennearandnoncognatecodonsinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT jacktquesinberry differentiatingbetweennearandnoncognatecodonsinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT terrigosskinzy differentiatingbetweennearandnoncognatecodonsinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT jonathanddinman differentiatingbetweennearandnoncognatecodonsinsaccharomycescerevisiae
_version_ 1725020666188529664