On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: Estimating the analytic flexibility of fMRI experiments.
How likely are published findings in the functional neuroimaging literature to be false? According to a recent mathematical model, the potential for false positives increases with the flexibility of analysis methods. Functional MRI (fMRI) experiments can be analyzed using a large number of commonly...
Main Author: | Joshua eCarp |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149/full |
Similar Items
-
Pooling fMRI data: meta-analysis, mega-analysis and multi-center studies
by: Sergi G Costafreda
Published: (2009-09-01) -
Where Are the fMRI Correlates of Phosphene Perception?
by: Tom A. de Graaf, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
A short, robust brain activation control task optimised for pharmacological fMRI studies
by: Jessica-Lily Harvey, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Efficient fMRI Analysis and Clustering on GPUs
by: Talasu, Dharneesh
Published: (2011) -
Commentary: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates
by: Karsten Mueller, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01)