'No Thanks': a Socio-Semiotic Approach

This contribution argues for a socio-semiotic approach to natural-language communication which focuses on the connectedness between linguistic code and social and sociocultural practice. Section 1 investigates natural language communication with regard to propositional, interpersonal and interaction...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anita Fetzer
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Bern Open Publishing 2003-03-01
Series:Linguistik Online
Online Access:https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/827
id doaj-6349f61d722344c8997358090801864e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6349f61d722344c8997358090801864e2021-09-13T12:57:14ZdeuBern Open PublishingLinguistik Online1615-30142003-03-0114210.13092/lo.14.827'No Thanks': a Socio-Semiotic ApproachAnita FetzerThis contribution argues for a socio-semiotic approach to natural-language communication which focuses on the connectedness between linguistic code and social and sociocultural practice. Section 1 investigates natural language communication with regard to propositional, interpersonal and interactional meaning from both code and inference-model viewpoints. The results of this discussion are accommodated in the redefinition of two of the most important premises of pragmatics, i.e. rationality and intentionality. In section 2, the interdependence of culture, context and communication is analysed in the framework of ethnomethodology, in which the linguistic realization of an utterance and its degree of contextualization are examined with regard to encoding, decoding, inference and implicature. In section 3 the phenomenon of communicative strategy is analysed in a socio-semiotic framework and special attention is given to the speech acts of denial and rejection. Communicative strategies are defined within the framework of preference organization and classified with regard to their preferred and dispreferred modes of linguistic representation and interpretation. In section 4, the results of the investigation of denials and rejections are systematized in the framework of the dialogue act of a plus/minus validity claim, which is based on Habermas' approach to communication (1987) and Halliday's functional interpretation of language (1996). In the conclusion, culture is defined as both a macro and a micro concept, and is created in and through the process of communication. Linguistic code and sociocultural practice are context-dependent by definition: they are anchored to linguistic contexts, which are embedded in sociocultural contexts, which are embedded in social contexts Thus, the macro concept of culture and its context-dependent manifestation as particular cultural values are reflected in particular communicative strategies which are interdependent on the presentation of self in everyday life (Goffman 1971). https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/827
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anita Fetzer
spellingShingle Anita Fetzer
'No Thanks': a Socio-Semiotic Approach
Linguistik Online
author_facet Anita Fetzer
author_sort Anita Fetzer
title 'No Thanks': a Socio-Semiotic Approach
title_short 'No Thanks': a Socio-Semiotic Approach
title_full 'No Thanks': a Socio-Semiotic Approach
title_fullStr 'No Thanks': a Socio-Semiotic Approach
title_full_unstemmed 'No Thanks': a Socio-Semiotic Approach
title_sort 'no thanks': a socio-semiotic approach
publisher Bern Open Publishing
series Linguistik Online
issn 1615-3014
publishDate 2003-03-01
description This contribution argues for a socio-semiotic approach to natural-language communication which focuses on the connectedness between linguistic code and social and sociocultural practice. Section 1 investigates natural language communication with regard to propositional, interpersonal and interactional meaning from both code and inference-model viewpoints. The results of this discussion are accommodated in the redefinition of two of the most important premises of pragmatics, i.e. rationality and intentionality. In section 2, the interdependence of culture, context and communication is analysed in the framework of ethnomethodology, in which the linguistic realization of an utterance and its degree of contextualization are examined with regard to encoding, decoding, inference and implicature. In section 3 the phenomenon of communicative strategy is analysed in a socio-semiotic framework and special attention is given to the speech acts of denial and rejection. Communicative strategies are defined within the framework of preference organization and classified with regard to their preferred and dispreferred modes of linguistic representation and interpretation. In section 4, the results of the investigation of denials and rejections are systematized in the framework of the dialogue act of a plus/minus validity claim, which is based on Habermas' approach to communication (1987) and Halliday's functional interpretation of language (1996). In the conclusion, culture is defined as both a macro and a micro concept, and is created in and through the process of communication. Linguistic code and sociocultural practice are context-dependent by definition: they are anchored to linguistic contexts, which are embedded in sociocultural contexts, which are embedded in social contexts Thus, the macro concept of culture and its context-dependent manifestation as particular cultural values are reflected in particular communicative strategies which are interdependent on the presentation of self in everyday life (Goffman 1971).
url https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/827
work_keys_str_mv AT anitafetzer nothanksasociosemioticapproach
_version_ 1717380688123002880