A comparison of four scoring methods based on the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as used in the Dutch preventive child health care system

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Validated questionnaires can support the identification of psychosocial problems by the Preventive Child Health Care (PCH) system. This study assesses the validity and added value of four scoring methods used with the Strengths and D...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Treffers Philip DA, Hoekstra Femke, Vogels Anton GC, Crone Mathilde R, Reijneveld Sijmen A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-04-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/8/106
id doaj-6347e001d9984f71b9a52646668e56f0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6347e001d9984f71b9a52646668e56f02020-11-24T21:40:51ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582008-04-018110610.1186/1471-2458-8-106A comparison of four scoring methods based on the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as used in the Dutch preventive child health care systemTreffers Philip DAHoekstra FemkeVogels Anton GCCrone Mathilde RReijneveld Sijmen A<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Validated questionnaires can support the identification of psychosocial problems by the Preventive Child Health Care (PCH) system. This study assesses the validity and added value of four scoring methods used with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for the identification of psychosocial problems among children aged 7–12 by the PCH.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We included 711 (of 814) children (response: 87%) aged 7–12 undergoing routine health assessments in nine PCH services across the Netherlands. Child health professionals interviewed and examined children and parents. Prior to the interview, parents completed the SDQ and the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL), which were not shown to the professionals. The CBCL and data about the child's current treatment status were used as criteria for the validity of the SDQ. We used four SDQ scoring approaches: an elevated SDQ Total Difficulties Score (TDS), parent-defined difficulties, an elevated score for emotional symptoms, conduct problems or hyperactivity in combination with a high impairment score, and a combined score: an elevated score for any of these three methods.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The Cohen's Kappa ranged from 0.33 to 0.64 for the four scoring methods with the CBCL scores and treatment status, generally indicating a moderate to good agreement. All four methods added significantly to the identification of problems by the PCH. Classification based on the TDS yielded results similar to more complicated methods.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The SDQ is a valid tool for the identification of psychosocial problems by PCH. As a first step, the use of a simple classification based on the SDQ TDS is recommended.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/8/106
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Treffers Philip DA
Hoekstra Femke
Vogels Anton GC
Crone Mathilde R
Reijneveld Sijmen A
spellingShingle Treffers Philip DA
Hoekstra Femke
Vogels Anton GC
Crone Mathilde R
Reijneveld Sijmen A
A comparison of four scoring methods based on the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as used in the Dutch preventive child health care system
BMC Public Health
author_facet Treffers Philip DA
Hoekstra Femke
Vogels Anton GC
Crone Mathilde R
Reijneveld Sijmen A
author_sort Treffers Philip DA
title A comparison of four scoring methods based on the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as used in the Dutch preventive child health care system
title_short A comparison of four scoring methods based on the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as used in the Dutch preventive child health care system
title_full A comparison of four scoring methods based on the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as used in the Dutch preventive child health care system
title_fullStr A comparison of four scoring methods based on the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as used in the Dutch preventive child health care system
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of four scoring methods based on the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as used in the Dutch preventive child health care system
title_sort comparison of four scoring methods based on the parent-rated strengths and difficulties questionnaire as used in the dutch preventive child health care system
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2008-04-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Validated questionnaires can support the identification of psychosocial problems by the Preventive Child Health Care (PCH) system. This study assesses the validity and added value of four scoring methods used with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for the identification of psychosocial problems among children aged 7–12 by the PCH.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We included 711 (of 814) children (response: 87%) aged 7–12 undergoing routine health assessments in nine PCH services across the Netherlands. Child health professionals interviewed and examined children and parents. Prior to the interview, parents completed the SDQ and the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL), which were not shown to the professionals. The CBCL and data about the child's current treatment status were used as criteria for the validity of the SDQ. We used four SDQ scoring approaches: an elevated SDQ Total Difficulties Score (TDS), parent-defined difficulties, an elevated score for emotional symptoms, conduct problems or hyperactivity in combination with a high impairment score, and a combined score: an elevated score for any of these three methods.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The Cohen's Kappa ranged from 0.33 to 0.64 for the four scoring methods with the CBCL scores and treatment status, generally indicating a moderate to good agreement. All four methods added significantly to the identification of problems by the PCH. Classification based on the TDS yielded results similar to more complicated methods.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The SDQ is a valid tool for the identification of psychosocial problems by PCH. As a first step, the use of a simple classification based on the SDQ TDS is recommended.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/8/106
work_keys_str_mv AT treffersphilipda acomparisonoffourscoringmethodsbasedontheparentratedstrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireasusedinthedutchpreventivechildhealthcaresystem
AT hoekstrafemke acomparisonoffourscoringmethodsbasedontheparentratedstrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireasusedinthedutchpreventivechildhealthcaresystem
AT vogelsantongc acomparisonoffourscoringmethodsbasedontheparentratedstrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireasusedinthedutchpreventivechildhealthcaresystem
AT cronemathilder acomparisonoffourscoringmethodsbasedontheparentratedstrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireasusedinthedutchpreventivechildhealthcaresystem
AT reijneveldsijmena acomparisonoffourscoringmethodsbasedontheparentratedstrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireasusedinthedutchpreventivechildhealthcaresystem
AT treffersphilipda comparisonoffourscoringmethodsbasedontheparentratedstrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireasusedinthedutchpreventivechildhealthcaresystem
AT hoekstrafemke comparisonoffourscoringmethodsbasedontheparentratedstrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireasusedinthedutchpreventivechildhealthcaresystem
AT vogelsantongc comparisonoffourscoringmethodsbasedontheparentratedstrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireasusedinthedutchpreventivechildhealthcaresystem
AT cronemathilder comparisonoffourscoringmethodsbasedontheparentratedstrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireasusedinthedutchpreventivechildhealthcaresystem
AT reijneveldsijmena comparisonoffourscoringmethodsbasedontheparentratedstrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireasusedinthedutchpreventivechildhealthcaresystem
_version_ 1725924317142712320