Developing South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system: First lessons learned

This article describes the development of the national evaluation system in South Africa, which has been implemented since 2012, led by the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME, previously the Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation) in the Presidency. It suggests emer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ian Goldman, Jabulani E. Mathe, Christel Jacob, Antonio Hercules, Matodzi Amisi, Thabani Buthelezi, Hersheela Narsee, Stanley Ntakumba, Mastoera Sadan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2015-07-01
Series:African Evaluation Journal
Online Access:https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/107
id doaj-63214ca1ae0b402b978f8219188ae054
record_format Article
spelling doaj-63214ca1ae0b402b978f8219188ae0542020-11-24T21:05:15ZengAOSISAfrican Evaluation Journal2310-49882306-51332015-07-0131e1e910.4102/aej.v3i1.10730Developing South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system: First lessons learnedIan Goldman0Jabulani E. Mathe1Christel Jacob2Antonio Hercules3Matodzi Amisi4Thabani Buthelezi5Hersheela Narsee6Stanley Ntakumba7Mastoera Sadan8Evaluation and Research, Department of Planning, Monitoring and EvaluationEvaluation and Research, Department of Planning, Monitoring and EvaluationEvaluation and Research, Department of Planning, Monitoring and EvaluationEvaluation and Research, Department of Planning, Monitoring and EvaluationEvaluation and Research, Department of Planning, Monitoring and EvaluationDepartment of Social DevelopmentDepartment of Higher Education and TrainingEvaluation and Research, Department of Planning, Monitoring and EvaluationEvaluation and Research, Department of Planning, Monitoring and EvaluationThis article describes the development of the national evaluation system in South Africa, which has been implemented since 2012, led by the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME, previously the Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation) in the Presidency. It suggests emerging results but an evaluation of the evaluation being carried out in 2015 will address this formally. Responding to dissatisfaction with government services, in 2009 the government placed a major emphasis on monitoring and evaluation (M&E). A ministry and department were created, initially focusing on monitoring but in 2011 developing a national evaluation policy framework, which has been rolled out from 2012. The system has focused on improving performance, as well as improved accountability. Evaluations are proposed by national government departments and selected for a national evaluation plan. The relevant department implements the evaluations with the DPME and findings go to Cabinet and are made public. So far 39 evaluations have been completed or are underway, covering around R50 billion (approximately $5 billion) of government expenditure over a three-year expenditure framework. There is evidence that the first evaluations to be completed are having significant influence on the programmes concerned. The big challenge facing South Africa is to increase capacity of service providers and government staff so as to be able to have more and better quality evaluations taking place outside of as well as through the DPME.https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/107
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ian Goldman
Jabulani E. Mathe
Christel Jacob
Antonio Hercules
Matodzi Amisi
Thabani Buthelezi
Hersheela Narsee
Stanley Ntakumba
Mastoera Sadan
spellingShingle Ian Goldman
Jabulani E. Mathe
Christel Jacob
Antonio Hercules
Matodzi Amisi
Thabani Buthelezi
Hersheela Narsee
Stanley Ntakumba
Mastoera Sadan
Developing South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system: First lessons learned
African Evaluation Journal
author_facet Ian Goldman
Jabulani E. Mathe
Christel Jacob
Antonio Hercules
Matodzi Amisi
Thabani Buthelezi
Hersheela Narsee
Stanley Ntakumba
Mastoera Sadan
author_sort Ian Goldman
title Developing South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system: First lessons learned
title_short Developing South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system: First lessons learned
title_full Developing South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system: First lessons learned
title_fullStr Developing South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system: First lessons learned
title_full_unstemmed Developing South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system: First lessons learned
title_sort developing south africa’s national evaluation policy and system: first lessons learned
publisher AOSIS
series African Evaluation Journal
issn 2310-4988
2306-5133
publishDate 2015-07-01
description This article describes the development of the national evaluation system in South Africa, which has been implemented since 2012, led by the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME, previously the Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation) in the Presidency. It suggests emerging results but an evaluation of the evaluation being carried out in 2015 will address this formally. Responding to dissatisfaction with government services, in 2009 the government placed a major emphasis on monitoring and evaluation (M&E). A ministry and department were created, initially focusing on monitoring but in 2011 developing a national evaluation policy framework, which has been rolled out from 2012. The system has focused on improving performance, as well as improved accountability. Evaluations are proposed by national government departments and selected for a national evaluation plan. The relevant department implements the evaluations with the DPME and findings go to Cabinet and are made public. So far 39 evaluations have been completed or are underway, covering around R50 billion (approximately $5 billion) of government expenditure over a three-year expenditure framework. There is evidence that the first evaluations to be completed are having significant influence on the programmes concerned. The big challenge facing South Africa is to increase capacity of service providers and government staff so as to be able to have more and better quality evaluations taking place outside of as well as through the DPME.
url https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/107
work_keys_str_mv AT iangoldman developingsouthafricasnationalevaluationpolicyandsystemfirstlessonslearned
AT jabulaniemathe developingsouthafricasnationalevaluationpolicyandsystemfirstlessonslearned
AT christeljacob developingsouthafricasnationalevaluationpolicyandsystemfirstlessonslearned
AT antoniohercules developingsouthafricasnationalevaluationpolicyandsystemfirstlessonslearned
AT matodziamisi developingsouthafricasnationalevaluationpolicyandsystemfirstlessonslearned
AT thabanibuthelezi developingsouthafricasnationalevaluationpolicyandsystemfirstlessonslearned
AT hersheelanarsee developingsouthafricasnationalevaluationpolicyandsystemfirstlessonslearned
AT stanleyntakumba developingsouthafricasnationalevaluationpolicyandsystemfirstlessonslearned
AT mastoerasadan developingsouthafricasnationalevaluationpolicyandsystemfirstlessonslearned
_version_ 1716769450528604160