Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has rapidly grown in notoriety and popularity worldwide as a treatment for both recurrent and refractory C. difficile infection (CDI), as well as for a myriad of other indications, with varying levels of evidence to justify its use. At present, FMT use in the U...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Medicine in Microecology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590097820300240 |
id |
doaj-631f2a83e3544d8ba09bf1196ba0da43 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-631f2a83e3544d8ba09bf1196ba0da432020-12-31T04:44:07ZengElsevierMedicine in Microecology2590-09782020-12-016100027Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethicsZoya Grigoryan0Michael J. Shen1Shaina W. Twardus2Marc M. Beuttler3Lea Ann Chen4Alison Bateman-House5Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 462 First Avenue, 10E1, New York, NY, 10016, USADivision of Medical Ethics, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USADivision of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge St Floor 9, Boston, MA 02114; Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge St Floor 7, Boston, MA, 02114, USADivision of Medical Ethics, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA; Department of Dermatology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, 1542 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USADivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 462 First Avenue, 10E1, New York, NY, 10016, USA; Corresponding author. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, Clinical Academic Building, 125 Paterson Street Room 7201, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.Division of Medical Ethics, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USAFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has rapidly grown in notoriety and popularity worldwide as a treatment for both recurrent and refractory C. difficile infection (CDI), as well as for a myriad of other indications, with varying levels of evidence to justify its use. At present, FMT use in the U.S. has not received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but is permitted under “enforcement discretion” for CDI not responding to standard therapy. Meanwhile, the rising interest in the gut microbiome throughout mainstream media has paved the way for “do-it-yourself” (DIY) adaptations of the procedure. This access and unregulated use, often outside any clinical supervision, has quickly outpaced the medical community's research and regulatory efforts. While some studies have been able to demonstrate the success of FMT in treating conditions other than CDI—studies on ulcerative colitis have been particularly promising—little is still known about the treatment's mechanism of action or long-term side effects. Likewise, screening of donor stool is in its early stages in terms of protocol standardization. In this paper, we explore the regulatory and ethical concerns that arise from the need to balance access to a nascent but promising innovative treatment with the need for research into its efficacy, risk profile, and long-term impact.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590097820300240Gastrointestinal microbiomeC. difficileInvestigational drugsExpanded accessBioethicsRegulation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Zoya Grigoryan Michael J. Shen Shaina W. Twardus Marc M. Beuttler Lea Ann Chen Alison Bateman-House |
spellingShingle |
Zoya Grigoryan Michael J. Shen Shaina W. Twardus Marc M. Beuttler Lea Ann Chen Alison Bateman-House Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics Medicine in Microecology Gastrointestinal microbiome C. difficile Investigational drugs Expanded access Bioethics Regulation |
author_facet |
Zoya Grigoryan Michael J. Shen Shaina W. Twardus Marc M. Beuttler Lea Ann Chen Alison Bateman-House |
author_sort |
Zoya Grigoryan |
title |
Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics |
title_short |
Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics |
title_full |
Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics |
title_fullStr |
Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics |
title_sort |
fecal microbiota transplantation: uses, questions, and ethics |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Medicine in Microecology |
issn |
2590-0978 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has rapidly grown in notoriety and popularity worldwide as a treatment for both recurrent and refractory C. difficile infection (CDI), as well as for a myriad of other indications, with varying levels of evidence to justify its use. At present, FMT use in the U.S. has not received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but is permitted under “enforcement discretion” for CDI not responding to standard therapy. Meanwhile, the rising interest in the gut microbiome throughout mainstream media has paved the way for “do-it-yourself” (DIY) adaptations of the procedure. This access and unregulated use, often outside any clinical supervision, has quickly outpaced the medical community's research and regulatory efforts. While some studies have been able to demonstrate the success of FMT in treating conditions other than CDI—studies on ulcerative colitis have been particularly promising—little is still known about the treatment's mechanism of action or long-term side effects. Likewise, screening of donor stool is in its early stages in terms of protocol standardization. In this paper, we explore the regulatory and ethical concerns that arise from the need to balance access to a nascent but promising innovative treatment with the need for research into its efficacy, risk profile, and long-term impact. |
topic |
Gastrointestinal microbiome C. difficile Investigational drugs Expanded access Bioethics Regulation |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590097820300240 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zoyagrigoryan fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics AT michaeljshen fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics AT shainawtwardus fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics AT marcmbeuttler fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics AT leaannchen fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics AT alisonbatemanhouse fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics |
_version_ |
1724364877378617344 |