Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act?
The European Union is currently discussing a reform of its intermediary liability rules with its recently proposed Digital Services Act. The existing rules in the e-Commerce Directive (Directive 2000/31/EC) offer a safe harbour from liability for certain intermediary functions that are central to th...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Oslo Law Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2021/01/liability_exemptions_of_non-hosting_intermediaries_sidesho |
id |
doaj-6310d50649f54bbdaa5cf76eff445715 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6310d50649f54bbdaa5cf76eff4457152021-05-18T21:45:00ZengScandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)Oslo Law Review2387-32992021-01-01842910.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2021-01-0118948693Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act?Sebastian Felix SchwemerTobias MahlerHåkon StyriThe European Union is currently discussing a reform of its intermediary liability rules with its recently proposed Digital Services Act. The existing rules in the e-Commerce Directive (Directive 2000/31/EC) offer a safe harbour from liability for certain intermediary functions that are central to the functioning of the internet. A safe harbour for intermediaries is one of the regulatory cornerstones that help protect innovation, creativity and the free flow of information. At the same time, these rules are under pressure. This paper discusses a subset of ‘non-hosting’ intermediary functions. Some of these have traditionally been less visible in content-related regulatory debates. We look at selected examples of functions related to the domain name system (DNS), content delivery networks (CDNs), cloud processing and live-streaming. The current liability exemption regime under the e-Commerce Directive focusses on transmission in, or access to, a communication network, as well as storage. However, significant grey areas arise both in relation to what we call the ‘auxiliary network intermediary’ function (as opposed to ‘direct network intermediary’ functions corresponding to ‘mere conduit’ functions), which does not transmit or provide access, and the ‘temporal provision and processing of information’, which is different from storage.https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2021/01/liability_exemptions_of_non-hosting_intermediaries_sideshoIntermediary liabilityself-regulationcontent regulationDigital Services Acte-Commerce Directivecontent delivery networks |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sebastian Felix Schwemer Tobias Mahler Håkon Styri |
spellingShingle |
Sebastian Felix Schwemer Tobias Mahler Håkon Styri Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act? Oslo Law Review Intermediary liability self-regulation content regulation Digital Services Act e-Commerce Directive content delivery networks |
author_facet |
Sebastian Felix Schwemer Tobias Mahler Håkon Styri |
author_sort |
Sebastian Felix Schwemer |
title |
Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act? |
title_short |
Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act? |
title_full |
Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act? |
title_fullStr |
Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act? |
title_sort |
liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: sideshow in the digital services act? |
publisher |
Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget) |
series |
Oslo Law Review |
issn |
2387-3299 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
The European Union is currently discussing a reform of its intermediary liability rules with its recently proposed Digital Services Act. The existing rules in the e-Commerce Directive (Directive 2000/31/EC) offer a safe harbour from liability for certain intermediary functions that are central to the functioning of the internet. A safe harbour for intermediaries is one of the regulatory cornerstones that help protect innovation, creativity and the free flow of information. At the same time, these rules are under pressure. This paper discusses a subset of ‘non-hosting’ intermediary functions. Some of these have traditionally been less visible in content-related regulatory debates. We look at selected examples of functions related to the domain name system (DNS), content delivery networks (CDNs), cloud processing and live-streaming. The current liability exemption regime under the e-Commerce Directive focusses on transmission in, or access to, a communication network, as well as storage. However, significant grey areas arise both in relation to what we call the ‘auxiliary network intermediary’ function (as opposed to ‘direct network intermediary’ functions corresponding to ‘mere conduit’ functions), which does not transmit or provide access, and the ‘temporal provision and processing of information’, which is different from storage. |
topic |
Intermediary liability self-regulation content regulation Digital Services Act e-Commerce Directive content delivery networks |
url |
https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2021/01/liability_exemptions_of_non-hosting_intermediaries_sidesho |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sebastianfelixschwemer liabilityexemptionsofnonhostingintermediariessideshowinthedigitalservicesact AT tobiasmahler liabilityexemptionsofnonhostingintermediariessideshowinthedigitalservicesact AT hakonstyri liabilityexemptionsofnonhostingintermediariessideshowinthedigitalservicesact |
_version_ |
1721437173726576640 |