Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act?

The European Union is currently discussing a reform of its intermediary liability rules with its recently proposed Digital Services Act. The existing rules in the e-Commerce Directive (Directive 2000/31/EC) offer a safe harbour from liability for certain intermediary functions that are central to th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Felix Schwemer, Tobias Mahler, Håkon Styri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget) 2021-01-01
Series:Oslo Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2021/01/liability_exemptions_of_non-hosting_intermediaries_sidesho
id doaj-6310d50649f54bbdaa5cf76eff445715
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6310d50649f54bbdaa5cf76eff4457152021-05-18T21:45:00ZengScandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)Oslo Law Review2387-32992021-01-01842910.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2021-01-0118948693Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act?Sebastian Felix SchwemerTobias MahlerHåkon StyriThe European Union is currently discussing a reform of its intermediary liability rules with its recently proposed Digital Services Act. The existing rules in the e-Commerce Directive (Directive 2000/31/EC) offer a safe harbour from liability for certain intermediary functions that are central to the functioning of the internet. A safe harbour for intermediaries is one of the regulatory cornerstones that help protect innovation, creativity and the free flow of information. At the same time, these rules are under pressure. This paper discusses a subset of ‘non-hosting’ intermediary functions. Some of these have traditionally been less visible in content-related regulatory debates. We look at selected examples of functions related to the domain name system (DNS), content delivery networks (CDNs), cloud processing and live-streaming. The current liability exemption regime under the e-Commerce Directive focusses on transmission in, or access to, a communication network, as well as storage. However, significant grey areas arise both in relation to what we call the ‘auxiliary network intermediary’ function (as opposed to ‘direct network intermediary’ functions corresponding to ‘mere conduit’ functions), which does not transmit or provide access, and the ‘temporal provision and processing of information’, which is different from storage.https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2021/01/liability_exemptions_of_non-hosting_intermediaries_sideshoIntermediary liabilityself-regulationcontent regulationDigital Services Acte-Commerce Directivecontent delivery networks
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Felix Schwemer
Tobias Mahler
Håkon Styri
spellingShingle Sebastian Felix Schwemer
Tobias Mahler
Håkon Styri
Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act?
Oslo Law Review
Intermediary liability
self-regulation
content regulation
Digital Services Act
e-Commerce Directive
content delivery networks
author_facet Sebastian Felix Schwemer
Tobias Mahler
Håkon Styri
author_sort Sebastian Felix Schwemer
title Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act?
title_short Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act?
title_full Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act?
title_fullStr Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act?
title_full_unstemmed Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act?
title_sort liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: sideshow in the digital services act?
publisher Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)
series Oslo Law Review
issn 2387-3299
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The European Union is currently discussing a reform of its intermediary liability rules with its recently proposed Digital Services Act. The existing rules in the e-Commerce Directive (Directive 2000/31/EC) offer a safe harbour from liability for certain intermediary functions that are central to the functioning of the internet. A safe harbour for intermediaries is one of the regulatory cornerstones that help protect innovation, creativity and the free flow of information. At the same time, these rules are under pressure. This paper discusses a subset of ‘non-hosting’ intermediary functions. Some of these have traditionally been less visible in content-related regulatory debates. We look at selected examples of functions related to the domain name system (DNS), content delivery networks (CDNs), cloud processing and live-streaming. The current liability exemption regime under the e-Commerce Directive focusses on transmission in, or access to, a communication network, as well as storage. However, significant grey areas arise both in relation to what we call the ‘auxiliary network intermediary’ function (as opposed to ‘direct network intermediary’ functions corresponding to ‘mere conduit’ functions), which does not transmit or provide access, and the ‘temporal provision and processing of information’, which is different from storage.
topic Intermediary liability
self-regulation
content regulation
Digital Services Act
e-Commerce Directive
content delivery networks
url https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2021/01/liability_exemptions_of_non-hosting_intermediaries_sidesho
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianfelixschwemer liabilityexemptionsofnonhostingintermediariessideshowinthedigitalservicesact
AT tobiasmahler liabilityexemptionsofnonhostingintermediariessideshowinthedigitalservicesact
AT hakonstyri liabilityexemptionsofnonhostingintermediariessideshowinthedigitalservicesact
_version_ 1721437173726576640