Sustainable Energy Planning as a co-creative governance challenge. Lessons from the Zero Village Bergen

Sustainable energy transition implies different, but interlinked strategies, technologies and policy interventions, implying a complex array of overlapping systems that are shaped by the intervention of diverse actors. The formal mechanisms of transition to sustainability are ill equipped to address...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: savis Gohari, Stig Larssæther
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aalborg University Press 2019-10-01
Series:International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management
Online Access:https://journals.aau.dk/index.php/sepm/article/view/3353
id doaj-62f45f5692814ed6aa77a689fbffbf9a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62f45f5692814ed6aa77a689fbffbf9a2021-03-18T11:55:35ZengAalborg University PressInternational Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management2246-29292246-29292019-10-012410.5278/ijsepm.33532801Sustainable Energy Planning as a co-creative governance challenge. Lessons from the Zero Village Bergensavis Gohari0Stig LarssætherNTNUSustainable energy transition implies different, but interlinked strategies, technologies and policy interventions, implying a complex array of overlapping systems that are shaped by the intervention of diverse actors. The formal mechanisms of transition to sustainability are ill equipped to address and conform with the political and power dimensions. Furthermore, there is no determined blueprint for sustainability transitions and the existing governance systems hitherto have been inefficient and implicated in unsustainability. This paper argues that energy transition requires conceptualization of co-creative governance, and the dynamic interplays between power relations in the face of conflict of interests. Thereby, this paper goes beyond the traditional division of governance network between private, public and academia to investigate the political structure underpinning the functionality of governance. To assess how sustainable energy transitions can be materialized, the aim is to understand how different multilevel governance systems deal with the competing interests, asymmetrical power and mobilization of resources for goal achievement in the case of Zero Village Bergen. It describes how the latent conflict between different involved actors’ interests has led to prolongation, recurring controversies, stagnation, and moments of adaptation. The purpose is to shed light on political and institutional challenges that are common to other sustainable transition initiatives. The method used is semi-structured interviews with private and public actors. The contribution is to theory building in sustainable energy planning from a governance lens.https://journals.aau.dk/index.php/sepm/article/view/3353
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author savis Gohari
Stig Larssæther
spellingShingle savis Gohari
Stig Larssæther
Sustainable Energy Planning as a co-creative governance challenge. Lessons from the Zero Village Bergen
International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management
author_facet savis Gohari
Stig Larssæther
author_sort savis Gohari
title Sustainable Energy Planning as a co-creative governance challenge. Lessons from the Zero Village Bergen
title_short Sustainable Energy Planning as a co-creative governance challenge. Lessons from the Zero Village Bergen
title_full Sustainable Energy Planning as a co-creative governance challenge. Lessons from the Zero Village Bergen
title_fullStr Sustainable Energy Planning as a co-creative governance challenge. Lessons from the Zero Village Bergen
title_full_unstemmed Sustainable Energy Planning as a co-creative governance challenge. Lessons from the Zero Village Bergen
title_sort sustainable energy planning as a co-creative governance challenge. lessons from the zero village bergen
publisher Aalborg University Press
series International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management
issn 2246-2929
2246-2929
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Sustainable energy transition implies different, but interlinked strategies, technologies and policy interventions, implying a complex array of overlapping systems that are shaped by the intervention of diverse actors. The formal mechanisms of transition to sustainability are ill equipped to address and conform with the political and power dimensions. Furthermore, there is no determined blueprint for sustainability transitions and the existing governance systems hitherto have been inefficient and implicated in unsustainability. This paper argues that energy transition requires conceptualization of co-creative governance, and the dynamic interplays between power relations in the face of conflict of interests. Thereby, this paper goes beyond the traditional division of governance network between private, public and academia to investigate the political structure underpinning the functionality of governance. To assess how sustainable energy transitions can be materialized, the aim is to understand how different multilevel governance systems deal with the competing interests, asymmetrical power and mobilization of resources for goal achievement in the case of Zero Village Bergen. It describes how the latent conflict between different involved actors’ interests has led to prolongation, recurring controversies, stagnation, and moments of adaptation. The purpose is to shed light on political and institutional challenges that are common to other sustainable transition initiatives. The method used is semi-structured interviews with private and public actors. The contribution is to theory building in sustainable energy planning from a governance lens.
url https://journals.aau.dk/index.php/sepm/article/view/3353
work_keys_str_mv AT savisgohari sustainableenergyplanningasacocreativegovernancechallengelessonsfromthezerovillagebergen
AT stiglarssæther sustainableenergyplanningasacocreativegovernancechallengelessonsfromthezerovillagebergen
_version_ 1714779916928548864