No Place Called Home. The Banishment of ‘Foreign Criminals’ in the Public Interest: A Wrong without Redress

This article examines the legal and ethical rationale for the deportation of ‘foreign criminals’ who have established their homes in the United Kingdom. It argues that provisions relating to automatic deportation constitute a second punishment that can be more accurately described as banishment. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Helen O’Nions
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Laws
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/9/4/26
id doaj-62ebf5664b5d4f9bb7d4e6856fa8312a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62ebf5664b5d4f9bb7d4e6856fa8312a2020-11-25T04:07:29ZengMDPI AGLaws2075-471X2020-11-019262610.3390/laws9040026No Place Called Home. The Banishment of ‘Foreign Criminals’ in the Public Interest: A Wrong without RedressHelen O’Nions0Nottingham Law School, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4BU, UKThis article examines the legal and ethical rationale for the deportation of ‘foreign criminals’ who have established their homes in the United Kingdom. It argues that provisions relating to automatic deportation constitute a second punishment that can be more accurately described as banishment. The human rights of those defined as ‘foreign criminals’ have been reduced to privileges that are easily withdrawn with reference to the ill-defined public interest. The ability to challenge deportation is then compromised by a non-suspensive appeal process that deliberately undermines the right to an effective remedy whilst further damaging private and family life. With reference to social membership and domicile theories of belonging, it is suggested that those who have made their lives in the UK and established their place and domicile here should be regarded as unconditional members of civil society. As such, they are entitled to equality of treatment in the criminal justice system and should be immune from punitive ‘crimmigration’ measures.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/9/4/26deportationcitizenshipforeign criminalsfamily lifehuman rightsappeals
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Helen O’Nions
spellingShingle Helen O’Nions
No Place Called Home. The Banishment of ‘Foreign Criminals’ in the Public Interest: A Wrong without Redress
Laws
deportation
citizenship
foreign criminals
family life
human rights
appeals
author_facet Helen O’Nions
author_sort Helen O’Nions
title No Place Called Home. The Banishment of ‘Foreign Criminals’ in the Public Interest: A Wrong without Redress
title_short No Place Called Home. The Banishment of ‘Foreign Criminals’ in the Public Interest: A Wrong without Redress
title_full No Place Called Home. The Banishment of ‘Foreign Criminals’ in the Public Interest: A Wrong without Redress
title_fullStr No Place Called Home. The Banishment of ‘Foreign Criminals’ in the Public Interest: A Wrong without Redress
title_full_unstemmed No Place Called Home. The Banishment of ‘Foreign Criminals’ in the Public Interest: A Wrong without Redress
title_sort no place called home. the banishment of ‘foreign criminals’ in the public interest: a wrong without redress
publisher MDPI AG
series Laws
issn 2075-471X
publishDate 2020-11-01
description This article examines the legal and ethical rationale for the deportation of ‘foreign criminals’ who have established their homes in the United Kingdom. It argues that provisions relating to automatic deportation constitute a second punishment that can be more accurately described as banishment. The human rights of those defined as ‘foreign criminals’ have been reduced to privileges that are easily withdrawn with reference to the ill-defined public interest. The ability to challenge deportation is then compromised by a non-suspensive appeal process that deliberately undermines the right to an effective remedy whilst further damaging private and family life. With reference to social membership and domicile theories of belonging, it is suggested that those who have made their lives in the UK and established their place and domicile here should be regarded as unconditional members of civil society. As such, they are entitled to equality of treatment in the criminal justice system and should be immune from punitive ‘crimmigration’ measures.
topic deportation
citizenship
foreign criminals
family life
human rights
appeals
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/9/4/26
work_keys_str_mv AT helenonions noplacecalledhomethebanishmentofforeigncriminalsinthepublicinterestawrongwithoutredress
_version_ 1724428700871557120