La dictadura cívico-militar uruguaya (1973-1985): la construcción de la noción de víctima y la figura del exiliado en el Uruguay post-dictatorial

The Uruguayan dictatorship (1973-1985) forced nearly 380,000 people, almost 14% of the population, into exile. Exile began as something temporary in neighboring countries in order to continue the militancy against the regime. To be a militant presupposes that militancy does not make one become a vic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Magdalena Schelotto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains 2015-03-01
Series:Nuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/67888
id doaj-62d46dbe267940c09e2e35eb78891b36
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62d46dbe267940c09e2e35eb78891b362021-10-05T12:56:28ZengCentre de Recherches sur les Mondes AméricainsNuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos1626-02522015-03-0110.4000/nuevomundo.67888La dictadura cívico-militar uruguaya (1973-1985): la construcción de la noción de víctima y la figura del exiliado en el Uruguay post-dictatorialMagdalena SchelottoThe Uruguayan dictatorship (1973-1985) forced nearly 380,000 people, almost 14% of the population, into exile. Exile began as something temporary in neighboring countries in order to continue the militancy against the regime. To be a militant presupposes that militancy does not make one become a victim. Torture, imprisonment or death was just a consequence of that struggle. During the toughest years of the dictatorial repression, exile stopped being temporary and became something more long lasting and in further away countries. Soon, the various militant organizations abroad realized that in order to denounce the Uruguayan situation in the face of international organizations they must modify their discourse. This was done by adopting the transnational language of Human Rights. Their discourse moved away from militant language and on to talking about victims and to stop treating the human consequences of repression as something normal.In a country where victims associations were not created until almost the end of the conflict, the diaspora discourse will resonate in the first claims by the Uruguayan society for the restoration of democracy. Through a reconstruction of the evolution of the discourse of different groups, we get closer to the way the in which the Uruguayan society constructs the concept of victim and what are its consequences under a state policy of silence.http://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/67888UruguaydictatorshipexileHuman Rightsvictim
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Magdalena Schelotto
spellingShingle Magdalena Schelotto
La dictadura cívico-militar uruguaya (1973-1985): la construcción de la noción de víctima y la figura del exiliado en el Uruguay post-dictatorial
Nuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos
Uruguay
dictatorship
exile
Human Rights
victim
author_facet Magdalena Schelotto
author_sort Magdalena Schelotto
title La dictadura cívico-militar uruguaya (1973-1985): la construcción de la noción de víctima y la figura del exiliado en el Uruguay post-dictatorial
title_short La dictadura cívico-militar uruguaya (1973-1985): la construcción de la noción de víctima y la figura del exiliado en el Uruguay post-dictatorial
title_full La dictadura cívico-militar uruguaya (1973-1985): la construcción de la noción de víctima y la figura del exiliado en el Uruguay post-dictatorial
title_fullStr La dictadura cívico-militar uruguaya (1973-1985): la construcción de la noción de víctima y la figura del exiliado en el Uruguay post-dictatorial
title_full_unstemmed La dictadura cívico-militar uruguaya (1973-1985): la construcción de la noción de víctima y la figura del exiliado en el Uruguay post-dictatorial
title_sort la dictadura cívico-militar uruguaya (1973-1985): la construcción de la noción de víctima y la figura del exiliado en el uruguay post-dictatorial
publisher Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains
series Nuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos
issn 1626-0252
publishDate 2015-03-01
description The Uruguayan dictatorship (1973-1985) forced nearly 380,000 people, almost 14% of the population, into exile. Exile began as something temporary in neighboring countries in order to continue the militancy against the regime. To be a militant presupposes that militancy does not make one become a victim. Torture, imprisonment or death was just a consequence of that struggle. During the toughest years of the dictatorial repression, exile stopped being temporary and became something more long lasting and in further away countries. Soon, the various militant organizations abroad realized that in order to denounce the Uruguayan situation in the face of international organizations they must modify their discourse. This was done by adopting the transnational language of Human Rights. Their discourse moved away from militant language and on to talking about victims and to stop treating the human consequences of repression as something normal.In a country where victims associations were not created until almost the end of the conflict, the diaspora discourse will resonate in the first claims by the Uruguayan society for the restoration of democracy. Through a reconstruction of the evolution of the discourse of different groups, we get closer to the way the in which the Uruguayan society constructs the concept of victim and what are its consequences under a state policy of silence.
topic Uruguay
dictatorship
exile
Human Rights
victim
url http://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/67888
work_keys_str_mv AT magdalenaschelotto ladictaduracivicomilitaruruguaya19731985laconstrucciondelanociondevictimaylafiguradelexiliadoeneluruguaypostdictatorial
_version_ 1716842438205636608