The annoying creak of the hermeneutic circle – comments on Andrzej Szahaj’s article
<span>This essay is merely an additional commentary on the article entitled “Hirsch o interpretacji. Analiza krytyczna” (“Hirsch on interpretation. A critical analysis”). I do not focus here on Szahaj’s detailed objections to the concepts proposed by the author of Validity in Interpretation. I...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Polish |
Published: |
Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Przestrzenie Teorii |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pt/article/view/3387 |
id |
doaj-62d2f11f8e7e44758adfecf42fff23ea |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-62d2f11f8e7e44758adfecf42fff23ea2020-11-25T00:25:01ZpolWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w PoznaniuPrzestrzenie Teorii1644-67632450-57652013-01-012020721710.14746/pt.2013.20.143358The annoying creak of the hermeneutic circle – comments on Andrzej Szahaj’s articleDanuta Szajnert<span>This essay is merely an additional commentary on the article entitled “Hirsch o interpretacji. Analiza krytyczna” (“Hirsch on interpretation. A critical analysis”). I do not focus here on Szahaj’s detailed objections to the concepts proposed by the author of Validity in Interpretation. I concentrate instead on the idea that forms the basis for such objections, i.e. radical, cultural interpretative constructivism. As a skeptical intentionalist, I cannot fully share his opinion and, therefore, I draw attention to views according to which the constructivist paradigm is becoming conventionalized and exhausted (especially in the humanities) and to the possible ways in which it can be overcome.</span>http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pt/article/view/3387Interpretacjakonstruktywizmintencja autora |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Polish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Danuta Szajnert |
spellingShingle |
Danuta Szajnert The annoying creak of the hermeneutic circle – comments on Andrzej Szahaj’s article Przestrzenie Teorii Interpretacja konstruktywizm intencja autora |
author_facet |
Danuta Szajnert |
author_sort |
Danuta Szajnert |
title |
The annoying creak of the hermeneutic circle – comments on Andrzej Szahaj’s article |
title_short |
The annoying creak of the hermeneutic circle – comments on Andrzej Szahaj’s article |
title_full |
The annoying creak of the hermeneutic circle – comments on Andrzej Szahaj’s article |
title_fullStr |
The annoying creak of the hermeneutic circle – comments on Andrzej Szahaj’s article |
title_full_unstemmed |
The annoying creak of the hermeneutic circle – comments on Andrzej Szahaj’s article |
title_sort |
annoying creak of the hermeneutic circle – comments on andrzej szahaj’s article |
publisher |
Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu |
series |
Przestrzenie Teorii |
issn |
1644-6763 2450-5765 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
<span>This essay is merely an additional commentary on the article entitled “Hirsch o interpretacji. Analiza krytyczna” (“Hirsch on interpretation. A critical analysis”). I do not focus here on Szahaj’s detailed objections to the concepts proposed by the author of Validity in Interpretation. I concentrate instead on the idea that forms the basis for such objections, i.e. radical, cultural interpretative constructivism. As a skeptical intentionalist, I cannot fully share his opinion and, therefore, I draw attention to views according to which the constructivist paradigm is becoming conventionalized and exhausted (especially in the humanities) and to the possible ways in which it can be overcome.</span> |
topic |
Interpretacja konstruktywizm intencja autora |
url |
http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pt/article/view/3387 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danutaszajnert theannoyingcreakofthehermeneuticcirclecommentsonandrzejszahajsarticle AT danutaszajnert annoyingcreakofthehermeneuticcirclecommentsonandrzejszahajsarticle |
_version_ |
1725350308660379648 |