The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema
Background: The emphysema interventional treatment involves mainly lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and endobronchial valve (EBV) implantation. Few institutes discuss these cases at a dedicated emphysema multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting. Objectives: To investigate the impact of a newly estab...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1179548419852063 |
id |
doaj-62cb8d87619046e69371349388d93f40 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-62cb8d87619046e69371349388d93f402020-11-25T03:45:23ZengSAGE PublishingClinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine1179-54842019-06-011310.1177/1179548419852063The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With EmphysemaVasileios Kouritas0Richard Milton1Emmanouel Kefaloyannis2Kostas Papagiannopoulos3Allesandro Brunelli4Doytchin Dimov5Sishik Karthik6Andrew Hardy7Peter Tcherveniakov8Nilanjan Chaudhuri9Department of Thoracic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKDepartment of Radiology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Hospital, Halifax, UKDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKBackground: The emphysema interventional treatment involves mainly lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and endobronchial valve (EBV) implantation. Few institutes discuss these cases at a dedicated emphysema multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting. Objectives: To investigate the impact of a newly established dedicated emphysema MDT meeting on the interventional treatment of such patients. Methods: During a study period of 4 years, the outcome of 44 patients who underwent intervention according to the proposal of the emphysema MDT (group A) was compared with the outcome of 44 propensity score matched patients (group B) treated without the emphysema MDT proposal. Results: More LVRS and less EBV insertions were performed in group A ( P = .009). In group B, the interventions were performed sooner than in group A ( P = .003). Postoperative overall morbidity and length of in-hospital stay were similar in the 2 groups ( P = .918 and .758, respectively). Improvement of breathing ability was reported in more patients from group A ( P = .012). In group B, the total number of re-interventions was higher ( P = .001) and the time to re-intervention had the tendency to be less ( P = .069). Survival was similar between the 2 groups ( P = .884). Intervention without discussion at the MDT and EBV as initial intervention was an independent predictor of re-intervention. Conclusions: Interventional treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) after discussion at a dedicated MDT involved more LVRS performed, required fewer interventions for their disease, and had longer re-intervention-free intervals and better breathing improvement.https://doi.org/10.1177/1179548419852063 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Vasileios Kouritas Richard Milton Emmanouel Kefaloyannis Kostas Papagiannopoulos Allesandro Brunelli Doytchin Dimov Sishik Karthik Andrew Hardy Peter Tcherveniakov Nilanjan Chaudhuri |
spellingShingle |
Vasileios Kouritas Richard Milton Emmanouel Kefaloyannis Kostas Papagiannopoulos Allesandro Brunelli Doytchin Dimov Sishik Karthik Andrew Hardy Peter Tcherveniakov Nilanjan Chaudhuri The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine |
author_facet |
Vasileios Kouritas Richard Milton Emmanouel Kefaloyannis Kostas Papagiannopoulos Allesandro Brunelli Doytchin Dimov Sishik Karthik Andrew Hardy Peter Tcherveniakov Nilanjan Chaudhuri |
author_sort |
Vasileios Kouritas |
title |
The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema |
title_short |
The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema |
title_full |
The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema |
title_fullStr |
The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema |
title_sort |
impact of a newly established multidisciplinary team on the interventional treatment of patients with emphysema |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine |
issn |
1179-5484 |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
Background: The emphysema interventional treatment involves mainly lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and endobronchial valve (EBV) implantation. Few institutes discuss these cases at a dedicated emphysema multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting. Objectives: To investigate the impact of a newly established dedicated emphysema MDT meeting on the interventional treatment of such patients. Methods: During a study period of 4 years, the outcome of 44 patients who underwent intervention according to the proposal of the emphysema MDT (group A) was compared with the outcome of 44 propensity score matched patients (group B) treated without the emphysema MDT proposal. Results: More LVRS and less EBV insertions were performed in group A ( P = .009). In group B, the interventions were performed sooner than in group A ( P = .003). Postoperative overall morbidity and length of in-hospital stay were similar in the 2 groups ( P = .918 and .758, respectively). Improvement of breathing ability was reported in more patients from group A ( P = .012). In group B, the total number of re-interventions was higher ( P = .001) and the time to re-intervention had the tendency to be less ( P = .069). Survival was similar between the 2 groups ( P = .884). Intervention without discussion at the MDT and EBV as initial intervention was an independent predictor of re-intervention. Conclusions: Interventional treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) after discussion at a dedicated MDT involved more LVRS performed, required fewer interventions for their disease, and had longer re-intervention-free intervals and better breathing improvement. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1179548419852063 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vasileioskouritas theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT richardmilton theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT emmanouelkefaloyannis theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT kostaspapagiannopoulos theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT allesandrobrunelli theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT doytchindimov theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT sishikkarthik theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT andrewhardy theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT petertcherveniakov theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT nilanjanchaudhuri theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT vasileioskouritas impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT richardmilton impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT emmanouelkefaloyannis impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT kostaspapagiannopoulos impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT allesandrobrunelli impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT doytchindimov impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT sishikkarthik impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT andrewhardy impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT petertcherveniakov impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema AT nilanjanchaudhuri impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema |
_version_ |
1724509617067655168 |