The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema

Background: The emphysema interventional treatment involves mainly lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and endobronchial valve (EBV) implantation. Few institutes discuss these cases at a dedicated emphysema multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting. Objectives: To investigate the impact of a newly estab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vasileios Kouritas, Richard Milton, Emmanouel Kefaloyannis, Kostas Papagiannopoulos, Allesandro Brunelli, Doytchin Dimov, Sishik Karthik, Andrew Hardy, Peter Tcherveniakov, Nilanjan Chaudhuri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-06-01
Series:Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1179548419852063
id doaj-62cb8d87619046e69371349388d93f40
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62cb8d87619046e69371349388d93f402020-11-25T03:45:23ZengSAGE PublishingClinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine1179-54842019-06-011310.1177/1179548419852063The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With EmphysemaVasileios Kouritas0Richard Milton1Emmanouel Kefaloyannis2Kostas Papagiannopoulos3Allesandro Brunelli4Doytchin Dimov5Sishik Karthik6Andrew Hardy7Peter Tcherveniakov8Nilanjan Chaudhuri9Department of Thoracic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKDepartment of Radiology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Hospital, Halifax, UKDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UKBackground: The emphysema interventional treatment involves mainly lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and endobronchial valve (EBV) implantation. Few institutes discuss these cases at a dedicated emphysema multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting. Objectives: To investigate the impact of a newly established dedicated emphysema MDT meeting on the interventional treatment of such patients. Methods: During a study period of 4 years, the outcome of 44 patients who underwent intervention according to the proposal of the emphysema MDT (group A) was compared with the outcome of 44 propensity score matched patients (group B) treated without the emphysema MDT proposal. Results: More LVRS and less EBV insertions were performed in group A ( P  =   .009). In group B, the interventions were performed sooner than in group A ( P  =   .003). Postoperative overall morbidity and length of in-hospital stay were similar in the 2 groups ( P  =   .918 and .758, respectively). Improvement of breathing ability was reported in more patients from group A ( P  =   .012). In group B, the total number of re-interventions was higher ( P  =   .001) and the time to re-intervention had the tendency to be less ( P  =   .069). Survival was similar between the 2 groups ( P  =   .884). Intervention without discussion at the MDT and EBV as initial intervention was an independent predictor of re-intervention. Conclusions: Interventional treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) after discussion at a dedicated MDT involved more LVRS performed, required fewer interventions for their disease, and had longer re-intervention-free intervals and better breathing improvement.https://doi.org/10.1177/1179548419852063
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vasileios Kouritas
Richard Milton
Emmanouel Kefaloyannis
Kostas Papagiannopoulos
Allesandro Brunelli
Doytchin Dimov
Sishik Karthik
Andrew Hardy
Peter Tcherveniakov
Nilanjan Chaudhuri
spellingShingle Vasileios Kouritas
Richard Milton
Emmanouel Kefaloyannis
Kostas Papagiannopoulos
Allesandro Brunelli
Doytchin Dimov
Sishik Karthik
Andrew Hardy
Peter Tcherveniakov
Nilanjan Chaudhuri
The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema
Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine
author_facet Vasileios Kouritas
Richard Milton
Emmanouel Kefaloyannis
Kostas Papagiannopoulos
Allesandro Brunelli
Doytchin Dimov
Sishik Karthik
Andrew Hardy
Peter Tcherveniakov
Nilanjan Chaudhuri
author_sort Vasileios Kouritas
title The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema
title_short The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema
title_full The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema
title_fullStr The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema
title_sort impact of a newly established multidisciplinary team on the interventional treatment of patients with emphysema
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine
issn 1179-5484
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Background: The emphysema interventional treatment involves mainly lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and endobronchial valve (EBV) implantation. Few institutes discuss these cases at a dedicated emphysema multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting. Objectives: To investigate the impact of a newly established dedicated emphysema MDT meeting on the interventional treatment of such patients. Methods: During a study period of 4 years, the outcome of 44 patients who underwent intervention according to the proposal of the emphysema MDT (group A) was compared with the outcome of 44 propensity score matched patients (group B) treated without the emphysema MDT proposal. Results: More LVRS and less EBV insertions were performed in group A ( P  =   .009). In group B, the interventions were performed sooner than in group A ( P  =   .003). Postoperative overall morbidity and length of in-hospital stay were similar in the 2 groups ( P  =   .918 and .758, respectively). Improvement of breathing ability was reported in more patients from group A ( P  =   .012). In group B, the total number of re-interventions was higher ( P  =   .001) and the time to re-intervention had the tendency to be less ( P  =   .069). Survival was similar between the 2 groups ( P  =   .884). Intervention without discussion at the MDT and EBV as initial intervention was an independent predictor of re-intervention. Conclusions: Interventional treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) after discussion at a dedicated MDT involved more LVRS performed, required fewer interventions for their disease, and had longer re-intervention-free intervals and better breathing improvement.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1179548419852063
work_keys_str_mv AT vasileioskouritas theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT richardmilton theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT emmanouelkefaloyannis theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT kostaspapagiannopoulos theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT allesandrobrunelli theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT doytchindimov theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT sishikkarthik theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT andrewhardy theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT petertcherveniakov theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT nilanjanchaudhuri theimpactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT vasileioskouritas impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT richardmilton impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT emmanouelkefaloyannis impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT kostaspapagiannopoulos impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT allesandrobrunelli impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT doytchindimov impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT sishikkarthik impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT andrewhardy impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT petertcherveniakov impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
AT nilanjanchaudhuri impactofanewlyestablishedmultidisciplinaryteamontheinterventionaltreatmentofpatientswithemphysema
_version_ 1724509617067655168