The safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot study
Abstract Background Studies evaluating nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to prevent nicotine withdrawal symptoms in ICU patients have yielded conflicting results. We performed a randomised controlled double-blind pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of NRT in critically ill patients. Mecha...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Annals of Intensive Care |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13613-018-0399-1 |
id |
doaj-62bbfb2dbdb74a2980d03fc2c1658309 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-62bbfb2dbdb74a2980d03fc2c16583092020-11-24T21:05:16ZengSpringerOpenAnnals of Intensive Care2110-58202018-06-01811910.1186/s13613-018-0399-1The safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot studyBen de Jong0Anne Sophie Schuppers1Arriette Kruisdijk-Gerritsen2Maurits Erwin Leo Arbouw3Hubertus Laurentius Antonius van den Oever4Arthur R. H. van Zanten5Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei HospitalDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Deventer HospitalDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Deventer HospitalDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Deventer HospitalDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Deventer HospitalDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei HospitalAbstract Background Studies evaluating nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to prevent nicotine withdrawal symptoms in ICU patients have yielded conflicting results. We performed a randomised controlled double-blind pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of NRT in critically ill patients. Mechanically ventilated patients admitted to two medical–surgical intensive care units and smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day before ICU admission were enrolled in this study. Participants were randomised to transdermal NRT (14 or 21 mg per day) or placebo until ICU discharge or day 30. Smoking status was confirmed by the biomarkers serum cotinine and urinary NNAL. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Among secondary endpoints and post hoc endpoints, 90-day mortality, safety, time spent without delirium, sedation and coma, and patient destination at day 30 were addressed. Results We enrolled 47 patients. No differences were found between NRT and control group patients concerning 30-day mortality (9.5 vs. 7.7%, p = 0.84) and 90-day mortality (14.3 vs. 19.2%, p = 0.67). The number of serious adverse events was comparable between groups (NRT: 4, control: 11, p = 0.13). At day 20, average time alive without delirium, sedation and coma was 16.6 days among NRT patients versus 12.6 days among control patients (p = 0.03). At day 30, more NRT group patients were discharged from the ICU or hospital compared with controls (p = 0.03). Conclusions NRT did not affect mortality or the number of (serious) adverse events compared with placebo. Time alive without delirium, sedation and coma at day 20 in NRT patients was longer than in control patients. An adequately powered randomised controlled trial to further study safety and efficacy of NRT in ICU patients seems feasible and is warranted. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01362959, registered 1 June 2011http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13613-018-0399-1SmokingNNALCotinineDeliriumAgitationWithdrawal |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ben de Jong Anne Sophie Schuppers Arriette Kruisdijk-Gerritsen Maurits Erwin Leo Arbouw Hubertus Laurentius Antonius van den Oever Arthur R. H. van Zanten |
spellingShingle |
Ben de Jong Anne Sophie Schuppers Arriette Kruisdijk-Gerritsen Maurits Erwin Leo Arbouw Hubertus Laurentius Antonius van den Oever Arthur R. H. van Zanten The safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot study Annals of Intensive Care Smoking NNAL Cotinine Delirium Agitation Withdrawal |
author_facet |
Ben de Jong Anne Sophie Schuppers Arriette Kruisdijk-Gerritsen Maurits Erwin Leo Arbouw Hubertus Laurentius Antonius van den Oever Arthur R. H. van Zanten |
author_sort |
Ben de Jong |
title |
The safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot study |
title_short |
The safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot study |
title_full |
The safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot study |
title_fullStr |
The safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed |
The safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot study |
title_sort |
safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot study |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Annals of Intensive Care |
issn |
2110-5820 |
publishDate |
2018-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Studies evaluating nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to prevent nicotine withdrawal symptoms in ICU patients have yielded conflicting results. We performed a randomised controlled double-blind pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of NRT in critically ill patients. Mechanically ventilated patients admitted to two medical–surgical intensive care units and smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day before ICU admission were enrolled in this study. Participants were randomised to transdermal NRT (14 or 21 mg per day) or placebo until ICU discharge or day 30. Smoking status was confirmed by the biomarkers serum cotinine and urinary NNAL. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Among secondary endpoints and post hoc endpoints, 90-day mortality, safety, time spent without delirium, sedation and coma, and patient destination at day 30 were addressed. Results We enrolled 47 patients. No differences were found between NRT and control group patients concerning 30-day mortality (9.5 vs. 7.7%, p = 0.84) and 90-day mortality (14.3 vs. 19.2%, p = 0.67). The number of serious adverse events was comparable between groups (NRT: 4, control: 11, p = 0.13). At day 20, average time alive without delirium, sedation and coma was 16.6 days among NRT patients versus 12.6 days among control patients (p = 0.03). At day 30, more NRT group patients were discharged from the ICU or hospital compared with controls (p = 0.03). Conclusions NRT did not affect mortality or the number of (serious) adverse events compared with placebo. Time alive without delirium, sedation and coma at day 20 in NRT patients was longer than in control patients. An adequately powered randomised controlled trial to further study safety and efficacy of NRT in ICU patients seems feasible and is warranted. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01362959, registered 1 June 2011 |
topic |
Smoking NNAL Cotinine Delirium Agitation Withdrawal |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13613-018-0399-1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bendejong thesafetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT annesophieschuppers thesafetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT arriettekruisdijkgerritsen thesafetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT mauritserwinleoarbouw thesafetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT hubertuslaurentiusantoniusvandenoever thesafetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT arthurrhvanzanten thesafetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT bendejong safetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT annesophieschuppers safetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT arriettekruisdijkgerritsen safetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT mauritserwinleoarbouw safetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT hubertuslaurentiusantoniusvandenoever safetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT arthurrhvanzanten safetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy |
_version_ |
1716769361099751424 |