The safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot study

Abstract Background Studies evaluating nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to prevent nicotine withdrawal symptoms in ICU patients have yielded conflicting results. We performed a randomised controlled double-blind pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of NRT in critically ill patients. Mecha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ben de Jong, Anne Sophie Schuppers, Arriette Kruisdijk-Gerritsen, Maurits Erwin Leo Arbouw, Hubertus Laurentius Antonius van den Oever, Arthur R. H. van Zanten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-06-01
Series:Annals of Intensive Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13613-018-0399-1
id doaj-62bbfb2dbdb74a2980d03fc2c1658309
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62bbfb2dbdb74a2980d03fc2c16583092020-11-24T21:05:16ZengSpringerOpenAnnals of Intensive Care2110-58202018-06-01811910.1186/s13613-018-0399-1The safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot studyBen de Jong0Anne Sophie Schuppers1Arriette Kruisdijk-Gerritsen2Maurits Erwin Leo Arbouw3Hubertus Laurentius Antonius van den Oever4Arthur R. H. van Zanten5Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei HospitalDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Deventer HospitalDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Deventer HospitalDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Deventer HospitalDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Deventer HospitalDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei HospitalAbstract Background Studies evaluating nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to prevent nicotine withdrawal symptoms in ICU patients have yielded conflicting results. We performed a randomised controlled double-blind pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of NRT in critically ill patients. Mechanically ventilated patients admitted to two medical–surgical intensive care units and smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day before ICU admission were enrolled in this study. Participants were randomised to transdermal NRT (14 or 21 mg per day) or placebo until ICU discharge or day 30. Smoking status was confirmed by the biomarkers serum cotinine and urinary NNAL. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Among secondary endpoints and post hoc endpoints, 90-day mortality, safety, time spent without delirium, sedation and coma, and patient destination at day 30 were addressed. Results We enrolled 47 patients. No differences were found between NRT and control group patients concerning 30-day mortality (9.5 vs. 7.7%, p = 0.84) and 90-day mortality (14.3 vs. 19.2%, p = 0.67). The number of serious adverse events was comparable between groups (NRT: 4, control: 11, p = 0.13). At day 20, average time alive without delirium, sedation and coma was 16.6 days among NRT patients versus 12.6 days among control patients (p = 0.03). At day 30, more NRT group patients were discharged from the ICU or hospital compared with controls (p = 0.03). Conclusions NRT did not affect mortality or the number of (serious) adverse events compared with placebo. Time alive without delirium, sedation and coma at day 20 in NRT patients was longer than in control patients. An adequately powered randomised controlled trial to further study safety and efficacy of NRT in ICU patients seems feasible and is warranted. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01362959, registered 1 June 2011http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13613-018-0399-1SmokingNNALCotinineDeliriumAgitationWithdrawal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ben de Jong
Anne Sophie Schuppers
Arriette Kruisdijk-Gerritsen
Maurits Erwin Leo Arbouw
Hubertus Laurentius Antonius van den Oever
Arthur R. H. van Zanten
spellingShingle Ben de Jong
Anne Sophie Schuppers
Arriette Kruisdijk-Gerritsen
Maurits Erwin Leo Arbouw
Hubertus Laurentius Antonius van den Oever
Arthur R. H. van Zanten
The safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot study
Annals of Intensive Care
Smoking
NNAL
Cotinine
Delirium
Agitation
Withdrawal
author_facet Ben de Jong
Anne Sophie Schuppers
Arriette Kruisdijk-Gerritsen
Maurits Erwin Leo Arbouw
Hubertus Laurentius Antonius van den Oever
Arthur R. H. van Zanten
author_sort Ben de Jong
title The safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot study
title_short The safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot study
title_full The safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot study
title_fullStr The safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot study
title_full_unstemmed The safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot study
title_sort safety and efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: a randomised controlled pilot study
publisher SpringerOpen
series Annals of Intensive Care
issn 2110-5820
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Abstract Background Studies evaluating nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to prevent nicotine withdrawal symptoms in ICU patients have yielded conflicting results. We performed a randomised controlled double-blind pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of NRT in critically ill patients. Mechanically ventilated patients admitted to two medical–surgical intensive care units and smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day before ICU admission were enrolled in this study. Participants were randomised to transdermal NRT (14 or 21 mg per day) or placebo until ICU discharge or day 30. Smoking status was confirmed by the biomarkers serum cotinine and urinary NNAL. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Among secondary endpoints and post hoc endpoints, 90-day mortality, safety, time spent without delirium, sedation and coma, and patient destination at day 30 were addressed. Results We enrolled 47 patients. No differences were found between NRT and control group patients concerning 30-day mortality (9.5 vs. 7.7%, p = 0.84) and 90-day mortality (14.3 vs. 19.2%, p = 0.67). The number of serious adverse events was comparable between groups (NRT: 4, control: 11, p = 0.13). At day 20, average time alive without delirium, sedation and coma was 16.6 days among NRT patients versus 12.6 days among control patients (p = 0.03). At day 30, more NRT group patients were discharged from the ICU or hospital compared with controls (p = 0.03). Conclusions NRT did not affect mortality or the number of (serious) adverse events compared with placebo. Time alive without delirium, sedation and coma at day 20 in NRT patients was longer than in control patients. An adequately powered randomised controlled trial to further study safety and efficacy of NRT in ICU patients seems feasible and is warranted. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01362959, registered 1 June 2011
topic Smoking
NNAL
Cotinine
Delirium
Agitation
Withdrawal
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13613-018-0399-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bendejong thesafetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT annesophieschuppers thesafetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT arriettekruisdijkgerritsen thesafetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT mauritserwinleoarbouw thesafetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT hubertuslaurentiusantoniusvandenoever thesafetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT arthurrhvanzanten thesafetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT bendejong safetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT annesophieschuppers safetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT arriettekruisdijkgerritsen safetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT mauritserwinleoarbouw safetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT hubertuslaurentiusantoniusvandenoever safetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT arthurrhvanzanten safetyandefficacyofnicotinereplacementtherapyintheintensivecareunitarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy
_version_ 1716769361099751424