Evaluating spatiotemporal integration of shape cues.

Prior work has shown that humans can successfully identify letters that are constructed with a sparse array of dots, wherein the dot pattern reflects the strokes that would normally be used to fashion a given letter. In the present work the dots were briefly displayed, one at a time in sequence, var...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taylor Burchfield, Ernest Greene
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224530
id doaj-62b5b7ca410440e59f2c9f58c60984e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62b5b7ca410440e59f2c9f58c60984e12021-03-03T21:55:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01155e022453010.1371/journal.pone.0224530Evaluating spatiotemporal integration of shape cues.Taylor BurchfieldErnest GreenePrior work has shown that humans can successfully identify letters that are constructed with a sparse array of dots, wherein the dot pattern reflects the strokes that would normally be used to fashion a given letter. In the present work the dots were briefly displayed, one at a time in sequence, varying the spatial order in which they were shown. A forward sequence was spatially ordered as though one were passing a stroke across the dots to connect them. Experiments compared this baseline condition to the following three conditions: a) the dot sequence was spatially ordered, but in the reverse direction from how letter strokes might normally be written; b) the dots in each stroke of the letter were displayed in a random order; c) the sequence of displayed dots were chosen for display from any location in the letter. Significant differences were found between the baseline condition and all three of the comparison conditions, with letter recognition being far worse for the random conditions than for conditions that provided consistent spatial ordering of dot sequences. These findings show that spatial order is critical for integration of shape cues that have been sequentially displayed.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224530
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Taylor Burchfield
Ernest Greene
spellingShingle Taylor Burchfield
Ernest Greene
Evaluating spatiotemporal integration of shape cues.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Taylor Burchfield
Ernest Greene
author_sort Taylor Burchfield
title Evaluating spatiotemporal integration of shape cues.
title_short Evaluating spatiotemporal integration of shape cues.
title_full Evaluating spatiotemporal integration of shape cues.
title_fullStr Evaluating spatiotemporal integration of shape cues.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating spatiotemporal integration of shape cues.
title_sort evaluating spatiotemporal integration of shape cues.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Prior work has shown that humans can successfully identify letters that are constructed with a sparse array of dots, wherein the dot pattern reflects the strokes that would normally be used to fashion a given letter. In the present work the dots were briefly displayed, one at a time in sequence, varying the spatial order in which they were shown. A forward sequence was spatially ordered as though one were passing a stroke across the dots to connect them. Experiments compared this baseline condition to the following three conditions: a) the dot sequence was spatially ordered, but in the reverse direction from how letter strokes might normally be written; b) the dots in each stroke of the letter were displayed in a random order; c) the sequence of displayed dots were chosen for display from any location in the letter. Significant differences were found between the baseline condition and all three of the comparison conditions, with letter recognition being far worse for the random conditions than for conditions that provided consistent spatial ordering of dot sequences. These findings show that spatial order is critical for integration of shape cues that have been sequentially displayed.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224530
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorburchfield evaluatingspatiotemporalintegrationofshapecues
AT ernestgreene evaluatingspatiotemporalintegrationofshapecues
_version_ 1714814314308698112