Antenatal counseling in maternal and newborn care: use of job aids to improve health worker performance and maternal understanding in Benin

• Main Authors: Yebadokpo André, Jennings Larissa, Affo Jean, Agbogbe Marthe
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2010-11-01
• Series: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
• Online Access: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/10/75

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Antenatal care provides an important opportunity to improve maternal understanding of care during and after pregnancy. Yet, studies suggest that communication is often insufficient. This research examined the effect of a job aids-focused intervention on quality of counseling and maternal understanding of care for mothers and newborns.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Counseling job aids were developed to support provider communication to pregnant women. Fourteen health facilities were randomized to control or intervention, where providers were trained to use job aids and provided implementation support. Direct observation of antenatal counseling sessions and patient exit interviews were undertaken to assess quality of counseling and maternal knowledge. Providers were also interviewed regarding their perceptions of the tools. Data were collected before and after the job aids intervention and analyzed using a difference-in-differences analysis to quantify relative changes over time.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mean percent of recommended messages provided to pregnant women significantly improved in the intervention arm as compared to the control arm in birth preparedness (difference-in-differences [Δ_I-C] = +17.9, 95%CI: 6.7,29.1), danger sign recognition (Δ_I-C= +26.0, 95%CI: 14.6,37.4), clean delivery (Δ_I-C= +21.7, 95%CI: 10.9,32.6), and newborn care (Δ_I-C= +26.2, 95%CI: 13.5,38.9). Significant gains were also observed in the mean percent of communication techniques applied (Δ_I-C= +28.8, 95%CI: 22.5,35.2) and duration (minutes) of antenatal consultations (Δ_I-C= +5.9, 95%CI: 3.0,8.8). No relative increase was found for messages relating to general prenatal care (Δ_I-C= +8.2, 95%CI: -2.6,19.1). The proportion of pregnant women with correct knowledge also significantly improved for birth preparedness (Δ_I-C= +23.6, 95%CI: 9.8,37.4), danger sign recognition (Δ_I-C= +28.7, 95%CI: 14.2,43.2), and clean delivery (Δ_I-C= +31.1, 95%CI: 19.4,42.9). There were no significant changes in maternal knowledge of general prenatal (Δ_I-C= -6.4, 95%CI: -21.3,8.5) or newborn care (Δ_I-C= +12.7, 95%CI: -6.1,31.5). Job aids were positively perceived by providers and pregnant women, although time constraints remained for health workers with other clinical responsibilities.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study demonstrates that a job aids-focused intervention can be integrated into routine antenatal care with positive outcomes on provider communication and maternal knowledge. Efforts are needed to address time constraints and other communication barriers, including introduction of on-going quality assessment for long-term sustainability.</p>