Tools of the State Regional Policy in the Russian Far East

The tools of the state regional policy in the Far East are varied and include regional programs, special economic zones, territorial development zones, the free port of Vladivostok, territories of advanced socio-economic development, and are aimed at selective support of individual territories. Ana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sergey Nikolaevich Leonov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Economic Research Institute of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2017-06-01
Series:Prostranstvennaâ Èkonomika
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.spatial-economics.com/images/spatial-econimics/2017_2/SE.2017.2.041-067.Leonov.pdf
id doaj-62aeee56e4664dca92c0526c4c460413
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62aeee56e4664dca92c0526c4c4604132020-11-25T01:19:20ZrusEconomic Research Institute of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesProstranstvennaâ Èkonomika1815-98342587-59572017-06-012416710.14530/se.2017.2.041-067Tools of the State Regional Policy in the Russian Far EastSergey Nikolaevich Leonov0Economic Research Institute FEB RAS The tools of the state regional policy in the Far East are varied and include regional programs, special economic zones, territorial development zones, the free port of Vladivostok, territories of advanced socio-economic development, and are aimed at selective support of individual territories. Analyzing the results of application of certain tools is complicated by the lack of unified definition of used terms, lack of information and methods for assessing the role of administrative preferences provided by authorities for implementation of regional projects. It is shown that the evaluation of effectiveness of applying the tools is done only during the validation of necessity of using specific tools, while the monitoring of ongoing projects and programs is done using the indicators of distribution and usage of investments. It is not enough for conclusive assessment of effectiveness. The excessive variety of tools of federal support for entrepreneurship in local zones in the Far East is mostly explained by disagreements between federal ministries. The article shows that the eagerness for creating territories with special regimes created high expectations and led to treating them as panacea, although none of the territories created in the Far East had shown any real effect of distribution of innovations. The conclusion is that it is sensible to improve the existing tools of federal support of local zones in the region, not to create the new oneshttp://www.spatial-economics.com/images/spatial-econimics/2017_2/SE.2017.2.041-067.Leonov.pdfregional programsspecial economic zonesterritorial development zonesterritories of advanced socio-economic developmentRussian Far Eas
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sergey Nikolaevich Leonov
spellingShingle Sergey Nikolaevich Leonov
Tools of the State Regional Policy in the Russian Far East
Prostranstvennaâ Èkonomika
regional programs
special economic zones
territorial development zones
territories of advanced socio-economic development
Russian Far Eas
author_facet Sergey Nikolaevich Leonov
author_sort Sergey Nikolaevich Leonov
title Tools of the State Regional Policy in the Russian Far East
title_short Tools of the State Regional Policy in the Russian Far East
title_full Tools of the State Regional Policy in the Russian Far East
title_fullStr Tools of the State Regional Policy in the Russian Far East
title_full_unstemmed Tools of the State Regional Policy in the Russian Far East
title_sort tools of the state regional policy in the russian far east
publisher Economic Research Institute of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
series Prostranstvennaâ Èkonomika
issn 1815-9834
2587-5957
publishDate 2017-06-01
description The tools of the state regional policy in the Far East are varied and include regional programs, special economic zones, territorial development zones, the free port of Vladivostok, territories of advanced socio-economic development, and are aimed at selective support of individual territories. Analyzing the results of application of certain tools is complicated by the lack of unified definition of used terms, lack of information and methods for assessing the role of administrative preferences provided by authorities for implementation of regional projects. It is shown that the evaluation of effectiveness of applying the tools is done only during the validation of necessity of using specific tools, while the monitoring of ongoing projects and programs is done using the indicators of distribution and usage of investments. It is not enough for conclusive assessment of effectiveness. The excessive variety of tools of federal support for entrepreneurship in local zones in the Far East is mostly explained by disagreements between federal ministries. The article shows that the eagerness for creating territories with special regimes created high expectations and led to treating them as panacea, although none of the territories created in the Far East had shown any real effect of distribution of innovations. The conclusion is that it is sensible to improve the existing tools of federal support of local zones in the region, not to create the new ones
topic regional programs
special economic zones
territorial development zones
territories of advanced socio-economic development
Russian Far Eas
url http://www.spatial-economics.com/images/spatial-econimics/2017_2/SE.2017.2.041-067.Leonov.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sergeynikolaevichleonov toolsofthestateregionalpolicyintherussianfareast
_version_ 1725138822034882560