Ambiguities in helical reconstruction
Helical polymers are found throughout biology and account for a substantial fraction of the protein in a cell. These filaments are very attractive for three-dimensional reconstruction from electron micrographs due to the fact that projections of these filaments show many different views of identical...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
2014-12-01
|
Series: | eLife |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://elifesciences.org/articles/04969 |
id |
doaj-62aed12e19294364b439a5fff8bbcbc6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-62aed12e19294364b439a5fff8bbcbc62021-05-04T23:34:01ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2014-12-01310.7554/eLife.04969Ambiguities in helical reconstructionEdward H Egelman0Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United StatesHelical polymers are found throughout biology and account for a substantial fraction of the protein in a cell. These filaments are very attractive for three-dimensional reconstruction from electron micrographs due to the fact that projections of these filaments show many different views of identical subunits in identical environments. However, ambiguities exist in defining the symmetry of a helical filament when one has limited resolution, and mistakes can be made. Until one reaches a near-atomic level of resolution, there are not necessarily reality-checks that can distinguish between correct and incorrect solutions. A recent paper in eLife (Xu et al., 2014) almost certainly imposed an incorrect helical symmetry and this can be seen using filament images posted by Xu et al. A comparison between the atomic model proposed and the published three-dimensional reconstruction should have suggested that an incorrect solution was found.https://elifesciences.org/articles/04969cryo-EMhelical symmetrythree-dimensional reconstruction |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Edward H Egelman |
spellingShingle |
Edward H Egelman Ambiguities in helical reconstruction eLife cryo-EM helical symmetry three-dimensional reconstruction |
author_facet |
Edward H Egelman |
author_sort |
Edward H Egelman |
title |
Ambiguities in helical reconstruction |
title_short |
Ambiguities in helical reconstruction |
title_full |
Ambiguities in helical reconstruction |
title_fullStr |
Ambiguities in helical reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ambiguities in helical reconstruction |
title_sort |
ambiguities in helical reconstruction |
publisher |
eLife Sciences Publications Ltd |
series |
eLife |
issn |
2050-084X |
publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
description |
Helical polymers are found throughout biology and account for a substantial fraction of the protein in a cell. These filaments are very attractive for three-dimensional reconstruction from electron micrographs due to the fact that projections of these filaments show many different views of identical subunits in identical environments. However, ambiguities exist in defining the symmetry of a helical filament when one has limited resolution, and mistakes can be made. Until one reaches a near-atomic level of resolution, there are not necessarily reality-checks that can distinguish between correct and incorrect solutions. A recent paper in eLife (Xu et al., 2014) almost certainly imposed an incorrect helical symmetry and this can be seen using filament images posted by Xu et al. A comparison between the atomic model proposed and the published three-dimensional reconstruction should have suggested that an incorrect solution was found. |
topic |
cryo-EM helical symmetry three-dimensional reconstruction |
url |
https://elifesciences.org/articles/04969 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT edwardhegelman ambiguitiesinhelicalreconstruction |
_version_ |
1721476972951896064 |