Comparing the Effect of Monofocal and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Macular Surgery

Aim. To compare the effects of previously implanted monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses (IOL) on macular surgery. Methods. Seventy eyes of 70 patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and symptomatic vitromacular traction syndrome that previously had IOL implantation for cataract surgery were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. Altun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1375298
id doaj-62ad6c0bf06047d2b6ae97c1202d3a49
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62ad6c0bf06047d2b6ae97c1202d3a492020-11-25T03:49:58ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582020-01-01202010.1155/2020/13752981375298Comparing the Effect of Monofocal and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Macular SurgeryA. Altun0Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul, TurkeyAim. To compare the effects of previously implanted monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses (IOL) on macular surgery. Methods. Seventy eyes of 70 patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and symptomatic vitromacular traction syndrome that previously had IOL implantation for cataract surgery were included in this prospective randomized clinical trial. Cases were divided into two groups. Group 1 and Group 2 were composed of eyes with monofocal and multifocal IOLs, respectively. The effects of refraction error and IOL decentration at the time of macular surgery performed for ERM and ILM peeling, according to the lens type, were investigated. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was performed to peel ERM and ILM in all cases. Complete ophthalmological examination, fundus fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography imaging were made to all cases, preoperatively and postoperatively. Results. The mean BCVA in Group 1 and Group 2 improved from 0.69 ± 0.15 and 0.38 ± 0.14 logMAR to 0.40 ± 0.14 and 0.10 ± 0.04 logMAR, respectively, at the 6th month. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the mean spherical refraction error (P>0.05) and IOL decentration level (P>0.05). The mean time required for macular surgery in Group 2 was statistically significantly longer than that for Group 1 (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant relationship between IOL decentration and macular surgery time in Group 1 (P>0.05), but there it was found in Group 2 (P<0.05). In Group 2, there was a positive correlation between IOL decentration and macular surgery time. Conclusion. In cases with multifocal IOL implants, especially with lens decentration, the time of macular surgery for ERM and ILM peeling during PPV is longer than that of eyes with monofocal IOL due to fluctuations in the clarity of the surgeon’s view.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1375298
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. Altun
spellingShingle A. Altun
Comparing the Effect of Monofocal and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Macular Surgery
Journal of Ophthalmology
author_facet A. Altun
author_sort A. Altun
title Comparing the Effect of Monofocal and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Macular Surgery
title_short Comparing the Effect of Monofocal and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Macular Surgery
title_full Comparing the Effect of Monofocal and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Macular Surgery
title_fullStr Comparing the Effect of Monofocal and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Macular Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Effect of Monofocal and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Macular Surgery
title_sort comparing the effect of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses on macular surgery
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Aim. To compare the effects of previously implanted monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses (IOL) on macular surgery. Methods. Seventy eyes of 70 patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and symptomatic vitromacular traction syndrome that previously had IOL implantation for cataract surgery were included in this prospective randomized clinical trial. Cases were divided into two groups. Group 1 and Group 2 were composed of eyes with monofocal and multifocal IOLs, respectively. The effects of refraction error and IOL decentration at the time of macular surgery performed for ERM and ILM peeling, according to the lens type, were investigated. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was performed to peel ERM and ILM in all cases. Complete ophthalmological examination, fundus fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography imaging were made to all cases, preoperatively and postoperatively. Results. The mean BCVA in Group 1 and Group 2 improved from 0.69 ± 0.15 and 0.38 ± 0.14 logMAR to 0.40 ± 0.14 and 0.10 ± 0.04 logMAR, respectively, at the 6th month. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the mean spherical refraction error (P>0.05) and IOL decentration level (P>0.05). The mean time required for macular surgery in Group 2 was statistically significantly longer than that for Group 1 (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant relationship between IOL decentration and macular surgery time in Group 1 (P>0.05), but there it was found in Group 2 (P<0.05). In Group 2, there was a positive correlation between IOL decentration and macular surgery time. Conclusion. In cases with multifocal IOL implants, especially with lens decentration, the time of macular surgery for ERM and ILM peeling during PPV is longer than that of eyes with monofocal IOL due to fluctuations in the clarity of the surgeon’s view.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1375298
work_keys_str_mv AT aaltun comparingtheeffectofmonofocalandmultifocalintraocularlensesonmacularsurgery
_version_ 1715107916412878848