Integrating the Disciplines of Law and Biology: Dealing with Clashing Paradigms
This article considers the difficulties that a researcher on the border between normative and explanatory sciences may encounter. The article begins with an introduction to the field: the integration of law and biology. It appears that this kind of interdisciplinary research is not only a challenge...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Utrecht University School of Law
2015-07-01
|
Series: | Utrecht Law Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.316/ |
id |
doaj-62aace47b16e43c88fbc273a0d51aac9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-62aace47b16e43c88fbc273a0d51aac92020-11-25T03:55:12ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2015-07-01112344810.18352/ulr.316309Integrating the Disciplines of Law and Biology: Dealing with Clashing ParadigmsHendrik Gommer0Science and Society Group, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of GroningenThis article considers the difficulties that a researcher on the border between normative and explanatory sciences may encounter. The article begins with an introduction to the field: the integration of law and biology. It appears that this kind of interdisciplinary research is not only a challenge for the researcher himself, but also for his readers. Concepts are not understood, assumptions differ, ‘peers’ are not really peers, and new paradigms cannot be proven. Thus integrating law and biology turns into some kind of battle between notions of truth, paradigms. A battle that cannot be resolved by proofs. One solution is to create a gap between law and biology, normative science and empirical science. Another solution may be translating concepts.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.316/integrationlawbiologyparadigmscooperationjustification |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hendrik Gommer |
spellingShingle |
Hendrik Gommer Integrating the Disciplines of Law and Biology: Dealing with Clashing Paradigms Utrecht Law Review integration law biology paradigms cooperation justification |
author_facet |
Hendrik Gommer |
author_sort |
Hendrik Gommer |
title |
Integrating the Disciplines of Law and Biology: Dealing with Clashing Paradigms |
title_short |
Integrating the Disciplines of Law and Biology: Dealing with Clashing Paradigms |
title_full |
Integrating the Disciplines of Law and Biology: Dealing with Clashing Paradigms |
title_fullStr |
Integrating the Disciplines of Law and Biology: Dealing with Clashing Paradigms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Integrating the Disciplines of Law and Biology: Dealing with Clashing Paradigms |
title_sort |
integrating the disciplines of law and biology: dealing with clashing paradigms |
publisher |
Utrecht University School of Law |
series |
Utrecht Law Review |
issn |
1871-515X |
publishDate |
2015-07-01 |
description |
This article considers the difficulties that a researcher on the border between normative and explanatory sciences may encounter. The article begins with an introduction to the field: the integration of law and biology. It appears that this kind of interdisciplinary research is not only a challenge for the researcher himself, but also for his readers. Concepts are not understood, assumptions differ, ‘peers’ are not really peers, and new paradigms cannot be proven. Thus integrating law and biology turns into some kind of battle between notions of truth, paradigms. A battle that cannot be resolved by proofs. One solution is to create a gap between law and biology, normative science and empirical science. Another solution may be translating concepts. |
topic |
integration law biology paradigms cooperation justification |
url |
http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.316/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hendrikgommer integratingthedisciplinesoflawandbiologydealingwithclashingparadigms |
_version_ |
1724470021775687680 |