Integrating the Disciplines of Law and Biology: Dealing with Clashing Paradigms

This article considers the difficulties that a researcher on the border between normative and explanatory sciences may encounter. The article begins with an introduction to the field: the integration of law and biology. It appears that this kind of interdisciplinary research is not only a challenge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hendrik Gommer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University School of Law 2015-07-01
Series:Utrecht Law Review
Subjects:
law
Online Access:http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.316/
id doaj-62aace47b16e43c88fbc273a0d51aac9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62aace47b16e43c88fbc273a0d51aac92020-11-25T03:55:12ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2015-07-01112344810.18352/ulr.316309Integrating the Disciplines of Law and Biology: Dealing with Clashing ParadigmsHendrik Gommer0Science and Society Group, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of GroningenThis article considers the difficulties that a researcher on the border between normative and explanatory sciences may encounter. The article begins with an introduction to the field: the integration of law and biology. It appears that this kind of interdisciplinary research is not only a challenge for the researcher himself, but also for his readers. Concepts are not understood, assumptions differ, ‘peers’ are not really peers, and new paradigms cannot be proven. Thus integrating law and biology turns into some kind of battle between notions of truth, paradigms. A battle that cannot be resolved by proofs. One solution is to create a gap between law and biology, normative science and empirical science. Another solution may be translating concepts.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.316/integrationlawbiologyparadigmscooperationjustification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hendrik Gommer
spellingShingle Hendrik Gommer
Integrating the Disciplines of Law and Biology: Dealing with Clashing Paradigms
Utrecht Law Review
integration
law
biology
paradigms
cooperation
justification
author_facet Hendrik Gommer
author_sort Hendrik Gommer
title Integrating the Disciplines of Law and Biology: Dealing with Clashing Paradigms
title_short Integrating the Disciplines of Law and Biology: Dealing with Clashing Paradigms
title_full Integrating the Disciplines of Law and Biology: Dealing with Clashing Paradigms
title_fullStr Integrating the Disciplines of Law and Biology: Dealing with Clashing Paradigms
title_full_unstemmed Integrating the Disciplines of Law and Biology: Dealing with Clashing Paradigms
title_sort integrating the disciplines of law and biology: dealing with clashing paradigms
publisher Utrecht University School of Law
series Utrecht Law Review
issn 1871-515X
publishDate 2015-07-01
description This article considers the difficulties that a researcher on the border between normative and explanatory sciences may encounter. The article begins with an introduction to the field: the integration of law and biology. It appears that this kind of interdisciplinary research is not only a challenge for the researcher himself, but also for his readers. Concepts are not understood, assumptions differ, ‘peers’ are not really peers, and new paradigms cannot be proven. Thus integrating law and biology turns into some kind of battle between notions of truth, paradigms. A battle that cannot be resolved by proofs. One solution is to create a gap between law and biology, normative science and empirical science. Another solution may be translating concepts.
topic integration
law
biology
paradigms
cooperation
justification
url http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.316/
work_keys_str_mv AT hendrikgommer integratingthedisciplinesoflawandbiologydealingwithclashingparadigms
_version_ 1724470021775687680