Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging

Almost six decades after the first proposals to define and evaluate the quality of individual aging, the first indexes for assessing the aging process at the societal level have appeared. Moreover, in five years, three different scores for measuring societal aging have been developed and tested in d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jean-Pierre Michel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korea Geriatrics Society 2019-06-01
Series:Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-agmr.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.4235/agmr.19.0017
id doaj-62aa835f0e0b401e826094d846fa2658
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62aa835f0e0b401e826094d846fa26582020-11-24T22:06:51ZengKorea Geriatrics SocietyAnnals of Geriatric Medicine and Research2508-47982019-06-01232454910.4235/agmr.19.0017agmr.19.0017Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy AgingJean-Pierre Michel0Geriatric Department, University of Geneva, Geneva, SwitzerlandAlmost six decades after the first proposals to define and evaluate the quality of individual aging, the first indexes for assessing the aging process at the societal level have appeared. Moreover, in five years, three different scores for measuring societal aging have been developed and tested in different areas. The Global Age Watch Index focused on 96 countries from around the world, while the Active Ageing index is limited to the European Union countries and the Ageing Society Index targets Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. This paper analyzed and compared the results of these three indexes. The rankings vary little at the bottom end of the scale, with the same countries consistently ranked among the lowest scores (for example, Poland ranked last among the European countries in the three indexes). The same is true at the top of the rankings, with Sweden, the Netherlands, and Ireland consistently among the high-scoring countries. However, the three indices tend to differently rank the countries in the middle. The United States, for example, is ranked ninth in the Global Age Watch 2015 and third in the Ageing Societal Index 2018. In cases in which the results are not consistent, it is difficult for politicians and policymakers to adequately identify needs and orient the policy to promote active and healthy aging. There is clearly a compelling need for wide-scale debate to reach a consensus on a comprehensive score or index at the societal level.http://www.e-agmr.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.4235/agmr.19.0017Healthy agingSuccessful agingAging indexesAging scoresAgeing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jean-Pierre Michel
spellingShingle Jean-Pierre Michel
Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Healthy aging
Successful aging
Aging indexes
Aging scores
Ageing
author_facet Jean-Pierre Michel
author_sort Jean-Pierre Michel
title Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging
title_short Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging
title_full Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging
title_fullStr Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging
title_full_unstemmed Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging
title_sort identification of the best societal measurement of healthy aging
publisher Korea Geriatrics Society
series Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
issn 2508-4798
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Almost six decades after the first proposals to define and evaluate the quality of individual aging, the first indexes for assessing the aging process at the societal level have appeared. Moreover, in five years, three different scores for measuring societal aging have been developed and tested in different areas. The Global Age Watch Index focused on 96 countries from around the world, while the Active Ageing index is limited to the European Union countries and the Ageing Society Index targets Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. This paper analyzed and compared the results of these three indexes. The rankings vary little at the bottom end of the scale, with the same countries consistently ranked among the lowest scores (for example, Poland ranked last among the European countries in the three indexes). The same is true at the top of the rankings, with Sweden, the Netherlands, and Ireland consistently among the high-scoring countries. However, the three indices tend to differently rank the countries in the middle. The United States, for example, is ranked ninth in the Global Age Watch 2015 and third in the Ageing Societal Index 2018. In cases in which the results are not consistent, it is difficult for politicians and policymakers to adequately identify needs and orient the policy to promote active and healthy aging. There is clearly a compelling need for wide-scale debate to reach a consensus on a comprehensive score or index at the societal level.
topic Healthy aging
Successful aging
Aging indexes
Aging scores
Ageing
url http://www.e-agmr.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.4235/agmr.19.0017
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanpierremichel identificationofthebestsocietalmeasurementofhealthyaging
_version_ 1725821414355763200