How does competition among wild type mosquitoes influence the performance of Aedes aegypti and dissemination of Wolbachia pipientis?

Wolbachia has been deployed in several countries to reduce transmission of dengue, Zika and chikungunya viruses. During releases, Wolbachia-infected females are likely to lay their eggs in local available breeding sites, which might already be colonized by local Aedes sp. mosquitoes. Therefore, ther...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suellen de Oliveira, Daniel Antunes Maciel Villela, Fernando Braga Stehling Dias, Luciano Andrade Moreira, Rafael Maciel de Freitas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-10-01
Series:PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5648260?pdf=render
id doaj-62a24dbf03434d0691343de7ce823b6c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62a24dbf03434d0691343de7ce823b6c2020-11-25T02:47:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases1935-27271935-27352017-10-011110e000594710.1371/journal.pntd.0005947How does competition among wild type mosquitoes influence the performance of Aedes aegypti and dissemination of Wolbachia pipientis?Suellen de OliveiraDaniel Antunes Maciel VillelaFernando Braga Stehling DiasLuciano Andrade MoreiraRafael Maciel de FreitasWolbachia has been deployed in several countries to reduce transmission of dengue, Zika and chikungunya viruses. During releases, Wolbachia-infected females are likely to lay their eggs in local available breeding sites, which might already be colonized by local Aedes sp. mosquitoes. Therefore, there is an urgent need to estimate the deleterious effects of intra and interspecific larval competition on mosquito life history traits, especially on the duration of larval development time, larval mortality and adult size.Three different mosquito populations were used: Ae. aegypti infected with Wolbachia (wMelBr strain), wild Ae. aegypti and wild Ae. albopictus. A total of 21 treatments explored intra and interspecific larval competition with varying larval densities, species proportions and food levels. Each treatment had eight replicates with two distinct food levels: 0.25 or 0.50 g of Chitosan and fallen avocado leaves. Overall, overcrowding reduced fitness correlates of the three populations. Ae. albopictus larvae presented lower larval mortality, shorter development time to adult and smaller wing sizes than Ae. aegypti. The presence of Wolbachia had a slight positive effect on larval biology, since infected individuals had higher survivorship than uninfected Ae. aegypti larvae.In all treatments, Ae. albopictus outperformed both wild Ae. aegypti and the Wolbachia-infected group in larval competition, irrespective of larval density and the amount of food resources. The major force that can slow down Wolbachia invasion is the population density of wild mosquitoes. Given that Ae. aegypti currently dominates in Rio, in comparison with Ae. albopictus frequency, additional attention must be given to the population density of Ae. aegypti during releases to increase the likelihood of Wolbachia invasion.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5648260?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Suellen de Oliveira
Daniel Antunes Maciel Villela
Fernando Braga Stehling Dias
Luciano Andrade Moreira
Rafael Maciel de Freitas
spellingShingle Suellen de Oliveira
Daniel Antunes Maciel Villela
Fernando Braga Stehling Dias
Luciano Andrade Moreira
Rafael Maciel de Freitas
How does competition among wild type mosquitoes influence the performance of Aedes aegypti and dissemination of Wolbachia pipientis?
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
author_facet Suellen de Oliveira
Daniel Antunes Maciel Villela
Fernando Braga Stehling Dias
Luciano Andrade Moreira
Rafael Maciel de Freitas
author_sort Suellen de Oliveira
title How does competition among wild type mosquitoes influence the performance of Aedes aegypti and dissemination of Wolbachia pipientis?
title_short How does competition among wild type mosquitoes influence the performance of Aedes aegypti and dissemination of Wolbachia pipientis?
title_full How does competition among wild type mosquitoes influence the performance of Aedes aegypti and dissemination of Wolbachia pipientis?
title_fullStr How does competition among wild type mosquitoes influence the performance of Aedes aegypti and dissemination of Wolbachia pipientis?
title_full_unstemmed How does competition among wild type mosquitoes influence the performance of Aedes aegypti and dissemination of Wolbachia pipientis?
title_sort how does competition among wild type mosquitoes influence the performance of aedes aegypti and dissemination of wolbachia pipientis?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
issn 1935-2727
1935-2735
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Wolbachia has been deployed in several countries to reduce transmission of dengue, Zika and chikungunya viruses. During releases, Wolbachia-infected females are likely to lay their eggs in local available breeding sites, which might already be colonized by local Aedes sp. mosquitoes. Therefore, there is an urgent need to estimate the deleterious effects of intra and interspecific larval competition on mosquito life history traits, especially on the duration of larval development time, larval mortality and adult size.Three different mosquito populations were used: Ae. aegypti infected with Wolbachia (wMelBr strain), wild Ae. aegypti and wild Ae. albopictus. A total of 21 treatments explored intra and interspecific larval competition with varying larval densities, species proportions and food levels. Each treatment had eight replicates with two distinct food levels: 0.25 or 0.50 g of Chitosan and fallen avocado leaves. Overall, overcrowding reduced fitness correlates of the three populations. Ae. albopictus larvae presented lower larval mortality, shorter development time to adult and smaller wing sizes than Ae. aegypti. The presence of Wolbachia had a slight positive effect on larval biology, since infected individuals had higher survivorship than uninfected Ae. aegypti larvae.In all treatments, Ae. albopictus outperformed both wild Ae. aegypti and the Wolbachia-infected group in larval competition, irrespective of larval density and the amount of food resources. The major force that can slow down Wolbachia invasion is the population density of wild mosquitoes. Given that Ae. aegypti currently dominates in Rio, in comparison with Ae. albopictus frequency, additional attention must be given to the population density of Ae. aegypti during releases to increase the likelihood of Wolbachia invasion.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5648260?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT suellendeoliveira howdoescompetitionamongwildtypemosquitoesinfluencetheperformanceofaedesaegyptianddisseminationofwolbachiapipientis
AT danielantunesmacielvillela howdoescompetitionamongwildtypemosquitoesinfluencetheperformanceofaedesaegyptianddisseminationofwolbachiapipientis
AT fernandobragastehlingdias howdoescompetitionamongwildtypemosquitoesinfluencetheperformanceofaedesaegyptianddisseminationofwolbachiapipientis
AT lucianoandrademoreira howdoescompetitionamongwildtypemosquitoesinfluencetheperformanceofaedesaegyptianddisseminationofwolbachiapipientis
AT rafaelmacieldefreitas howdoescompetitionamongwildtypemosquitoesinfluencetheperformanceofaedesaegyptianddisseminationofwolbachiapipientis
_version_ 1724755413600043008