Blockchains, Formulary Evaluations and Health Technology Assessment

Blockchains have the potential, if appropriately implemented and managed, of contributing to a fundamental change in the application of techniques of health technology assessment in formulary decision making. Rather than continuing to rely on claims made by manufacturers that are non-evaluable, the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul Langley, Robert E Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2018-11-01
Series:INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/1445
id doaj-629eb01d5fab48928032e08f5f539c0e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-629eb01d5fab48928032e08f5f539c0e2020-11-25T03:17:45ZengUniversity of Minnesota Libraries PublishingINNOVATIONS in Pharmacy2155-04172018-11-019410.24926/iip.v9i4.1445Blockchains, Formulary Evaluations and Health Technology AssessmentPaul Langley0Robert E MartinUniversity of Minnesota Blockchains have the potential, if appropriately implemented and managed, of contributing to a fundamental change in the application of techniques of health technology assessment in formulary decision making. Rather than continuing to rely on claims made by manufacturers that are non-evaluable, the introduction of blockchains as adjunct to the electronic medical record, meet an unmet medical need in enabling a platform for the real time assessment of claims. Rather than focusing the case for their product on lifetime cost-per-QALY models, which have no chance of ever being validated, the blockchain platform offers a low cost opportunity for claims evaluation. Manufacturers would be required to abandon the construction of imaginary cost-per-QALY worlds to support claims for pricing and formulary trier position, in favor of claims that can be evaluated and reported back to formulary committees in a short yet meaningful time horizon. Manufacturers would present a claims assessment protocol as part of the formulary submission package. If agreed with the formulary committee, the protocol would be implemented and managed through the patient blockchain membership. Claims would be monitored and evaluated in real time with a final report to the formulary committee in a matter of months. Lifetime imaginary claims for cost-per-QALY, set alongside willingness-to-pay thresholds, would be a thing of the past. Pricing decisions and formulary placement would reflect a robust evidence base and not just extrapolations from pivotal clinical trials.   Article Type: Commentary https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/1445blockchain technology, blockchains in health, barriers to blockchain implementation, health data property rights
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul Langley
Robert E Martin
spellingShingle Paul Langley
Robert E Martin
Blockchains, Formulary Evaluations and Health Technology Assessment
INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
blockchain technology, blockchains in health, barriers to blockchain implementation, health data property rights
author_facet Paul Langley
Robert E Martin
author_sort Paul Langley
title Blockchains, Formulary Evaluations and Health Technology Assessment
title_short Blockchains, Formulary Evaluations and Health Technology Assessment
title_full Blockchains, Formulary Evaluations and Health Technology Assessment
title_fullStr Blockchains, Formulary Evaluations and Health Technology Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Blockchains, Formulary Evaluations and Health Technology Assessment
title_sort blockchains, formulary evaluations and health technology assessment
publisher University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
series INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
issn 2155-0417
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Blockchains have the potential, if appropriately implemented and managed, of contributing to a fundamental change in the application of techniques of health technology assessment in formulary decision making. Rather than continuing to rely on claims made by manufacturers that are non-evaluable, the introduction of blockchains as adjunct to the electronic medical record, meet an unmet medical need in enabling a platform for the real time assessment of claims. Rather than focusing the case for their product on lifetime cost-per-QALY models, which have no chance of ever being validated, the blockchain platform offers a low cost opportunity for claims evaluation. Manufacturers would be required to abandon the construction of imaginary cost-per-QALY worlds to support claims for pricing and formulary trier position, in favor of claims that can be evaluated and reported back to formulary committees in a short yet meaningful time horizon. Manufacturers would present a claims assessment protocol as part of the formulary submission package. If agreed with the formulary committee, the protocol would be implemented and managed through the patient blockchain membership. Claims would be monitored and evaluated in real time with a final report to the formulary committee in a matter of months. Lifetime imaginary claims for cost-per-QALY, set alongside willingness-to-pay thresholds, would be a thing of the past. Pricing decisions and formulary placement would reflect a robust evidence base and not just extrapolations from pivotal clinical trials.   Article Type: Commentary
topic blockchain technology, blockchains in health, barriers to blockchain implementation, health data property rights
url https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/1445
work_keys_str_mv AT paullangley blockchainsformularyevaluationsandhealthtechnologyassessment
AT robertemartin blockchainsformularyevaluationsandhealthtechnologyassessment
_version_ 1724630240219627520