Exploring statistical and population aspects of network complexity.

The characterization and the definition of the complexity of objects is an important but very difficult problem that attracted much interest in many different fields. In this paper we introduce a new measure, called network diversity score (NDS), which allows us to quantify structural properties of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frank Emmert-Streib, Matthias Dehmer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3348134?pdf=render
id doaj-6299c4ea259f4100a70df435647e378f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6299c4ea259f4100a70df435647e378f2020-11-25T02:26:58ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0175e3452310.1371/journal.pone.0034523Exploring statistical and population aspects of network complexity.Frank Emmert-StreibMatthias DehmerThe characterization and the definition of the complexity of objects is an important but very difficult problem that attracted much interest in many different fields. In this paper we introduce a new measure, called network diversity score (NDS), which allows us to quantify structural properties of networks. We demonstrate numerically that our diversity score is capable of distinguishing ordered, random and complex networks from each other and, hence, allowing us to categorize networks with respect to their structural complexity. We study 16 additional network complexity measures and find that none of these measures has similar good categorization capabilities. In contrast to many other measures suggested so far aiming for a characterization of the structural complexity of networks, our score is different for a variety of reasons. First, our score is multiplicatively composed of four individual scores, each assessing different structural properties of a network. That means our composite score reflects the structural diversity of a network. Second, our score is defined for a population of networks instead of individual networks. We will show that this removes an unwanted ambiguity, inherently present in measures that are based on single networks. In order to apply our measure practically, we provide a statistical estimator for the diversity score, which is based on a finite number of samples.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3348134?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frank Emmert-Streib
Matthias Dehmer
spellingShingle Frank Emmert-Streib
Matthias Dehmer
Exploring statistical and population aspects of network complexity.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Frank Emmert-Streib
Matthias Dehmer
author_sort Frank Emmert-Streib
title Exploring statistical and population aspects of network complexity.
title_short Exploring statistical and population aspects of network complexity.
title_full Exploring statistical and population aspects of network complexity.
title_fullStr Exploring statistical and population aspects of network complexity.
title_full_unstemmed Exploring statistical and population aspects of network complexity.
title_sort exploring statistical and population aspects of network complexity.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description The characterization and the definition of the complexity of objects is an important but very difficult problem that attracted much interest in many different fields. In this paper we introduce a new measure, called network diversity score (NDS), which allows us to quantify structural properties of networks. We demonstrate numerically that our diversity score is capable of distinguishing ordered, random and complex networks from each other and, hence, allowing us to categorize networks with respect to their structural complexity. We study 16 additional network complexity measures and find that none of these measures has similar good categorization capabilities. In contrast to many other measures suggested so far aiming for a characterization of the structural complexity of networks, our score is different for a variety of reasons. First, our score is multiplicatively composed of four individual scores, each assessing different structural properties of a network. That means our composite score reflects the structural diversity of a network. Second, our score is defined for a population of networks instead of individual networks. We will show that this removes an unwanted ambiguity, inherently present in measures that are based on single networks. In order to apply our measure practically, we provide a statistical estimator for the diversity score, which is based on a finite number of samples.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3348134?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT frankemmertstreib exploringstatisticalandpopulationaspectsofnetworkcomplexity
AT matthiasdehmer exploringstatisticalandpopulationaspectsofnetworkcomplexity
_version_ 1724844894981193728