A Topological View on Optical and Phononic Fabry–Perot Microcavities through the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger Model

Advances in nanofabrication technologies have enabled the study of acoustic wave phenomena in the technologically relevant GHz–THz range. First steps towards applying concepts from topology in nanophononics were made with the proposal of a new topological acoustic resonator, based on the concept of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Esmann, Norberto Daniel Lanzillotti-Kimura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-03-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/8/4/527
id doaj-6290fe1daa4c44f8814fa25bbe5d0992
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6290fe1daa4c44f8814fa25bbe5d09922020-11-25T02:30:51ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172018-03-018452710.3390/app8040527app8040527A Topological View on Optical and Phononic Fabry–Perot Microcavities through the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger ModelMartin Esmann0Norberto Daniel Lanzillotti-Kimura1Centre de Nanosciences et de Nanotechnologies, CNRS, Université Paris Sud, Université Paris Saclay, C2N Marcoussis, 91460 Marcoussis, FranceCentre de Nanosciences et de Nanotechnologies, CNRS, Université Paris Sud, Université Paris Saclay, C2N Marcoussis, 91460 Marcoussis, FranceAdvances in nanofabrication technologies have enabled the study of acoustic wave phenomena in the technologically relevant GHz–THz range. First steps towards applying concepts from topology in nanophononics were made with the proposal of a new topological acoustic resonator, based on the concept of band inversion. In topology, the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger (SSH) model is the paradigm that accounts for the topological properties of many one-dimensional structures. Both the classical Fabry–Perot resonator and the reported topological resonators are based on Distributed Bragg Reflectors (DBRs). A clear and detailed relation between the two systems, however, is still lacking. Here, we show how a parallelism between the standard DBR-based acoustic Fabry–Perot type cavity and the SSH model of polyacetylene can be established. We discuss the existence of surface modes in acoustic DBRs and interface modes in concatenated DBRs and show that these modes are equivalent to Fabry–Perot type cavity modes. Although it is not possible to assign topological invariants to both acoustic bands enclosing the considered minigap in the nanophononic Fabry–Perot case, the existence of the confined mode in a Fabry–Perot cavity can nevertheless be interpreted in terms of the symmetry inversion of the Bloch modes at the Brillouin zone edge.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/8/4/527nanomechanicsacousticsband inversiontopologyZak phaseSu–Schrieffer–Heeger model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin Esmann
Norberto Daniel Lanzillotti-Kimura
spellingShingle Martin Esmann
Norberto Daniel Lanzillotti-Kimura
A Topological View on Optical and Phononic Fabry–Perot Microcavities through the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger Model
Applied Sciences
nanomechanics
acoustics
band inversion
topology
Zak phase
Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model
author_facet Martin Esmann
Norberto Daniel Lanzillotti-Kimura
author_sort Martin Esmann
title A Topological View on Optical and Phononic Fabry–Perot Microcavities through the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger Model
title_short A Topological View on Optical and Phononic Fabry–Perot Microcavities through the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger Model
title_full A Topological View on Optical and Phononic Fabry–Perot Microcavities through the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger Model
title_fullStr A Topological View on Optical and Phononic Fabry–Perot Microcavities through the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger Model
title_full_unstemmed A Topological View on Optical and Phononic Fabry–Perot Microcavities through the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger Model
title_sort topological view on optical and phononic fabry–perot microcavities through the su–schrieffer–heeger model
publisher MDPI AG
series Applied Sciences
issn 2076-3417
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Advances in nanofabrication technologies have enabled the study of acoustic wave phenomena in the technologically relevant GHz–THz range. First steps towards applying concepts from topology in nanophononics were made with the proposal of a new topological acoustic resonator, based on the concept of band inversion. In topology, the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger (SSH) model is the paradigm that accounts for the topological properties of many one-dimensional structures. Both the classical Fabry–Perot resonator and the reported topological resonators are based on Distributed Bragg Reflectors (DBRs). A clear and detailed relation between the two systems, however, is still lacking. Here, we show how a parallelism between the standard DBR-based acoustic Fabry–Perot type cavity and the SSH model of polyacetylene can be established. We discuss the existence of surface modes in acoustic DBRs and interface modes in concatenated DBRs and show that these modes are equivalent to Fabry–Perot type cavity modes. Although it is not possible to assign topological invariants to both acoustic bands enclosing the considered minigap in the nanophononic Fabry–Perot case, the existence of the confined mode in a Fabry–Perot cavity can nevertheless be interpreted in terms of the symmetry inversion of the Bloch modes at the Brillouin zone edge.
topic nanomechanics
acoustics
band inversion
topology
Zak phase
Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/8/4/527
work_keys_str_mv AT martinesmann atopologicalviewonopticalandphononicfabryperotmicrocavitiesthroughthesuschriefferheegermodel
AT norbertodaniellanzillottikimura atopologicalviewonopticalandphononicfabryperotmicrocavitiesthroughthesuschriefferheegermodel
AT martinesmann topologicalviewonopticalandphononicfabryperotmicrocavitiesthroughthesuschriefferheegermodel
AT norbertodaniellanzillottikimura topologicalviewonopticalandphononicfabryperotmicrocavitiesthroughthesuschriefferheegermodel
_version_ 1724827440682893312