Representations of Power in the Byzantios Oration of Theodore Metochites: Illusions and Realities

The early 14th century and so far very little commented on Byzantios logos by Theodore Metochites appears to be the first surviving, lengthy, and independent city encomium in the Greek language since the 4th century Antiochikos logos by Libanios. Metochites seems to be quite familiar with the late a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alexandra Voudourie
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 2013-04-01
Series:Παρεκβολαί
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ejournals.lib.auth.gr/parekbolai/article/view/3995
id doaj-627275c62419473cb776538059b1d483
record_format Article
spelling doaj-627275c62419473cb776538059b1d4832021-08-02T05:44:24ZdeuAristotle University of ThessalonikiΠαρεκβολαί2241-02282241-02282013-04-0131107130Representations of Power in the Byzantios Oration of Theodore Metochites: Illusions and RealitiesAlexandra Voudourie0National and Kapodistrian University of AthensThe early 14th century and so far very little commented on Byzantios logos by Theodore Metochites appears to be the first surviving, lengthy, and independent city encomium in the Greek language since the 4th century Antiochikos logos by Libanios. Metochites seems to be quite familiar with the late antique tradition of the extended independent city praises and as a result the 70 folia long laus Constantinopolitana, includes all the expected, and power-indicating praising themes: thesis, foundation, walls, secular buildings and other infrastructure, occupations of the citizens, internal and external beauty, piety of the citizens and churches, secular education, ports and trade, commonwealth and cosmopolitanism, ecumenical character, intense Christian faith and synkrisis with other famous cities. But can an encomium of Constantinople, written in the dramatic first decade of the 14th century, really be a source of any power representations at all? Or should one reassess the encomiastic topoi and attempt to distinguish fact from fiction and power from illusion of power? Finally, can the lengthier and more persistent analysis of particular features serve as a proof of their more realistic character? The above questions are approached by using some hidden dating indicators of Byzantios logos, in addition to a critical evaluation of Metochites᾽ use of the late antique rhetorical guidelines, and in the light of the latest research on the economic and spiritual life in early Palaiologan Constantinople.http://ejournals.lib.auth.gr/parekbolai/article/view/3995Theodore MetochitesByzantiosPalaiologan periodConstantinople
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexandra Voudourie
spellingShingle Alexandra Voudourie
Representations of Power in the Byzantios Oration of Theodore Metochites: Illusions and Realities
Παρεκβολαί
Theodore Metochites
Byzantios
Palaiologan period
Constantinople
author_facet Alexandra Voudourie
author_sort Alexandra Voudourie
title Representations of Power in the Byzantios Oration of Theodore Metochites: Illusions and Realities
title_short Representations of Power in the Byzantios Oration of Theodore Metochites: Illusions and Realities
title_full Representations of Power in the Byzantios Oration of Theodore Metochites: Illusions and Realities
title_fullStr Representations of Power in the Byzantios Oration of Theodore Metochites: Illusions and Realities
title_full_unstemmed Representations of Power in the Byzantios Oration of Theodore Metochites: Illusions and Realities
title_sort representations of power in the byzantios oration of theodore metochites: illusions and realities
publisher Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
series Παρεκβολαί
issn 2241-0228
2241-0228
publishDate 2013-04-01
description The early 14th century and so far very little commented on Byzantios logos by Theodore Metochites appears to be the first surviving, lengthy, and independent city encomium in the Greek language since the 4th century Antiochikos logos by Libanios. Metochites seems to be quite familiar with the late antique tradition of the extended independent city praises and as a result the 70 folia long laus Constantinopolitana, includes all the expected, and power-indicating praising themes: thesis, foundation, walls, secular buildings and other infrastructure, occupations of the citizens, internal and external beauty, piety of the citizens and churches, secular education, ports and trade, commonwealth and cosmopolitanism, ecumenical character, intense Christian faith and synkrisis with other famous cities. But can an encomium of Constantinople, written in the dramatic first decade of the 14th century, really be a source of any power representations at all? Or should one reassess the encomiastic topoi and attempt to distinguish fact from fiction and power from illusion of power? Finally, can the lengthier and more persistent analysis of particular features serve as a proof of their more realistic character? The above questions are approached by using some hidden dating indicators of Byzantios logos, in addition to a critical evaluation of Metochites᾽ use of the late antique rhetorical guidelines, and in the light of the latest research on the economic and spiritual life in early Palaiologan Constantinople.
topic Theodore Metochites
Byzantios
Palaiologan period
Constantinople
url http://ejournals.lib.auth.gr/parekbolai/article/view/3995
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandravoudourie representationsofpowerinthebyzantiosorationoftheodoremetochitesillusionsandrealities
_version_ 1721240949742370816