Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Introduction Chronic subdural haematomas (CSDHs) are one of the most common neurosurgical conditions. The goal of surgery is to alleviate symptoms and minimise the risk of symptomatic recurrences. In the past, reoperation rates as high as 20%–30% were described for CSDH recurrences. However, followi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonas Ranstam, Ville Leinonen, Rahul Raj, Simo Taimela, Kimmo Lönnrot, Janek Frantzen, Teppo Jarvinen, Jarno Satopää, Pihla Tommiska, Christoph Schwartz, Riku Kivisaari, T Luostarinen, Jussi Posti, Teemu M Luoto, Sami Tetri, Timo Koivisto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/6/e038275.full
id doaj-626f8bd46bf34dd89453ec289c6ac2f1
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jonas Ranstam
Ville Leinonen
Rahul Raj
Simo Taimela
Kimmo Lönnrot
Janek Frantzen
Teppo Jarvinen
Jarno Satopää
Pihla Tommiska
Christoph Schwartz
Riku Kivisaari
T Luostarinen
Jussi Posti
Teemu M Luoto
Sami Tetri
Timo Koivisto
spellingShingle Jonas Ranstam
Ville Leinonen
Rahul Raj
Simo Taimela
Kimmo Lönnrot
Janek Frantzen
Teppo Jarvinen
Jarno Satopää
Pihla Tommiska
Christoph Schwartz
Riku Kivisaari
T Luostarinen
Jussi Posti
Teemu M Luoto
Sami Tetri
Timo Koivisto
Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
BMJ Open
author_facet Jonas Ranstam
Ville Leinonen
Rahul Raj
Simo Taimela
Kimmo Lönnrot
Janek Frantzen
Teppo Jarvinen
Jarno Satopää
Pihla Tommiska
Christoph Schwartz
Riku Kivisaari
T Luostarinen
Jussi Posti
Teemu M Luoto
Sami Tetri
Timo Koivisto
author_sort Jonas Ranstam
title Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_short Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_sort finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (finish): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Introduction Chronic subdural haematomas (CSDHs) are one of the most common neurosurgical conditions. The goal of surgery is to alleviate symptoms and minimise the risk of symptomatic recurrences. In the past, reoperation rates as high as 20%–30% were described for CSDH recurrences. However, following the introduction of subdural drainage, reoperation rates dropped to approximately 10%. The standard surgical technique includes burr-hole craniostomy, followed by intraoperative irrigation and placement of subdural drainage. Yet, the role of intraoperative irrigation has not been established. If there is no difference in recurrence rates between intraoperative irrigation and no irrigation, CSDH surgery could be carried out faster and more safely by omitting the step of irrigation. The aim of this multicentre randomised controlled trial is to study whether no intraoperative irrigation and subdural drainage results in non-inferior outcome compared with intraoperative irrigation and subdural drainage following burr-hole craniostomy of CSDH.Methods and analysis This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel group, non-inferiority multicentre trial comparing single burr-hole evacuation of CSDH with intraoperative irrigation and evacuation of CSDH without irrigation. In both groups, a passive subdural drain is used for 48 hours as a standard of treatment. The primary outcome is symptomatic CSDH recurrence requiring reoperation within 6 months. The predefined non-inferiority margin for the primary outcome is 7.5%. To achieve a 2.5% level of significance and 80% power, we will randomise 270 patients per group. Secondary outcomes include modified Rankin Scale, rate of mortality, duration of operation, length of hospital stay, adverse events and change in volume of CSDH.Ethics and dissemination The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS/3035/2019 §238) and duly registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. We will disseminate the findings of this study through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.Trial registration number NCT04203550
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/6/e038275.full
work_keys_str_mv AT jonasranstam finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT villeleinonen finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rahulraj finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT simotaimela finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kimmolonnrot finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT janekfrantzen finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT teppojarvinen finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jarnosatopaa finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pihlatommiska finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT christophschwartz finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rikukivisaari finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tluostarinen finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jussiposti finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT teemumluoto finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT samitetri finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT timokoivisto finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1724221925801066496
spelling doaj-626f8bd46bf34dd89453ec289c6ac2f12021-03-13T09:31:02ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-06-0110610.1136/bmjopen-2020-038275Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trialJonas Ranstam0Ville Leinonen1Rahul Raj2Simo Taimela3Kimmo Lönnrot4Janek Frantzen5Teppo Jarvinen6Jarno Satopää7Pihla Tommiska8Christoph Schwartz9Riku Kivisaari10T Luostarinen11Jussi Posti12Teemu M Luoto13Sami Tetri14Timo Koivisto151 Orthopedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden Department of Neurosurgery, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Pohjois-Savo, FinlandDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, FinlandFinland and Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopedics (FICEBO), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, FinlandDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, Department of Neurosurgery and Turku Brain Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, FinlandFinland and Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopedics (FICEBO), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, FinlandDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, FinlandDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, FinlandDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, FinlandDivision of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, FinlandDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, Department of Neurosurgery and Turku Brain Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, FinlandDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tampere University Hospital and Tampere University, Tampere, FinlandUnit of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, University of Oulu and Medical Research Center, Oulu, FinlandDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Pohjois-Savo, FinlandIntroduction Chronic subdural haematomas (CSDHs) are one of the most common neurosurgical conditions. The goal of surgery is to alleviate symptoms and minimise the risk of symptomatic recurrences. In the past, reoperation rates as high as 20%–30% were described for CSDH recurrences. However, following the introduction of subdural drainage, reoperation rates dropped to approximately 10%. The standard surgical technique includes burr-hole craniostomy, followed by intraoperative irrigation and placement of subdural drainage. Yet, the role of intraoperative irrigation has not been established. If there is no difference in recurrence rates between intraoperative irrigation and no irrigation, CSDH surgery could be carried out faster and more safely by omitting the step of irrigation. The aim of this multicentre randomised controlled trial is to study whether no intraoperative irrigation and subdural drainage results in non-inferior outcome compared with intraoperative irrigation and subdural drainage following burr-hole craniostomy of CSDH.Methods and analysis This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel group, non-inferiority multicentre trial comparing single burr-hole evacuation of CSDH with intraoperative irrigation and evacuation of CSDH without irrigation. In both groups, a passive subdural drain is used for 48 hours as a standard of treatment. The primary outcome is symptomatic CSDH recurrence requiring reoperation within 6 months. The predefined non-inferiority margin for the primary outcome is 7.5%. To achieve a 2.5% level of significance and 80% power, we will randomise 270 patients per group. Secondary outcomes include modified Rankin Scale, rate of mortality, duration of operation, length of hospital stay, adverse events and change in volume of CSDH.Ethics and dissemination The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS/3035/2019 §238) and duly registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. We will disseminate the findings of this study through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.Trial registration number NCT04203550https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/6/e038275.full