Difference in visual processing assessed by eye vergence movements.

Orienting visual attention is closely linked to the oculomotor system. For example, a shift of attention is usually followed by a saccadic eye movement and can be revealed by micro saccades. Recently we reported a novel role of another type of eye movement, namely eye vergence, in orienting visual a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Solé Puig, Laura Puigcerver, J Antonio Aznar-Casanova, Hans Supèr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3777953?pdf=render
id doaj-625fb19298574857a4bb0ad3c7a4faa0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-625fb19298574857a4bb0ad3c7a4faa02020-11-25T01:19:17ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0189e7204110.1371/journal.pone.0072041Difference in visual processing assessed by eye vergence movements.Maria Solé PuigLaura PuigcerverJ Antonio Aznar-CasanovaHans SupèrOrienting visual attention is closely linked to the oculomotor system. For example, a shift of attention is usually followed by a saccadic eye movement and can be revealed by micro saccades. Recently we reported a novel role of another type of eye movement, namely eye vergence, in orienting visual attention. Shifts in visuospatial attention are characterized by the response modulation to a selected target. However, unlike (micro-) saccades, eye vergence movements do not carry spatial information (except for depth) and are thus not specific to a particular visual location. To further understand the role of eye vergence in visual attention, we tested subjects with different perceptual styles. Perceptual style refers to the characteristic way individuals perceive environmental stimuli, and is characterized by a spatial difference (local vs. global) in perceptual processing. We tested field independent (local; FI) and field dependent (global; FD) observers in a cue/no-cue task and a matching task. We found that FI observers responded faster and had stronger modulation in eye vergence in both tasks than FD subjects. The results may suggest that eye vergence modulation may relate to the trade-off between the size of spatial region covered by attention and the processing efficiency of sensory information. Alternatively, vergence modulation may have a role in the switch in cortical state to prepare the visual system for new incoming sensory information. In conclusion, vergence eye movements may be added to the growing list of functions of fixational eye movements in visual perception. However, further studies are needed to elucidate its role.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3777953?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria Solé Puig
Laura Puigcerver
J Antonio Aznar-Casanova
Hans Supèr
spellingShingle Maria Solé Puig
Laura Puigcerver
J Antonio Aznar-Casanova
Hans Supèr
Difference in visual processing assessed by eye vergence movements.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Maria Solé Puig
Laura Puigcerver
J Antonio Aznar-Casanova
Hans Supèr
author_sort Maria Solé Puig
title Difference in visual processing assessed by eye vergence movements.
title_short Difference in visual processing assessed by eye vergence movements.
title_full Difference in visual processing assessed by eye vergence movements.
title_fullStr Difference in visual processing assessed by eye vergence movements.
title_full_unstemmed Difference in visual processing assessed by eye vergence movements.
title_sort difference in visual processing assessed by eye vergence movements.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Orienting visual attention is closely linked to the oculomotor system. For example, a shift of attention is usually followed by a saccadic eye movement and can be revealed by micro saccades. Recently we reported a novel role of another type of eye movement, namely eye vergence, in orienting visual attention. Shifts in visuospatial attention are characterized by the response modulation to a selected target. However, unlike (micro-) saccades, eye vergence movements do not carry spatial information (except for depth) and are thus not specific to a particular visual location. To further understand the role of eye vergence in visual attention, we tested subjects with different perceptual styles. Perceptual style refers to the characteristic way individuals perceive environmental stimuli, and is characterized by a spatial difference (local vs. global) in perceptual processing. We tested field independent (local; FI) and field dependent (global; FD) observers in a cue/no-cue task and a matching task. We found that FI observers responded faster and had stronger modulation in eye vergence in both tasks than FD subjects. The results may suggest that eye vergence modulation may relate to the trade-off between the size of spatial region covered by attention and the processing efficiency of sensory information. Alternatively, vergence modulation may have a role in the switch in cortical state to prepare the visual system for new incoming sensory information. In conclusion, vergence eye movements may be added to the growing list of functions of fixational eye movements in visual perception. However, further studies are needed to elucidate its role.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3777953?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT mariasolepuig differenceinvisualprocessingassessedbyeyevergencemovements
AT laurapuigcerver differenceinvisualprocessingassessedbyeyevergencemovements
AT jantonioaznarcasanova differenceinvisualprocessingassessedbyeyevergencemovements
AT hanssuper differenceinvisualprocessingassessedbyeyevergencemovements
_version_ 1725139051811438592