Assessing the Impact of Wildfires on the Use of Black Carbon as an Indicator of Traffic Exposures in Environmental Epidemiology Studies

Abstract Epidemiological studies frequently use black carbon (BC) as a proxy for traffic‐related air pollution (TRAP). However, wildfire smoke (WFS) represents an important source of BC not often considered when using BC as a proxy for TRAP. Here, we examined the potential for WFS to bias TRAP expos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. E. Martenies, L. Hoskovec, A. Wilson, W. B. Allshouse, J. L. Adgate, D. Dabelea, S. Jathar, S. Magzamen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2021-06-01
Series:GeoHealth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GH000347
id doaj-625f9c4e53c44728bd1f27a1062b5a24
record_format Article
spelling doaj-625f9c4e53c44728bd1f27a1062b5a242021-07-01T11:46:10ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)GeoHealth2471-14032021-06-0156n/an/a10.1029/2020GH000347Assessing the Impact of Wildfires on the Use of Black Carbon as an Indicator of Traffic Exposures in Environmental Epidemiology StudiesS. E. Martenies0L. Hoskovec1A. Wilson2W. B. Allshouse3J. L. Adgate4D. Dabelea5S. Jathar6S. Magzamen7Kinesiology and Community Healikth University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USADepartment of Statistics, Colorado State University Fort Collins CO USADepartment of Statistics, Colorado State University Fort Collins CO USAEnvironmental and Occupational Health, Colorado School of Public Health University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora CO USAEnvironmental and Occupational Health, Colorado School of Public Health University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora CO USADepartment of Epidemiology Colorado School of Public Health University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora CO USADepartment of Mechanical Engineering Colorado State University Fort Collins CO USAEnvironmental and Radiological Health Sciences Colorado State University Fort Collins CO USAAbstract Epidemiological studies frequently use black carbon (BC) as a proxy for traffic‐related air pollution (TRAP). However, wildfire smoke (WFS) represents an important source of BC not often considered when using BC as a proxy for TRAP. Here, we examined the potential for WFS to bias TRAP exposure assessments based on BC measurements. Weekly integrated BC samples were collected across the Denver, CO region from May to November 2018. We collected 609 filters during our sampling campaigns, 35% of which were WFS‐impacted. For each filter we calculated an average BC concentration. We assessed three GIS‐based indicators of TRAP for each sampling location: annual average daily traffic within a 300 m buffer, the minimum distance to a highway, and the sum of the lengths of roadways within 300 m. Median BC concentrations were 9% higher for WFS‐impacted filters (median = 1.14 μg/m3, IQR = 0.23 μg/m3) than nonimpacted filters (median = 1.04 μg/m3, IQR = 0.48 μg/m3). During WFS events, BC concentrations were elevated and expected spatial gradients in BC were reduced. We conducted a simulation study to estimate TRAP exposure misclassification as the result of regional WFS. Our results suggest that linear health effect estimates were biased away from the null when WFS was present. Thus, exposure assessments relying on BC as a proxy for TRAP may be biased by wildfire events. Alternative metrics that account for the influence of “brown” carbon associated with biomass burning may better isolate the effects of traffic emissions from those of other black carbon sources.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GH000347black carbonhealth effectswildfires
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. E. Martenies
L. Hoskovec
A. Wilson
W. B. Allshouse
J. L. Adgate
D. Dabelea
S. Jathar
S. Magzamen
spellingShingle S. E. Martenies
L. Hoskovec
A. Wilson
W. B. Allshouse
J. L. Adgate
D. Dabelea
S. Jathar
S. Magzamen
Assessing the Impact of Wildfires on the Use of Black Carbon as an Indicator of Traffic Exposures in Environmental Epidemiology Studies
GeoHealth
black carbon
health effects
wildfires
author_facet S. E. Martenies
L. Hoskovec
A. Wilson
W. B. Allshouse
J. L. Adgate
D. Dabelea
S. Jathar
S. Magzamen
author_sort S. E. Martenies
title Assessing the Impact of Wildfires on the Use of Black Carbon as an Indicator of Traffic Exposures in Environmental Epidemiology Studies
title_short Assessing the Impact of Wildfires on the Use of Black Carbon as an Indicator of Traffic Exposures in Environmental Epidemiology Studies
title_full Assessing the Impact of Wildfires on the Use of Black Carbon as an Indicator of Traffic Exposures in Environmental Epidemiology Studies
title_fullStr Assessing the Impact of Wildfires on the Use of Black Carbon as an Indicator of Traffic Exposures in Environmental Epidemiology Studies
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Impact of Wildfires on the Use of Black Carbon as an Indicator of Traffic Exposures in Environmental Epidemiology Studies
title_sort assessing the impact of wildfires on the use of black carbon as an indicator of traffic exposures in environmental epidemiology studies
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
series GeoHealth
issn 2471-1403
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Epidemiological studies frequently use black carbon (BC) as a proxy for traffic‐related air pollution (TRAP). However, wildfire smoke (WFS) represents an important source of BC not often considered when using BC as a proxy for TRAP. Here, we examined the potential for WFS to bias TRAP exposure assessments based on BC measurements. Weekly integrated BC samples were collected across the Denver, CO region from May to November 2018. We collected 609 filters during our sampling campaigns, 35% of which were WFS‐impacted. For each filter we calculated an average BC concentration. We assessed three GIS‐based indicators of TRAP for each sampling location: annual average daily traffic within a 300 m buffer, the minimum distance to a highway, and the sum of the lengths of roadways within 300 m. Median BC concentrations were 9% higher for WFS‐impacted filters (median = 1.14 μg/m3, IQR = 0.23 μg/m3) than nonimpacted filters (median = 1.04 μg/m3, IQR = 0.48 μg/m3). During WFS events, BC concentrations were elevated and expected spatial gradients in BC were reduced. We conducted a simulation study to estimate TRAP exposure misclassification as the result of regional WFS. Our results suggest that linear health effect estimates were biased away from the null when WFS was present. Thus, exposure assessments relying on BC as a proxy for TRAP may be biased by wildfire events. Alternative metrics that account for the influence of “brown” carbon associated with biomass burning may better isolate the effects of traffic emissions from those of other black carbon sources.
topic black carbon
health effects
wildfires
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GH000347
work_keys_str_mv AT semartenies assessingtheimpactofwildfiresontheuseofblackcarbonasanindicatoroftrafficexposuresinenvironmentalepidemiologystudies
AT lhoskovec assessingtheimpactofwildfiresontheuseofblackcarbonasanindicatoroftrafficexposuresinenvironmentalepidemiologystudies
AT awilson assessingtheimpactofwildfiresontheuseofblackcarbonasanindicatoroftrafficexposuresinenvironmentalepidemiologystudies
AT wballshouse assessingtheimpactofwildfiresontheuseofblackcarbonasanindicatoroftrafficexposuresinenvironmentalepidemiologystudies
AT jladgate assessingtheimpactofwildfiresontheuseofblackcarbonasanindicatoroftrafficexposuresinenvironmentalepidemiologystudies
AT ddabelea assessingtheimpactofwildfiresontheuseofblackcarbonasanindicatoroftrafficexposuresinenvironmentalepidemiologystudies
AT sjathar assessingtheimpactofwildfiresontheuseofblackcarbonasanindicatoroftrafficexposuresinenvironmentalepidemiologystudies
AT smagzamen assessingtheimpactofwildfiresontheuseofblackcarbonasanindicatoroftrafficexposuresinenvironmentalepidemiologystudies
_version_ 1721347042867937280