What Comes First, What Comes Next: Information Packaging in Written and Spoken Language
The paper explores similarities and differences in the strategies of structuring information at sentence level in spoken and written language, respectively. In particular, it is concerned with the position of the rheme in the sentence in the two different modalities of language, and with the applica...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | ces |
Published: |
Karolinum Press
2017-07-01
|
Series: | Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Philologica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/24646830.2017.4 |
id |
doaj-625998e8928c48dab996a3ab46c3ef56 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-625998e8928c48dab996a3ab46c3ef562020-11-25T04:02:01ZcesKarolinum PressActa Universitatis Carolinae: Philologica0567-82692464-68302017-07-0120171516110.14712/24646830.2017.44944What Comes First, What Comes Next: Information Packaging in Written and Spoken LanguageVladislav SmolkaThe paper explores similarities and differences in the strategies of structuring information at sentence level in spoken and written language, respectively. In particular, it is concerned with the position of the rheme in the sentence in the two different modalities of language, and with the application and correlation of the end-focus and the end-weight principles. The assumption is that while there is a general tendency in both written and spoken language to place the focus in or close to the final position, owing to the limitations imposed by short-term memory capacity (and possibly by other factors), for the sake of easy processibility, it may occasionally be more felicitous in spoken language to place the rhematic element in the initial position or at least close to the beginning of the sentence. The paper aims to identify differences in the function of selected grammatical structures in written and spoken language, respectively, and to point out circumstances under which initial focus is a convenient alternative to the usual end-focus principle.http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/24646830.2017.4word orderfunctional sentence perspectiveend-focuswritten languagespoken language |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
ces |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Vladislav Smolka |
spellingShingle |
Vladislav Smolka What Comes First, What Comes Next: Information Packaging in Written and Spoken Language Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Philologica word order functional sentence perspective end-focus written language spoken language |
author_facet |
Vladislav Smolka |
author_sort |
Vladislav Smolka |
title |
What Comes First, What Comes Next: Information Packaging in Written and Spoken Language |
title_short |
What Comes First, What Comes Next: Information Packaging in Written and Spoken Language |
title_full |
What Comes First, What Comes Next: Information Packaging in Written and Spoken Language |
title_fullStr |
What Comes First, What Comes Next: Information Packaging in Written and Spoken Language |
title_full_unstemmed |
What Comes First, What Comes Next: Information Packaging in Written and Spoken Language |
title_sort |
what comes first, what comes next: information packaging in written and spoken language |
publisher |
Karolinum Press |
series |
Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Philologica |
issn |
0567-8269 2464-6830 |
publishDate |
2017-07-01 |
description |
The paper explores similarities and differences in the strategies of structuring information at sentence level in spoken and written language, respectively. In particular, it is concerned with the position of the rheme in the sentence in the two different modalities of language, and with the application and correlation of the end-focus and the end-weight principles.
The assumption is that while there is a general tendency in both written and spoken language to place the focus in or close to the final position, owing to the limitations imposed by short-term memory capacity (and possibly by other factors), for the sake of easy processibility, it may occasionally be more felicitous in spoken language to place the rhematic element in the initial position or at least close to the beginning of the sentence.
The paper aims to identify differences in the function of selected grammatical structures in written and spoken language, respectively, and to point out circumstances under which initial focus is a convenient alternative to the usual end-focus principle. |
topic |
word order functional sentence perspective end-focus written language spoken language |
url |
http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/24646830.2017.4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vladislavsmolka whatcomesfirstwhatcomesnextinformationpackaginginwrittenandspokenlanguage |
_version_ |
1724444607214780416 |