What Comes First, What Comes Next: Information Packaging in Written and Spoken Language

The paper explores similarities and differences in the strategies of structuring information at sentence level in spoken and written language, respectively. In particular, it is concerned with the position of the rheme in the sentence in the two different modalities of language, and with the applica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vladislav Smolka
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: Karolinum Press 2017-07-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Philologica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/24646830.2017.4
id doaj-625998e8928c48dab996a3ab46c3ef56
record_format Article
spelling doaj-625998e8928c48dab996a3ab46c3ef562020-11-25T04:02:01ZcesKarolinum PressActa Universitatis Carolinae: Philologica0567-82692464-68302017-07-0120171516110.14712/24646830.2017.44944What Comes First, What Comes Next: Information Packaging in Written and Spoken LanguageVladislav SmolkaThe paper explores similarities and differences in the strategies of structuring information at sentence level in spoken and written language, respectively. In particular, it is concerned with the position of the rheme in the sentence in the two different modalities of language, and with the application and correlation of the end-focus and the end-weight principles. The assumption is that while there is a general tendency in both written and spoken language to place the focus in or close to the final position, owing to the limitations imposed by short-term memory capacity (and possibly by other factors), for the sake of easy processibility, it may occasionally be more felicitous in spoken language to place the rhematic element in the initial position or at least close to the beginning of the sentence. The paper aims to identify differences in the function of selected grammatical structures in written and spoken language, respectively, and to point out circumstances under which initial focus is a convenient alternative to the usual end-focus principle.http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/24646830.2017.4word orderfunctional sentence perspectiveend-focuswritten languagespoken language
collection DOAJ
language ces
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vladislav Smolka
spellingShingle Vladislav Smolka
What Comes First, What Comes Next: Information Packaging in Written and Spoken Language
Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Philologica
word order
functional sentence perspective
end-focus
written language
spoken language
author_facet Vladislav Smolka
author_sort Vladislav Smolka
title What Comes First, What Comes Next: Information Packaging in Written and Spoken Language
title_short What Comes First, What Comes Next: Information Packaging in Written and Spoken Language
title_full What Comes First, What Comes Next: Information Packaging in Written and Spoken Language
title_fullStr What Comes First, What Comes Next: Information Packaging in Written and Spoken Language
title_full_unstemmed What Comes First, What Comes Next: Information Packaging in Written and Spoken Language
title_sort what comes first, what comes next: information packaging in written and spoken language
publisher Karolinum Press
series Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Philologica
issn 0567-8269
2464-6830
publishDate 2017-07-01
description The paper explores similarities and differences in the strategies of structuring information at sentence level in spoken and written language, respectively. In particular, it is concerned with the position of the rheme in the sentence in the two different modalities of language, and with the application and correlation of the end-focus and the end-weight principles. The assumption is that while there is a general tendency in both written and spoken language to place the focus in or close to the final position, owing to the limitations imposed by short-term memory capacity (and possibly by other factors), for the sake of easy processibility, it may occasionally be more felicitous in spoken language to place the rhematic element in the initial position or at least close to the beginning of the sentence. The paper aims to identify differences in the function of selected grammatical structures in written and spoken language, respectively, and to point out circumstances under which initial focus is a convenient alternative to the usual end-focus principle.
topic word order
functional sentence perspective
end-focus
written language
spoken language
url http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/24646830.2017.4
work_keys_str_mv AT vladislavsmolka whatcomesfirstwhatcomesnextinformationpackaginginwrittenandspokenlanguage
_version_ 1724444607214780416