Book Review - Bentham’s Theory Of Fictions

This review1 is a commentary on Ogden’s introduction to Jeremy Bentham’s Theory of Fictions. 2 It tries to show that legal fiction suggests fraud by the user, and more, may well mislead the court. Ogden’s introduction separates into five major headings. There is a still a tendency among practising l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gary Lilienthal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UUM Press 2015-11-01
Series:UUM Journal of Legal Studies
Online Access:https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=5eaf32c0-590b-4155-b6bd-25ec05b5adea
id doaj-6255c2656ad149adafad3dbaa176d872
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6255c2656ad149adafad3dbaa176d8722021-06-15T12:50:45ZengUUM PressUUM Journal of Legal Studies2229-984X0127-94832015-11-0110.32890/uumjls.6.2015.4594Book Review - Bentham’s Theory Of FictionsGary LilienthalThis review1 is a commentary on Ogden’s introduction to Jeremy Bentham’s Theory of Fictions. 2 It tries to show that legal fiction suggests fraud by the user, and more, may well mislead the court. Ogden’s introduction separates into five major headings. There is a still a tendency among practising lawyers to speak in pejorative tones about the study of jurisprudence. This tendency may be an indicium of a failure to understand the law’s underlying reasoning, and instead, to prefer the law’s cultus,3 manifesting as fraud and abuse of legislative power. In this view, the reasons are the rules themselves. Therefore, this review addresses Ogden’s sections on legal fictions,the vocabulary of fiction,the technique of definition, and fallacies. The review will not discuss Ogden’s conclusion or his note on Bentham’s method of composition.https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=5eaf32c0-590b-4155-b6bd-25ec05b5adea
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gary Lilienthal
spellingShingle Gary Lilienthal
Book Review - Bentham’s Theory Of Fictions
UUM Journal of Legal Studies
author_facet Gary Lilienthal
author_sort Gary Lilienthal
title Book Review - Bentham’s Theory Of Fictions
title_short Book Review - Bentham’s Theory Of Fictions
title_full Book Review - Bentham’s Theory Of Fictions
title_fullStr Book Review - Bentham’s Theory Of Fictions
title_full_unstemmed Book Review - Bentham’s Theory Of Fictions
title_sort book review - bentham’s theory of fictions
publisher UUM Press
series UUM Journal of Legal Studies
issn 2229-984X
0127-9483
publishDate 2015-11-01
description This review1 is a commentary on Ogden’s introduction to Jeremy Bentham’s Theory of Fictions. 2 It tries to show that legal fiction suggests fraud by the user, and more, may well mislead the court. Ogden’s introduction separates into five major headings. There is a still a tendency among practising lawyers to speak in pejorative tones about the study of jurisprudence. This tendency may be an indicium of a failure to understand the law’s underlying reasoning, and instead, to prefer the law’s cultus,3 manifesting as fraud and abuse of legislative power. In this view, the reasons are the rules themselves. Therefore, this review addresses Ogden’s sections on legal fictions,the vocabulary of fiction,the technique of definition, and fallacies. The review will not discuss Ogden’s conclusion or his note on Bentham’s method of composition.
url https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=5eaf32c0-590b-4155-b6bd-25ec05b5adea
work_keys_str_mv AT garylilienthal bookreviewbenthamstheoryoffictions
_version_ 1721376366597767168